Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado Republicans Cancel Presidential Poll at Caucuses (GOPe strikes back?)
ABC News ^ | 8/25/2015 | NICHOLAS RICCARDI

Posted on 08/26/2015 8:33:31 AM PDT by JediJones

The state party's executive committee voted Friday to eliminate the presidential preference poll held during the party's March caucuses. That means there will be no official count of who won that contest.

The vote was unanimous and drew little attention until it was reported by The Denver Post on Tuesday.

State GOP Chairman Steve House said the change was made in response to a new Republican National Committee rule that would have made the presidential preference poll binding.

The executive committee decided that would bring too much formality to the caucuses, which have drawn criticism in the past for being too easy for fringe candidates with small but motivated groups of supporters to overwhelm.

House acknowledged the party is essentially surrendering its early role in the presidential nominating contest.

"In this particular year, people are looking to (see) how can we be relevant if something unusual happens."

Colorado Democrats have made no changes to their March 1 caucuses, which still include a presidential preference poll.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: caucus; colorado; gop; house; primary; randpaul; republican; rnc; stevehouse; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Hat tip to Laura Ingraham's show this morning.

Basically, they don't want their delegates to HAVE to vote for whoever wins the presidential nomination in their caucuses. The national Republican party changed the rules this year so the delegates would have to be bound to the winner. Colorado in turn cancelled the presidential poll completely so their delegates can continue to vote for whoever they want no matter who the people of their state vote for.

1 posted on 08/26/2015 8:33:31 AM PDT by JediJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JediJones

To clarify, their people WILL NOT vote on a candidate in the GOP primary. They will only select delegates who can vote for whoever they want. Their primary will not have a “winner” among the candidates because they won’t even have a vote on the candidates.


2 posted on 08/26/2015 8:35:37 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
The executive committee decided that would bring too much formality to the caucuses, which have drawn criticism in the past for being too easy for fringe candidates with small but motivated groups of supporters to overwhelm.

Yeah...right. That's the reason.

3 posted on 08/26/2015 8:41:30 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

The dishonesty of the GOPe is undemocratic. What is the value of this party, which neither contests the opposition, nor differs with it.

It is cronyism and graft of an order not rivaled by any Latin American or African country.

The only difference is the public’s unwillingness to see it.


4 posted on 08/26/2015 8:43:03 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Trump needs to address all this tomfoolery and again float the idea of running 3rd party if the shenanigans continue. He’s getting the media in line, now he needs to blowtorch the GOPe apparatus in all the states who are considering toying with the process.


5 posted on 08/26/2015 8:47:16 AM PDT by ballearthout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
It looks like Republicans in Colorado will continue to have essentially no input into selecting the Republican nominee for president. And as I suspected, the new state executive board has no interest in fixing this.

The caucuses are so ridiculous that practically no one attends; and at the last one I attended, 3/4 of the people who did show up left immediately after the presidential straw poll. Eliminating this poll should therefore result in a turnout that is about 1/4 of the usually dismal number.

6 posted on 08/26/2015 8:48:05 AM PDT by snarkpup ("No matter how paranoid you are, you're not paranoid enough." - Susan Modesky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

ping


7 posted on 08/26/2015 8:50:38 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Caucuses should be banned. Here, we see attempt to hide the real choice of delegates, to facilitate fraud by GOPe.


8 posted on 08/26/2015 8:50:46 AM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

“The dishonesty of the GOPe is undemocratic”.

It really is. It mirrors the Democrats.


9 posted on 08/26/2015 8:52:54 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

The delegates will still vote at the GOP national convention. They just won’t be bound
by the usual caucus vote earlier in the year......

http://cologop.org/colorados-delegates-to-the-2016-rnc-will-be-unbound/

August 25, 2015

GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo.—Last Friday, members of the Colorado Republican Committee’s Executive
Committee decided against holding a straw poll at its 2016 caucus. The decision means Colorado’s
delegates to the 2016 Republican National Convention will be unbound.

Republican National Committee bylaws do
not allow states to hold non-binding preference polls. Any straw poll conducted at the caucus in
2016 would bind delegates to the poll’s results, even if a candidate ultimately decides to suspend
or withdraw their campaign.

“Eliminating the straw poll means the delegates we send to the national convention in Cleveland
will be free to choose the candidate they feel can best put America back on a path to prosperity
and security,” Chairman Steve House said. “No one wants to see their vote cast for an empty chair,
especially not on a stage as big as the national convention’s.”


10 posted on 08/26/2015 9:07:53 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

I’m in Colorado - and this really pisses me off. If the GOPe shoves Yeb! up my rear-end as a nominee, I’ll vote a straight Demo ticket. It appears that the GOP is trying to leave me - not me leaving the GOP.


11 posted on 08/26/2015 9:12:27 AM PDT by JoeVet (First rule of holes ... when you find yourself standing in one - stop digging ... unless ur a Dim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

These discussions have been going on long before the current slate of candidates developed.

The “non-binding” straw polls have been managed by unenforceable “rules” for some time, all the way down to the precinct level.

The delegates are elected and “sometimes” are told their vote MUST reflect the results of the straw poll.

In fact, the delegates can cast their ballot for whomever they please.


12 posted on 08/26/2015 9:17:26 AM PDT by G Larry (Obama is replicating the instruments of the fall of Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

The GOP-E of Colorado knows what’s best for Colorado, Coloradans, and all Americans, legal and illegal, they’ve been told by Reince Prince and the RNC. Jeb Bush would approve of this comment.


13 posted on 08/26/2015 9:17:59 AM PDT by duffee (No money to the Mississippi Republican Party as long as joe nosef is chairman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

The national GOP did a good thing.

In 2012, Paul stole Colorado, Minnesota, Louisiana and Iowa from Santorum. Had those states quickly awarded delegates to him, Santorum would have finished the early states right on Romney’s heals. He would have very likely been seen as the not-Romney candidate in Super Tuesday. Had he won Super Tuesday, he quite possibly would have been the candidate.

As it was, Santorum and Gingrich split Super Tuesday’s not-Romney popular vote very evenly, with Paul also getting a sizeable chunk. With that split , Romney swept Super Tuesday with a fairly small plurality and then rolled through April with huge super-majorities.


14 posted on 08/26/2015 9:21:10 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeVet

The GOP left many of us, long ago, but they still send request for money.


15 posted on 08/26/2015 9:21:47 AM PDT by duffee (No money to the Mississippi Republican Party as long as joe nosef is chairman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

The GOP continues to commit suicide as a national party. If it were not for Cruz, I’d be openly lobbying for Trump to leave and start the third party that will quickly replace the GOP. Nothing says that these two parties must be the ONLY parties in America. As recently as 1968, FIVE states gave their electoral votes to a third party.


16 posted on 08/26/2015 9:35:10 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duffee

I won’t donate to them. I sat in one of their call centers pushing people to go vote. Held my nose and pulled the lever for both McInsane and Mitts.

No more. I’ve had enough of them.

We gave them the House and the Senate and what have they given us? They got the Gold Mine, while we got the shaft.

I’m retired so I don’t have many years left on the planet. It’s not likely to impact me as much as the next generation that’s going to take over. If it screws the GOPe, then so be it.


17 posted on 08/26/2015 9:56:16 AM PDT by JoeVet (First rule of holes ... when you find yourself standing in one - stop digging ... unless ur a Dim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Just this morning I was telling my wife Trump isn’t my first, second, and possibly third choice.
However, if the eGOP prevent Trump from a fair shot at the nomination or try to keep him off the primary ballots they better nominate Cruz or maybe one other .
If they somehow get Bush, Kascish, Graham the nomination I’ll vote 3rd Party for Trump (if he does that) or write in his name.


18 posted on 08/26/2015 10:03:48 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeVet
I’m retired so I don’t have many years left on the planet.

I'm with you . This may be my last Presidential election, if I make it that far.
No more lesser of two evils.

19 posted on 08/26/2015 10:08:08 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dangus

“with that split , Romney swept Super Tuesday with a fairly small plurality and then rolled through April with huge super-majorities.”

And we see how well that worked out! Romney was so succesful that he garnered 5 million less R votes than McCain....


20 posted on 08/26/2015 10:09:31 AM PDT by CSM (White wine sipping, caviar munching, Georgetown cocktail circuit circulating, Perrier conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson