Bakin' Baby Syndrome ... Mark Steyn

Steyn Online ^ | 5 Aug 2015 | Mark Steyn

[Rummyfan]

Senator Harry Reid and taxpayer-funded baby-parts mogul Cecile Richards.

The fifth in an apparent series of twelve Planned Parenthood undercover videos shows Melissa Farrell, director of research for Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, discussing how to manipulate the abortion procedure in order to ensure the "fetus" is delivered "intact" and thus able to be cannibalized for body parts. As Ms Farrell puts it, if a client "has a specific need for a certain portion of the products of conception and we bake that into our contract, and our protocol, that we follow this. So we deviate from our standard in order to do that."

In other words, their priority is not a "woman's health needs" but a cleanly delivered "fetus" with the relevant "portion of the products of conception" intact - the leg, the liver, the heart, the lung, whatever it is the client has had "baked" into the contract. This is in itself a crime: You're not supposed to manipulate the abortion - and potentially cause more pain and discomfort to the woman - in order to get clean, sellable baby parts.

But, as Ms Farrell makes plain, at Planned Parenthood they see the woman less as a patient than as a supplier whose truck needs a bit of maneuvering to align at the loading dock

[definitelynotaliberal]

God will not be mocked.

[TChad]

This is a uniquely American depravity - a billion-dollar abortion-industrial complex, unknown to the abortion regimes of France, Sweden, the Netherlands.

And it would never have been revealed to America by the leftist propagandists who call themselves journalists.

Flush the excrement media.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Not without mocking back

[HiTech RedNeck]

America does everything bigger. Even evil.

[skr]

It seems highly unlikely that European abortionists have nothing to do with selling babies’ body parts.

[aquila48]

“...baby-parts mogul Cecile Richards.”

One of Steyn’s best.

[TChad]

That would be my guess too, but Steyn and his staff are usually good about researching whatever Steyn states as fact. Perhaps in Europe, as in America, “journalists” provide cover for abortionists, so the true story has never been revealed.

[Arthur McGowan]

As Ms Farrell puts it, if a client "has a specific need for a certain portion of the products of conception and we bake that into our contract, and our protocol, that we follow this. So we deviate from our standard in order...

People exist who actually use these brainless, demonic euphemisms in conversation? Yech!

[HerrBlucher]

All genocide begins with dehumanizing the victims. So in the minds of these monsters it is not a baby but simply a product of conception. That relieves their conscience and then its full speed ahead with the dissection and sale.

[HiTech RedNeck]

It might also be that in economically stifled Europe, there isn’t as much of the “land of opportunity” vibe in it to drive such a thing. Enterprise can be turned to good or evil.

[HiTech RedNeck]

POC marked?

[nathanbedford]

Memorandum to Planned Parenthood Franchisees:

LEGALITY:

it is legal to kill babies providing you do so before the baby is actually born. You should kill the baby in the first trimester, depending on the jurisdiction in which you do the killing. Now on to VOCABULARY:

before the baby is born we call the thing a "fetus" but never a "baby." Now back to LEGALITY:

It is safe to chop up a "fetus" and sell its body parts providing A) you don't change procedure in any way to accommodate either the chopping or the harvesting of body parts, and B) providing you are recompensed for shipping costs but make no "profit." Now once again to VOCABULARY:

It does not matter whether you actually change procedure to accommodate the harvesting of baby body parts for sale providing you say you do not do so. It is absolutely essential always to deny; further, when negotiating for the price of baby parts, whoops excuse me, "fetus parts" you must always say that the money is for shipping costs even though the money is really fungible and for profit. Now back to LEGALITY:

There come occasions which are awkward, that is in which a fetus is born "intact" which, since the thing is born one might think should be called a "baby" but that would be a gross mistake as well as a tactical error. If the thing is born, whether alive or dead, it must be called a fetus even though it is a baby if it is in fact dead (because you've already killed it) or if you plan to just let it die alone on a table or in a closet, or even if you plan to kill it. WARNING:

if you concede that the thing is a baby instead of the fetus you might be guilty of murder if you are unlucky enough to operate in a red state. To SUMMARIZE:

it is okay to dismember a baby if you call it a fetus and it is okay to sell the parts for money if you don't call it a profit even though the practice is profitable. REMEMBER:

It does not matter what you do, it only matters what you say.

[gattaca]

Brilliant analysis. I always enjoy your posts.

[jazzlite]

...”~But then the self-absorbed hedonism of modern western life necessarily requires desensitization. Bloomberg reports an ISIS “sex slave” price list acquired in Iraq by UN official Zainab Bangura: A woman over 40 will set you back a mere 41 bucks, but if you prefer a girl aged nine or under - and who doesn’t? - the price rises to $165. As Laura Rosen Cohen points out, this is the real “war on women”. But nobody cares - because to care, seriously, either about an infanticide-industrial complex or nine-year-old sex-slaves in an American protectorate, would ask something of us. And to ask something - anything - more than a supportive hashtag is too much.”...

Mark Steyn is one of the few purely logical and truthful writer/commentators out there. He goes straight through the trashy hypocrisy to get to the pure evil of this murder of the innocent and the cannibalizing of their little body parts. How this Richard’s woman can get before the cameras with a straight face and declare that the opposition and the outrage towards the murder of millions of future women a “war on women,” is just unreal and is logic turned inside out and upside down. These Godless ghouls will face judgment for their heartlessness. I do not know whether it will be here on earth or in the next life, but this kind of hedonism will eventually bring horrific consequences to the people doing and supporting these awful things. You do not murder some to bring medical research for others. And, according to the legal experts, Planned Parenthood is commiting a felony when they manipulate the abortion technique to save the body parts for sale. It is hard, folks, to take all this in. Have you noticed that the heartless people discussing this ghoulish stuff on those video are all women? I look for wedding rings and I see none. Are they such radicalized femninists that they hate men as well as babies? Or am I wrong? Perhaps they were just not wearing their rings. Do they have children? Are they divorced. Who are they?

[jazzlite]

...”It does not matter what you do, it only matters what you say.”...

That is definitely true in this America we do not recognize.

[TTFlyer]

America. “Land of the Free - Home of the Brave.”

Really? How much longer?

Americans may revolt when their government checks won’t case, but as far as the American Holocaust goes, it’s a collective “meh.” As freedom and the fortitude to fight for it dies, so does our humanity.

It’s not that far between “I’m blessed to live in America” to “I’m cursed to live in America.”

It is a time for choosing, America. The hour is getting late.

[JudyinCanada]

Sadly, Canada has said that they also sell deceased baby parts and will continue to do so.

[Steven Tyler]

But, as Ms Farrell makes plain, at Planned Parenthood they see the woman less as a patient than as a supplier whose truck needs a bit of maneuvering to align at the loading dock

Steyn nails it, again

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

-— America does everything bigger. Even evil. -—

China and America sell the body parts of murdered innocents.

I never thought I’d live to say that.