Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this the plane of the future?
The Daily Telegraph ^ | 27th July 2015 | John O'Ceallaigh

Posted on 07/28/2015 2:36:31 PM PDT by the scotsman

KLM's sleek and streamlined AHEAD aircraft is one of many proposed aircrafts that could radically change the way we fly

'The plane of the future could well be a sleek and streamlined aircraft with a “blended wing” if proposals by the Delft University of Technology in Holland and Dutch carrier KLM come to fruition.

A blended wing is one that is seamlessly connected to the plane rather than attached separately to the fuselage and it’s one of a number of innovations that has been mooted as a result of the AHEAD study the two organisations collaborated on. Standing for Advanced Hybrid Engine Aircraft Development, the study saw academics, manufacturers and aviation experts consider how higher-tech aircraft could be developed and the aviation experience enhanced.

The prototype plane’s proposed silhouette would minimise drag and so reduce fuel consumption. A totally new engine design would provide better efficiency too, with a hybrid engine and other complicated technological amendments further finessing performance.

More precise details can be found in KLM’s report on the development, but the general public is unlikely to see the results of this study in reality until about 2050. Though a long way off, it is the latest ambitious proposal for a radically different type of commercial aircraft.'

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: blendedwing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: central_va

Winglets and directional thrust engines, I would presume.


21 posted on 07/28/2015 3:36:00 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Oh. that is sexy!


22 posted on 07/28/2015 3:38:58 PM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

How does one land in a cross wind with no rudder?


23 posted on 07/28/2015 3:43:01 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

We have basically been refining the last commercial plane design of the 747 for 45 years, since it went into service in 1970.

Except for the Concorde from 1976-2000, there have no radical advancements in commercial aircraft design.

When you look at the aviation progress from 1945 to 1970, it was a revolution of design in just 25 years.

Since then, not so much.

I look forward to the future.

It is tiresome to sit in a tube like cattle.


24 posted on 07/28/2015 3:43:29 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
My 2 cents: That canard is going to keep this thing out of a lot of airports.
Just not enough runway.

It killed the Starship (among other things) - having the complexity (and weight) of a variable sweep canard to get the stall speed down and landings shorter.

25 posted on 07/28/2015 3:59:45 PM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You crab into the wind and take out the correction in close. I don’t fly heavies, but I think that is the technique for the 737, even with a big tail.


26 posted on 07/28/2015 4:14:11 PM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Few windows, carries 800 people. Probably all standing up crammed together. Yup, that’s the future.


27 posted on 07/28/2015 4:14:56 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I wouldn’t say there hasn’t been any advancement, but the price structure of commercial flying isn’t going to support cutting edge aviation development. Basically we have seen a transition to two engines, winglets, and manufacturing with composites. To me the most exciting thing in a while is the shape of the 787 wing. If you study it, it looks more like a bird wing than anything I’ve seen.


28 posted on 07/28/2015 4:20:07 PM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Looks like the Enterprise J.


29 posted on 07/28/2015 4:25:04 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (With the things that are about to come to light. People might just need a little old-fashioned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

How do you correct yawl WITH NO RUDDER?


30 posted on 07/28/2015 5:07:11 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: central_va
>> How do you y'all correct yawl?
31 posted on 07/28/2015 5:16:31 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republican Freed the Slaves" month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You have to have fly by wire flight controls that use a combination of the control surfaces you do have to correct for yaw.


32 posted on 07/28/2015 5:27:14 PM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
There is no way to apply force in the vertical axis without a rudder. I still do not get it.


33 posted on 07/28/2015 6:29:45 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You can use a combination of spoilers and ailerons/flappers a. The B-2 and UCAV vehicles are already doing it. It does require fly by wire to convert the pilots desired inputs into appropriate control inputs. Even with no pilot inputs, the flight control system will be constantly working to keep the aircraft flying straight.


34 posted on 07/28/2015 6:44:16 PM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit; the scotsman

Vincent Burnelli, was the inventor of the lifting body, winglet and a number of other important progressions was he not?


35 posted on 07/28/2015 9:57:15 PM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson