Posted on 08/23/2015 4:47:05 PM PDT by bestintxas
So he’s hoping to move up to a position where the rounding error actually registers at 1%?
That’s not leadership,thats cartel.
Pataki is not the answer. Would I vote for him over Hillary or Bernie Sanders? Yes. Do I think he’s got a snowballs chance? No.
And this is why Deez Nuts is polling better than Pataki
The only primary candidates who support ending anchor baby citizenship are Trump, Santorum, Cruz, Carson, Paul, Jindal and Christie.
Everyone else should be disqualified as being complicit in the destruction of America.
No other name should even be floated as a possible choice by any true conservative sites.
I'm embarrassed that even though I began to sour on Dubya in '05, it took John McCain and 2008 to really open my eyes to Republican perfidy. G.H.W.B. should have been all I needed to deduce how rotten the GOP foundation had become, but I f'd up: I trusted them.
Mr. niteowl77
I would wager that a large percentage of our sitting congressman were elected to office because of similar ballots
What chance would a true conservative have against any one of them? Particularly in NY or most other blue states.
“It’s downright stunning to see how deep in dumb they are.”
And that, with all due respect, is why we are in trouble. It really isn’t stunning. From the moment we became a society in which being a politician could be a career, it was inevitable we would have poor leadership.
It has nothing to do, IMHO, with their intelligence. I don’t think you have to be Einstein to be an effective President, or Congressman, or Senator etc. To be effective, you must put the country before self, and to not be driven by ego to the point that your can’t admit you are wrong and can’t take advice from those more qualified to render certain decisions
That, unfortunately, appears to be a rarity in current day politics. Honestly, I truly believe we’d do better having revolving groups of randomly picked high school seniors running the country. I’m serious.
So true. They are very out of touch with reality.
Cut them off from ALL their freebies and possibilities for schooling and employment and they’ll self deport in no time.
Pataki listen up. The wall? It’s already law, build it. Deporting those here illegally? It’s the law, do it. Keeping those here illegally from getting jobs? Again, it’s the law enforce it. A candidate who flat out refuses to do these things? Forget it.
“Particularly in NY or most other blue states.”
NY is in a deep and irreversible decline in worth, population, and electoral votes.
Not worth it.
“Cut them off from ALL their freebies and possibilities for schooling and employment and they’ll self deport in no time.”
Need to fine the companies who hire them too
Piss on Pitaki
These fools just don't get it.
“Think about it. This is a “Republican” who is Pro-Crime.”
Nothing new. The Republican governor of Texas flew out to California in 1994 when were fighting to pass Prop 187. That governor took the side of the invading illegal aliens and came out against the grassroots Californians working for Prop 187. GW Bush. It didn’t surprise me when that s.o.b. tried to ram amnesty through.
What’s a “pataki”? That some kind of Eastern European breakfast pastry?
And why would a pastry have an opinion on anything, let alone immigration?
It’s probably 40 million or more illegal criminals.
FU, George Pataki. You’ll be at the kid’s table once again at the next debate, pretending you’re a presidential candidate.
The founding fathers were brilliant, but they screwed up by not having term limits for presidents, senators, and representatives from the get go.
Lifetime appointments for judges was another mistake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.