Skip to comments.
In Denial: Rubio Counters Trump, Backs Birthright Citizenship
newsmax ^
| 8/18/15
Posted on 08/18/2015 2:43:34 PM PDT by bestintxas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
A second tier candidate in freefall attempting to make himself relevant by going AGAINST the wishes of the majority of Americans.
Not very smart, Marco.
To: bestintxas
2
posted on
08/18/2015 2:45:42 PM PDT
by
Paine in the Neck
(Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
To: bestintxas
In Denial: Rubio Counters Trump, Backs Birthright Citizenship We don't care what Rubio thinks. He lost his chance to impress us with his opinions back when he supported Amnesty.
3
posted on
08/18/2015 2:46:32 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: bestintxas
4
posted on
08/18/2015 2:49:14 PM PDT
by
JPG
(What's the difference between the Rats and the GOPe? Nothing.)
To: bestintxas
"I'm not in favor of repealing the 14th Amendment."
Um, how about enforcing it as it is actually written along with keeping the invaders out? All of them no matter what country they come from to take advantage of liberal loopholes.
5
posted on
08/18/2015 2:49:20 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: DiogenesLamp
Trump is disposing of Kasich and Rubio in one package : )
6
posted on
08/18/2015 2:51:57 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: bestintxas
Rubio is stuck with his past and he can’t get himself free. Jeb is stuck, too.
To: bestintxas
Rubio says:... "There are people that come to the United States deliberately for the purposes of having a child that's a U.S. citizen"...."I'm NOT in favor of repealing the 14th Amendment."..........
Oh he's fishing for the Mexican/Latino vote right there.......he's got no place else to go!
Desperation!
8
posted on
08/18/2015 2:54:22 PM PDT
by
caww
To: DiogenesLamp
And we don’t care what the Constitution says ..It was written along time ago.
9
posted on
08/18/2015 2:56:16 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: bestintxas
10
posted on
08/18/2015 2:56:41 PM PDT
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: bestintxas
The 14th amendment DOES NOT make any such guarantee.
It specifically says those, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” An illegal alien is not an American and should be subject to their own country’s jurisdiction. That is why we should send them all back forthwith...unless they have injured or killed someone, or destroyer or stolen property. Then they should be severely punished and then immediately sent back.
That’s why babies born here should be given first aide...and then immediately deported with their mother.
It can, and should, be interpreted that way.
We just need politicians and then appointed judges who will properly interpret it according to the intent of the founders, and the interest of the United States..
11
posted on
08/18/2015 2:57:23 PM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: bestintxas
12
posted on
08/18/2015 2:58:19 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: stephenjohnbanker
Trumps playing King of the Mountain!
13
posted on
08/18/2015 2:59:57 PM PDT
by
caww
To: bestintxas
14
posted on
08/18/2015 3:01:36 PM PDT
by
Bobalu
(If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
To: Jeff Head
....”We just need politicians and then appointed judges who will properly interpret it “....
Well they aren’t and have no intentions of doing so or they would have argued and settled it by know. Every time they’ve tried they’ve failed.
15
posted on
08/18/2015 3:01:47 PM PDT
by
caww
To: Jeff Head
....”We just need politicians and then appointed judges who will properly interpret it “....
Well they aren’t and have no intentions of doing so or they would have argued and settled it by know. Every time they’ve tried they’ve failed.
16
posted on
08/18/2015 3:01:47 PM PDT
by
caww
To: Jeff Head
subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
This is a reference to diplomats who are not subject to US jurisdiction, hence “diplomatic immunity”
To: woofie
And we dont care what the Constitution says ..It was written along time ago. Maybe you don't, but I do. Of course it doesn't say anything about authorizing anchor babies.
18
posted on
08/18/2015 3:02:58 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: caww
You are right...but given what we are seeing...perhaps the times (at long last), they are a changing.
One can hope...and pray, because that is what it is going to take.
19
posted on
08/18/2015 3:03:05 PM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: bestintxas
I am all in favor of birthright citizenship for persons who are born in the United States
and "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." I do not favor birthright citizenship to people who are born in the United States because their mothers came here illegally before they were born.
It is amazing how many people go batshit crazy when you suggest limiting birthright citizenship by quoting the actual words of the 14th Amendment.
20
posted on
08/18/2015 3:03:25 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson