Skip to comments.
CNN Editorial: The real 'anchor babies' are conservatives, not Asians
CNN Editorial ^
| 08/26/2015
| Jeff Yang
Posted on 08/26/2015 6:08:03 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: SeekAndFind
Yang, another “visitor” to my country.
21
posted on
08/26/2015 6:32:12 PM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: usconservative
The author probably would rather murder babies in the womb, chop them up “real good” and sale their body parts.
22
posted on
08/26/2015 6:38:26 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
“Once again the anti-free speech left wants to call the conservative position too offensive to voice. That way they dont have to bother their dictator selves with coming up an argument in a real debate. They can just whine offensive and then they are the only person left talking.”
Exactly, and definitely worth repeating.
To: SeekAndFind
If the image of an anchor is so offensive, how come CNN has news anchors?
To: ClearCase_guy
Unser Giftzwerg. “Our Poison Dwarf’’.
25
posted on
08/26/2015 6:48:45 PM PDT
by
jmacusa
To: King Moonracer
RE: Yang, another visitor to my country.
Yang was born in the USA Mar 14, 1968
To: SeekAndFind
In the movie “the good shepherd” there is the comment that if you are essentially not for this country, you are just visiting. Black, white, red or yellow, Yang is just visiting.
27
posted on
08/26/2015 6:58:59 PM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: SeekAndFind
Perhaps the author would prefer the term “hardpoint baby”, “tie down baby”, or “stanchion baby”. I’m amenable to alternatives.
28
posted on
08/26/2015 7:49:14 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
To: SeekAndFind
remind me again what china does to anyone found sneaking into their country?
and what would they do to any children of such people?
29
posted on
08/26/2015 8:01:57 PM PDT
by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: SeekAndFind
Is Idiot Inc. saying that Conservatives are here illegally? If not, the title of the article makes no sense.
I am not going to read the article. Idiot liberals, their is nothing wrong with the term “anchor baby”. The term refers illegal parent(s) exploit(ing) the baby for THEIR benefit. The exploited baby allows the illegal parent(s) to exploit government programs financed by the American Citizen and Legal Residents to the tune of millions and millions of dollars.
I am tired of being a sucker.
30
posted on
08/26/2015 8:04:28 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
To: SeekAndFind
To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
Max, I like your thoughts! To “Weigh Anchor” could be to measure the birth weight of the baby. This could go on forever......
32
posted on
08/26/2015 9:26:26 PM PDT
by
BatGuano
(You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
To: uncitizen
I prefer “Sticks and stones may break my bones but whips and chains excite me.” Just kidding...:-)
33
posted on
08/26/2015 9:28:36 PM PDT
by
BatGuano
(You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
To: BatGuano
😯
34
posted on
08/26/2015 9:55:16 PM PDT
by
uncitizen
(i hate gutless people, too.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Nathan Bedford's first Maxim of American politics:
all politics America in America is not local but ultimately racial.
Nathan Bedford's Maxim of Immigration Politics:
The immigration debate is about whether only people of color will be able to practice identity politics. See first Maxim of American politics.
35
posted on
08/27/2015 1:22:42 AM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: SeekAndFind
WSJ standards sure have dropped
36
posted on
08/27/2015 1:34:51 AM PDT
by
catfish1957
(I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
To: SeekAndFind
The author makes the following observation ( his own ) The majority white demographic in the USA is SLOWLY but SURELY decreasing due to low birthrate. The observation is correct, the attribution is not. The reason is that the majority white population is paying so much in taxes and affirmative action that it cannot AFFORD to buy bigger houses, pay larger college bills, and have more babies. So they behave responsibly and don't, while the Democratic demographic subsisting on entitlements runs them over.
37
posted on
08/27/2015 10:31:09 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson