Posted on 08/27/2015 1:17:18 PM PDT by fishtank
The Genesis Flood and Noah’s Ark. Fact or fiction?
by Tas Walker
Published: 27 August 2015 (GMT+10)
Many doubt the biblical story of Noah’s Flood. To many the story seems a gross exaggeration or a work of fiction. And if Noah’s Flood is not believable, why trust any historical account in the Bible? People have posed many objections to a factual interpretation of this event and this article (and the articles linked to it) answers many of the key questions people have about the Flood and the Ark.
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=dr+humphreys&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C29&as_sdtp=
There are PLENTY of references to “DR Humphreys” Sandia work esp. on the Z accelerator machine.
You didn’t answer my question about how many journal articles you have.
You couldn’t even perform a basic literature search.
I think you’re going to call that a “personal attack”.
You’re not even at the level of a novice graduate student, it seems.
I'm not disputing that he worked there, as I have said before.
I am saying there are two (that I found) very credible refutations to his model. The one that I referenced has to do with the "Pioneer Anomaly" which you can google for yourself.
The story of a global flood is an exaggerated tale based on localized events. Even more far fetched are claims that every species of animal was saved on a big boat. Or that a rainbow is God’s promise to never flood the earth again. Or... The list goes on and on.
Go on with your imaginary millions of years; it is at least amusing.
At the end of 10,000 years there would be no arable soil left on the continents.
.
So you're saying that the continents split and shifted to their current positions in less than 239 years?
To repeat the dishonesty of others is dishonest too.
You repeat assertions proven to be false to support your previous lies.
You are a real piece of work.
No, the word of God says that.
If you choose not to believe it, that’s between you and him.
.
.
>> “Ah yes, here come the personal attacks” <<
.
To report a fact is not an attack, but nice squirm though.
.
I'll take my chances.
Pioneer Anomaly. Not False.
.
>> “Pioneer Anomaly. Not False.” <<
.
Not relevant.
The assertion that it had any bearing on the model was false, as are most assertions of the guardians of stupidity.
.
.
I wouldn’t bet a sheet of well used toilet paper on your ‘chances.’
The use of bad data and the reliance on bad evidence is always relevant.
You use false information.
Humphries didn’t use any bad data.
When did this ice age start and how long did it last? I’m sure creation science must have done a lot of work in this area and it’d be interesting to see the the results.
It obviously started when the volcanic activity of the Genesis judgement began. It takes significantly warm water to produce that level of precipitation.
James Nienhuis would be the best source of info.
So the glaciers that carved the Norwegian fjords, for example, formed, excavated their valleys and then melted in about 1,000 years?
.
As usual all you have to offer in reply is a burning strawman
!
Since I didn’t offer anything close to what your strawman said, what was your next bit of anti-science, old earth naturalism going to be?
.
Ok, fair point. I jumped to a conclusion. My bad. Apologies.
Let me try again. When did the biblical, post-flood ice age occur?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.