Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China sets up first unmanned factory
The Business Standard ^ | July 27, 2015 | Press Trust of India

Posted on 07/30/2015 3:13:22 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A Chinese firm specialising in precision technology has set up the first unmanned factory at Dongguan city where all the processes are operated by robots, regarded as futuristic solution to tide over China's looming demographic crisis and dependence on manual workers.

In the plant, all the processes are operated by computer- controlled robots, computer numerical control machining equipment, unmanned transport trucks and automated warehouse equipment.

The technical staff just sits at the computer and monitors through a central control system.

At the workshop of Changying Precision Technology Company in Dongguan, known as the "world factory", which manufactures cell phone modules, 60 robot arms at 10 production lines polish the modules day and night, state-run People's Daily reported.

Each line has an automatic belt with just three workers who are just responsible for checking lines and monitoring. A few months ago, it required 650 workers to finish this process.

A robot arm can replace six to eight workers, now there are 60 workers and the number will be reduced to 20 in the future, Luo Weiqiang, general manager of the company told the Daily.

This is the first step of the "robot replace human" programme, it said.

In the next two years, the number of robots will be increased to 1,000 and 80 per cent process will be conducted by robots, said Chen Qixing, president of the company.

Compared with many skilled workers, these robots are new hands. But they made far more and better products than well- trained workers and experts, the report said.

With nearly 200 million people above 60 years and old age population set to rise sharply, China is bracing to face demographic crisis in the near future as it will have fewer work force.

Data at the Dongguan factory show that since the robots came to the plant the defect rate of products has dropped from over 25 per cent to less than 5 per cent and the production capacity from more than 8,000 pieces per person per month increased to 21,000 pieces.

The company is only a microcosm of Dongguan, one of the manufacturing hubs in China. The city plans to finish 1,000 to 1,500 "robot replace human" programmes by 2016.

With the implementation of "Made in China 2025" strategy, a growing number of "unmanned workshops or factories" will come out, the report said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: automation; china; manufacturing; robots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: 1rudeboy

Reagan Presidential Deeds

Words are not deeds. Unfortunately, a look at the record leads to the question: With free traders like this, who needs protectionists?

Consider that the administration has done the following:

— Forced Japan to accept restraints on auto exports. The agreement set total Japanese auto exports at 1.68 million vehicles in 1981-82, 8 percent below 1980 exports. Two years later the level was permitted to rise to 1.85 million.(33) Clifford Winston of the Brookings Institution found that the import limits have actually cost jobs in the U.S. auto industry by making it possible for the sheltered American automakers to raise prices and limit production. In 1984, Winston writes in Blind Intersection? Policy and the Automobile Industry, 32,000 jobs were lost, U.S. production fell by 300,000 units, and profits for U.S. firms increased $8.9 billion. The quotas have also made the Japanese firms potentially more formidable rivals because they have begun building assembly plants in the United States.(34) They also shifted production to larger cars, introducing to American firms competition they did not have before the quotas were created. In 1984, it was estimated that higher prices for domestic and imported cars cost consumers $2.2 billion a year.(35) At the height of the dollar’s exchange rate with the yen in 1984-85, the quotas were costing American consumers the equivalent of $11 billion a year.(36)

— Tightened up considerably the quotas on imported sugar. Imports fell from an annual average of 4.85 million tons in 1979-81 to an annual average of 2.86 million tons in 1982-86. Not only did this continued practice force Americans to spend more than other consumers for sugar, but it created hardships for Latin American countries and the Philippines, which depend on sugar exports for economic development. The quota program undermined President Reagan’s Caribbean Basin Initiative and intensified the international debt crisis.(37)

— Negotiated to increase restrictiveness of the Multifiber Arrangement and extended restrictions to previously unrestricted textiles. The administration unilaterally changed the rule of origin in order to restrict textile and apparel imports further and imposed a special ceiling on textiles from the People’s Republic of China.(38) Finally, it pressured Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea, the largest exporters of textiles and apparel to the United States, into highly restrictive bilateral agreements. All told, textile and apparel restrictions cost Americans more than $20 billion a year.(39) The Reagan administration has stated several times that textile and apparel imports should grow no faster than the domestic market.(40)

— Required 18 countries—including Brazil, Spain, South Korea, Japan, Mexico, South Africa, Finland, and Australia, as well as the European Community—to accept “voluntary restraint agreements” to reduce steel imports, guaranteeing domestic producers a share of the American market. When 3 countries not included in the 18—Canada, Sweden, and Taiwan— increased steel exports to the United States, the administration demanded talks to check the increase. The administration also imposed tariffs and quotas on specialty steel. These policies, with their resulting shortages, have severely squeezed American steel-using firms, making them less competitive in world markets and eliminating more than 52,000 jobs.(41)

— Imposed a five-year duty, beginning at 45 percent, on Japanese motorcycles for the benefit of Harley Davidson, which admitted that superior Japanese management was the cause of its problems.(42)

— Raised tariffs on Canadian lumber and cedar shingles.

— Forced the Japanese into an agreement to control the price of computer memory-chip exports and increase Japanese purchases of American-made chips. When the agreement was allegedly broken, the administration imposed a 100 percent tariff on $300 million worth of electronics goods. This episode teaches a classic lesson in how protectionism comes back to haunt a country’s producers. The quotas established as a result of the agreement have created a severe shortage of memory chips and higher prices for American computer makers, putting them at a disadvantage with foreign competitors. Only two American firms are still making these chips, accounting for a small percentage of the world market.(43)

— Removed Third World countries from the duty-free import program for developing nations on several occasions.

— Pressed Japan to force its automakers to buy more American-made parts.(44)

— Demanded that Taiwan, West Germany, Japan, and Switzerland restrain their exports of machine tools, with some market shares rolled back to 1981 levels. Other countries were warned not to increase their shares of the U.S. market.

— Accused the Japanese of dumping roller bearings, because the price did not rise to cover a fall in the value of the yen. The U.S. Customs Service was ordered to collect duties equal to the so-called dumping margins.(45)

— Accused the Japanese of dumping forklift trucks and color picture tubes.(46)

— Failed to ask Congress to end the ban on the export of Alaskan oil and of timber cut from federal lands, a measure that could substantially increase U.S. exports to Japan.

— Redefined “dumping” in order “to make it easier to bring charges of unfair trade practices against certain competitors.”(47)

— Beefed up the Export-Import Bank, an institution dedicated to promoting the exports of a handful of large companies at the expense of everyone else.(48)

— Extended quotas on imported clothespins.


21 posted on 07/30/2015 5:36:46 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Why don’t you embrace your inner socialist and vote straight Dem ticket?


22 posted on 07/30/2015 5:37:45 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I couldn’t care less what you opinions are or who you might or might not vote for.

But you always respond, kind of counter intuitive.

23 posted on 07/30/2015 5:37:59 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You are confusing things Marx was a Free Trader, like you are.


24 posted on 07/30/2015 5:38:44 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: central_va

When telepathy is invented or discovered, that will be rendered unnecessary.


25 posted on 07/30/2015 5:39:52 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: central_va

We’ve played this game before. Obama placed tariffs on Chinese tires. Does that make him a protectionist?


26 posted on 07/30/2015 5:40:07 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

What makes you think he doesn’t?


27 posted on 07/30/2015 5:40:29 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What? They ran out of laborers?


28 posted on 07/30/2015 5:40:43 AM PDT by Daffynition ("We Are Not Descended From Fearful Men")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Oh, please . . . quote Marx again, and show us that you agree with him. That never fails to crack me up, like the time you posted it, and went on to argue that the Baltimore riots were a result of free trade, as Marx predicted.


29 posted on 07/30/2015 5:43:23 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; central_va
Some dimwit who is afraid to link to Cato, because Cato felt that Reagan wasn't a free-trader enough.
30 posted on 07/30/2015 5:45:59 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
We’ve played this game before. Obama placed tariffs on Chinese tires. Does that make him a protectionist?

No. It was a good thing though. Clearly the Chinese were dumping tires on the USA. I was sold tires that were Chinese made, Khoumo[SIC], I didn't know they were Chinese they told me it was Japanese, it is very hard to find USA built tires. Well on one of the tires the steel/fiber belt was about 2 inches to short. I noticed a bubble one day and the dealer took off the tire and showed me the manufacturing defect. He said IHO it was ready to explode at high speed. So Free Trade can kill. Not to say that another brand could have had the same defect but I've not heard of that problem. I mean the belt too short? The way they make tires is you put the belt on a machine which coats the tire in rubber compound. If the belt is too short it is painfully obvious that the belt should be thrown away. Zero quality control.

31 posted on 07/30/2015 5:49:45 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You are a Marxist tool and don’t like that being pointed out to you. I don’t blame you really.


32 posted on 07/30/2015 5:51:07 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: central_va

And you are not a tool, but a fool. Quoting Marx, agreeing with him, and disregarding any attempt to make you believe otherwise.


33 posted on 07/30/2015 5:52:47 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: central_va

And for the thousandth time, we don’t have free trade with China, you idiot.


34 posted on 07/30/2015 5:53:52 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The thing of it is the empirical evidence is that Marx was correct, at least in this regard on Free Trade.


35 posted on 07/30/2015 5:54:36 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
As background reference, Dongguan is basically across the bay from Hong Kong so not too surprising it embraces high tech.


36 posted on 07/30/2015 5:54:45 AM PDT by newfreep ("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You want to post the tariff schedule for imported Chinese goods? Then post the Chines tariffs schedule for our goods imported into China. Or how about the latest trade deficit with your ChiCom buddies you kowtow too? Otherwise STHU.


37 posted on 07/30/2015 5:56:50 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Ghost town?


38 posted on 07/30/2015 5:57:51 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Why the heck should I google the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States for you? Can’t find it? Then what are you blathering-on about here?


39 posted on 07/30/2015 5:59:12 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Well now we are getting somewhere. You are a Marxist, “at least.”


40 posted on 07/30/2015 6:00:28 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson