Posted on 08/27/2015 2:11:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
And there was this a few years back:
No pics, please.
*Hysterically scrubbing brain with bleach*
Yea, it was posted here a year ago, and it is no more substantive today than it was then.
But please, let the faux outrage begin!
RE: it is no more substantive today than it was then.
What does this mean, the report was false and he never and no longer does it?
Is your response tongue in cheek? Or are you really not clear on what not substantive or faux outrage mean?
not substantive - having no substance (in other words, a ridiculous and meaningless issue). These are secret service agents we’re talking about. Licensed to kill, as it were. An ass visible in the water is not going to bother them.
faux outrage - fake outrage, outwardly showing outrage that is not felt internally, that is not real (faux = false), for the purposes of bitching and moaning about something.
Does this help?
Your reply to SeekAndFind says much about your character.
.
It means that dmz rejects FR’s moral standards as much now as he did then.
IOW, not really anything new to be gathered from his posts.
Your reply to SeekAndFind says much about your character.
<><><>
I know. Thanks.
Most people would have ignored the question.
It means that dmz rejects FR’s moral standards as much now as he did then.
IOW, not really anything new to be gathered from his posts.
<><><><>
you beautifully demonstrate the faux outrage I spoke of earlier, ES.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.