Posted on 08/23/2015 10:33:40 AM PDT by SJackson
(Originally posted to the author’s website, Abu Yehuda}
As many of you know, I returned to live in Israel a year ago after 26 years in the place I consider my beloved hometown, Fresno California, located in the large valley that runs down the center of the state. It is more or less equidistant from Los Angeles and San Francisco; politically it is on a different planet. Its establishment is solidly socially and politically conservative, although Democrats have a slight edge in voter registration. The main industries are agriculture and related occupations, and there is a branch of the California State University known for its business and ag schools. Fresno was the home of noted writer William Saroyan and also a number of surprisingly good poets.
Fresno has a tiny Jewish community, no more than 1000 families in a metropolitan area of about a half million people. On several occasions I was told that I was the first Jew my interlocutor had met. I never noticed anyone checking for horns, though.
There is a Reform Temple with about 350 adult members, a much smaller Conservative congregation and a Chabad house. There are several churches on any non-residential block, including Catholic, several kinds of Orthodox, and countless Protestant denominations.
The three Congressmen representing the Fresno area are two Republicans (Jeff Denham and Devin Nunes) and one Democrat, Jim Costa. The Republicans are opposed to the nuclear deal with Iran, but Costa is still undecided. As part of its campaign against the deal, AIPAC is holding ‘townhall’ meetings with its members and undecided congresspersons. Tonight there will be such a meeting with Jim Costa in Fresno.
It will take place in an Evangelical church, the Cornerstone Church of Pastor Jim Franklin.
This seemed strange to me. Why would AIPAC hold a meeting in a church, one which happens to be located in downtown Fresno about as far from most of the Jewish population as possible? Oh, it’s a great facility, modern and attractive, and Franklin is one of the most solidly pro-Israel people you will find anywhere. But aren’t most of AIPAC’s members Jewish?
Temple Beth Israel, the Reform congregation, also a large modern facility, located on the other side of town, would seem to be the appropriate place. But the event is not being held there, and in fact the Temple decided not to move its scheduled board meeting from this evening, which will make it difficult for the board members to attend the AIPAC event. When I inquired, I was told that the rabbi felt the Iran issue would be “too divisive” for the Temple.
You can smell the fear. This is what American liberal Judaism has come to.
AIPAC is a non-partisan organization whose objective is to lobby American politicians in support of Israel. Until recently American Jews have also supported Israel regardless of whether they were Democrats (most were) or Republicans.
But as the Democratic Party moved leftward – a move that sharply accelerated with the election of Barack Obama – Jews began to find themselves conflicted. The anti-Israel narrative formerly associated only with the extreme Left became more and more part of the conventional wisdom in liberal circles. An emblematic event took place at the Democratic National Convention in 2012 when language referring to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel was removed and reinserted to a chorus of boos.
Now that Barack Obama has placed his prestige and authority on the line for the Iran deal which Israel (and AIPAC) strongly oppose, the conflict became even sharper. The Iran deal serves multiple purposes for the administration, such as advancing its goals of extracting the US from the Middle East and ending the era of American world leadership. It is also intended to weaken Israel, which it sees as a colonial power oppressing the real ‘owners’ of the Middle East. This project requires separating Israel from its traditional support in the US.
Obama and his people chose to play the Jew card. By presenting opponents of the deal as traitors and warmongers – and Jewish ones particularly as disloyal – the administration is trying to make pro-Israel expression uncomfortable, especially for Jews. When Obama talked about “tens millions of dollars in advertising” and “the same people who argued for the war in Iraq” they heard “Jewish money” and “Jewish neo-cons.” His thousands of surrogates on social media were far less subtle.
This strategy is having its desired effect. Liberal American Jews are being forced to choose between support for the Jewish homeland and what they perceive as loyalty to their country. The Reform movement as a whole preferred not to take a stand on the deal, and apparently the Fresno contingent sees it as too damaging to their fragile unity even to discuss. But this is exactly what they should discuss.
It’s interesting that a movement which values ‘involvement’ and ‘social action’ so strongly and which purports to favor open discussion and democracy above all, has fled from engagement with this particular issue, because it’s “too divisive.” This isn’t just hypocrisy. A big part of the problem is that American Jews have been manipulated by demagogic techniques that appealed to their deep-seated fear of the traditional antisemitic accusations of disloyalty.
AIPAC’s event will be held in an Evangelical church in Fresno because Evangelical Christians, in Fresno and in general, still have more courage to stand up for the survival of a Jewish state than Reform Jews.
My husband talked with our local Chabad rabbi, Rabbi Zimmerman and he said so many Jews in the Tucson area are angry that not one temple, reformed and orthodox is against the deal.
Rabbi Zimmerman is in Oro Valley and he wanted to attend Dennis Prager’s event here for CUFI, Christians United for Israel, but was not able to.
Prager in his talked rained shame on the rabbis who were not in attendance and not standing with Christians who want to protect Israel.
Very interesting. Its so difficult to understand where American Jews ate coming from. If its all about liberalism then they’ve been foiled into thinking their own self preservation must be exchanged for liberalism. But bravo to the liberal establishment for selling that one!
A Rabbi warning Zev Bronstein -- nom de guerre, Leon Trotsky -- that Jews will not profit from the Bolshevik revolution. The Rabbi was proven correct when a Stalin sent assassin crashed an ice axe in Leon Trotsky's head while he was exiled in Mexico.
And btw--AIPAC is made up of liberal Democrats. It is far, far, far from the "hawkish" organization the Pat Buchanans of the world make it out to be.
Liberal Jews Afraid to Oppose Second Holocaust
Where does Chuck Schumer fit into all this?
On the one hand, he was not afraid to declare his opposition to the Iran Treaty, because, according to him, he consulted with his conscience.
On the other hand, he has been afraid to lobby his fellow Democratic Senators against the treaty — an action which could result in the treaty actually being voted down by Congress since Chuck has enormous power among Congressional Democrats.
It’s as if Chuck’s teeny weeny little conscience managed to stand up long enough for him to oppose the treaty, but then due to overexertion it collapsed and many never be heard from again.
AIPAC has always been bi-partisan, which I think was a good thing. The far left may change that, though J Street hasn’t exactly eclipsed AIPAC as they’d hoped. Hawkish, no they’re not what Buchanan or his fellow traveler Obama describe. Ironically Jews were the demographic most opposed to the Iraq war, in the upper 70% range as I recall. Facts don’t stop Pat or Obama
Seems to me an unwillingness to lobby his fellow Senators would be a disqualifier for the position of majority leader. Or any leadership position, persuasion is what leaders do. Maybe only for political reasons, not reasons of conscience. I’m glad he spoke out, that he’s shrunk back from the role of providing others cover, I’d say that’s a failure of conscience, or more likely intimidation.
Might be of interest since it’s from Fresno
Thanks. I’ve been to Cornerstone church a couple times for conservative events. Was invited by a Jewish FReeper.
Many of their gutless ancestors were afraid to oppose the Nazis, too.
I’ve been involved with a few back & forths on this subject. When one brings up the Jews in America, it’s so damn easy for them to not be interested in this....
They aren’t routinely targeted for violence
They don’t have to worry about rockets and mortars landing on their homes, schools, synagogues
They don’t have to worry about Hamas, etc, coming out of a tunnel and kidnapping them
They don’t have to worry about someone walking into a market or getting on a bus with TNT strapped to their body
Basically, except for some vandalism once and while(some of which turns out to be fraudulent), they don’t have to worry about sh*t. They have two oceans, a phenomenal law enforcement apparatus and the most lethal military machine ever know to man, protecting their sorry, liberal, leftist asses. With the dregs of the world pouring over the border or getting off a Delta flight at Hartsfield, that might change. They may eventually see what it’s like to be hated, despised, and targeted and they might start changing their minds.
the American Jew is about as Israeli Jew as most African Americans are African, Not too much.
“You can smell the fear. This is what American liberal Judaism has come to.”
Fear. Intellectual calcification. Ostriches. Such an ennobling ideology, liberalism.
It’s not just fear. A good number of liberal American Jews support the Iran nuclear deal out of genuine conviction and dislike Netanyahu and the Likud. Just look at The Jewish Daily Forward. Take Barbara Boxer for instance. She backs the Iran deal and I don’t picture her fearing anyone. She’s a tough, nasty left-winger, and customarily pro-Israel.
They do, and though I disagree, that’s fine. If they buy into Obama’s opponents are traitors or manipulative Jew stuff they need to look into their hearts, because they’re haters.
There is no “Jewish Daily Forward”. The Yiddish commies have dropped Yiddish and any pretense of being Jewish.
Don’t be silly. You don’t next to speak Yiddish to be a Jew, and to this day the Forward is a popular publication among liberal Jews. The minority of right-leaning Jews have Commentary as an ideological organ.
https://twitter.com/#!/jdforward
You misunderstand. The dropped the “Jewish” and “Daily”, giving up the pretense of religion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.