Trump: "Be Careful Carly"

Breitbart ^ | 14 August 2015 14 August 2014 | by Ian Hanchett

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned fellow candidate Carly Fiorina “Be careful Carly” in a speech in New Hampshire on Friday. After arguing that fellow candidates South Carolina Senator Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)and former Texas Governor Rick Perry fell in the polls after attacking him, Trump said, “Carly was a little nasty to me. Be careful Carly. Be careful. But I can’t say anything to her, because she’s a woman, and I don’t want to be accused of being tough on women. I can’t do that, right? Can I do that? Women, am I allowed to fight back? Am I allowed? She’s been a little nasty to me. So I promised that I wouldn’t say, and I said it to myself, I promised I wouldn’t say, that she ran Hewlett-Packard into the ground. I will not say it, that her stock value tanked, that she laid off tens of thousands of people, and she got viciously fired. I said I will not say that, and that she then went out, and ran against Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)for the United states Senate in California, and it’s a race that should’ve been won, and she lost in the landslide. And I said, ‘I will not say that’ Okay? All right? So I’m not going to say it.”

[Garvin]

Not a Trump fan, but he fights fire with fire.

[GBA]

However this all plays out overtime, this is a somewhat unique approach from the real world:

Women, am I allowed to fight back? Am I allowed? She’s been a little nasty to me.

So I promised that I wouldn’t say, and I said it to myself, I promised I wouldn’t say, that she ran Hewlett-Packard into the ground.

I will not say it, that her stock value tanked, that she laid off tens of thousands of people, and she got viciously fired.

I said I will not say that, and that she then went out, and ran against Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)for the United states Senate in California, and it’s a race that should’ve been won, and she lost in the landslide.

And I said, ‘I will not say that’ Okay? All right? So I’m not going to say it.”

Lol, well, he might not say it, but if I'm interviewing someone for the job, I know I would bring those things up!

If Trump won't say them I hope someone else will.

[Taliesan]

Right. Thanks for illustrating the point. The score keeping is just a bunch of schoolboys cheering for a cheeky snark. Nobody outside the little gym even cares what the cheering is about.

That you people even value “drippy sarcasm” as an important part of tallying an electoral college majority shows how clueless you are about how this contest ends. The Presidency is not won by “nyah nyah nyah.”

Make a note of this: Donald Trump is not going to be President. And if he isn’t, then the satisfaction of “upsetting the GOP power structure” won’t even be remembered. The Trump phenomenon is not going to move the other candidates to the right. It’s not teaching the establishment a lesson. It’s sole result will be to actually just immunize the beltway one more layer against the next cult of personality that “energizes the base.” Because it’s not the conservative base that Trump is energizing (he’s not a conservative). It’s the frustrated, who feel like losers, who just want somebody to be rude to the bad reporters who keep taking the election away and the snobby pundits who keep using big words against you.

The vanilla republicans that left the base at home (Romney, McCain, Dole) are just provoking an emotional reaction that won’t get you a candidate that will win more states in a general election.

Enjoy the catharsis. We’ll all be back here in a few months reminding ourselves that math doesn’t care how you feel.

Back to the only assertion whose truth or falsehood matters: Trump is not going to win an electoral college majority.

[yuleeyahoo]

Has she been caught stealing?

[V K Lee]

He’s fun to watch BECAUSE he’s full of rage. Rage has been tamped down so hard in this country We are criticized when it is being seen done. We are force fed pc to the point when that jihadist standing along side takes a knife to our neck that all we know to do is nod, smile and lift our chin. Once rage can no longer be displayed, truth is silenced and we have lost. It has been decades since the libs have seen rage from our side. They’ve forgotten how to deal with it. So all they know is doing exactly what they have been doing, and we’re getting a peek of exactly what that strategy is every day. Lie, belittle and lie some more. Umm....Einstein and insanity, keep doing what you’re doing.

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

Refreshing, is it not?

[caww]

Are others getting to know Trump talk when you read or hear it?.....if he says someone is nasty...that's his polite way of saying he doesn't like them at all...without saying it.

There's got to be a word for it when.... Trump says something that might be taken offensively (not politically correct) but then asks out loud, can he say that,..and goes on about it that maybe he shouldn't say it...but the cat is already out of the bag???????

Whatever it's called he uses it brilliantly!!

[caww]

That’s just Trump Talk.......hey... Carly threw her stuff out there at Trump.....so he was politely telling her fine, I don’t like you either.

Try not to put Trump into a box he doesn’t fit... to be what he’s not....he is not politically correct....and that is one of the reasons people like him...he’s being real... like him or not that’s the package.

I ‘want to’ see and hear these candidates go at it....I want to see their cool and wit because what we’re facing down the road they better darn well know how to stand their ground....and Carly shouldn’t be excluded because she’s a woman. She asked for this so let’s see how she handles it....which unfortunately when a woman stands her ground she either sounds whinny or screeching...and Carly is known for both.

[caww]

Did you think that perhaps nobody cares what political side of the aisle anyone is on anymore......that those Boxes are no longer holding names and numbers of the “expected”.

With our country ‘sinking’ and it’s crew chiefs abandoning their positions...why would people want anyone other then somebody who “sees” it’s sinking and has a crew willing to yank the ship back up above the water line.

Trump is not working this alone Taliesan ....he is one of many working the lines to get this ship above water...and that in a storm behind the scenes of the likes this nation has not seen....let Trump do just what he’s suppose to be doing....and wait....we’re about to take our country back. You’ll see it come together in time, but for now you’re seeing just a small part of the whole that’s operating now....let it roll!

[Democratic-Republican]

"Carly FioRINO"

Bravo! I wish I thought of that!

Reminder about Carly, which explains why she is getting talked up by every (R)epublicrat in sight, including Karl Rove who has been doing this with a straight face but without a whiteboard on the few Fox shows I can still stand to watch ...

TEA Party landslide year 2010

-=[ Nevada Senate ]=- 
Harry Reid       362,785 ( 50.3% )
Sharron Angle    321,361 ( 44.6% ) <-- TEA Party backer, attacked by Karl Rove and (R)epublicrats)

-=[ California Senate ]=-
Barbara Boxer  5,218,441 ( 52.2% )
Carly Fiorina  4,217,366 ( 42.2% ) <-- rejected TEA Party, praised by Karl Rove and (R)epublicrats

-=[ California Governor ]=-
Jerry Brown    5,428,458 ( 53.8% )
Meg Whitman    4,127,371 ( 40.9% ) <-- rejected TEA Party, praised by Karl Rove and (R)epublicrats

Angle came much closer to defeating the LEAST vulnerable (D)ummycrat and unseating the sitting Senate Majority leader than Carly did for a Senate seat against one of the MOST vulnerable (D)ummycrats. And that is really saying something considering the corrupt political machine that Reid has working in Nevada. Sharron lost by a mere 40k votes and 6%. Carly lost by 1 million and 10% after not letting Sarah help her out. Fellow (R)ovian (R)ino Meg Whitman had a similar outcome.

Yet we had ( and still have ) the major media and (R)epublicrat establishment incessantly pounding Sharron Angle mercilessly as the "TEA Party loser" without the corresponding description for Carly and Whitman as the "RINOcrat Losers". The chutzpah of the (R)ats in astounding. But facts are facts, and Rove can choke on it.

In fact, in the current coverage you wouldn't even know Carly ever ran in 2010 at all, but you can sure bet that if Angle were on the ballot they would never stop yapping about it. Carly is preferred by the GOPe precisely because she is their favorite kind of (R)epublican, a designated loser, a sacrifice on the altar of uniparty politics. So whenever Carly FioRINO is mentioned, think this ...

[berdie]

You misunderstand me. I don’t think candidates should be immune from criticism. There is nothing wrong with pointing out their histories. Even if they are women. That does not matter to me in the least (I’m a woman). I certainly agree with slapping back at the biased media.

But beginning a statement with “be careful” and “she wasn’t nice to me” sounds a little, for lack of a better word, juvenile. The “not nice” theme dominates his criticisms. Coming out with a rant every week will eventually loose it’s effectiveness. It keeps his name in the news, no doubt. So maybe this is all by design.

If Trump is elected, he will have to endure lots of criticism and “not nice”. What then?

I am neither for nor against Trump. Right now, today, I’m watching all of them.