Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz: Religious liberty is my foundational passion(Face the Nation- 2 min vid)
Face the Nation ^ | 8/23/2015 | Staff

Posted on 08/23/2015 9:10:21 AM PDT by VinL

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, says protecting the religious liberty of Americans has been his decades-long passion. The Texan senator believes "liberal intolerance" of the Bible is fundamentally wrong. Watch, 2 minute video.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cruz

1 posted on 08/23/2015 9:10:21 AM PDT by VinL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VinL
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It is first for a reason.
2 posted on 08/23/2015 9:27:13 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And this is the fundamental reason I support him.


3 posted on 08/23/2015 9:42:07 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Reading comprehension is important.

Congress has not made any laws regarding religion, nor has congress prohibited anyone's free exercise.

Ted Cruz, the brilliant constitutional lawyer should actually read the constitution before embarrassing himself again.

4 posted on 08/23/2015 9:50:34 AM PDT by lewislynn (Meghan Kelley...#sand--Rosie, the Don was right-- Hillary, lipstick on a pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

It cuts right to the heart of the sources of oppression both in practice and potential.

Its politically suicidal to say so but this is exactly why Barry Goldwater was 100% correct in opposing the version of the civil rights act that passed. The civil rights act should have explicitly excluded the private sector.

Not only are private businesses no longer able to refuse service against their religious objections, now they must serve people who demand that service than to insult their religious ideals.

It may not be exactly the same as Jewish concentration inmates forced to perform for nazis, but we are definitely heading in that direction.


5 posted on 08/23/2015 9:53:43 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Love to hear him speak.


6 posted on 08/23/2015 10:06:45 AM PDT by capt. norm (The best things in life are not thingsv<P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

I disagree, lewislynn. By prohibiting prayer in schools, by prohibiting religious expressions like nativity scenes & crosses in public places- & the plaques or statues containing the Ten Commandments (upon which *some*- not all, of our criminal law is based)…that is most definitely “prohibiting the free exercise thereof”.

Not one of those things interferes or infringes upon, in any way, with another person’s right to exercise their chosen faith.

Before this purge of Christianity from the schools & public places, there were no laws in place, but they were traditionally practiced by the majority of Americans just because they were. Then, Madeline Murray O’ Hare et al began suing to have these things to be prohibited- causing laws to be written.

I am a “traditional” Christian, not a dominionist or dispensationalist, but this is very definitely a violation of the First Amendment, imo. That this succeeded is a testament to the decay in our legislative & judicial branches.


7 posted on 08/23/2015 10:50:55 AM PDT by KGeorge (HELL no, we AIN'T forgettin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

But courts have misapplied this establishment clause and prohibited the free exercise of religion at federal, state, and local levels.


8 posted on 08/23/2015 11:04:45 AM PDT by DrewsDad (Environmental Extremism Eventually Endangers Everyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VinL

Cruz is the only one who understands the importance of this issue.


9 posted on 08/23/2015 2:56:14 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson