Posted on 07/27/2015 10:31:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
Joseph Rivers, an aspiring artist from Michigan, had his dreams shattered by federal agents. On a train to California, where he was going to start a video production business, he had his $16,000 in life savings seized by the Drug Enforcement Agency under the mere claimed suspicion that it was going to be used as drug money. A hunch or suspicion is enough for some law enforcement agents to seize someone's property and hold it until they prove themselves innocent.
As the Albuquerque Journal, which first reported Rivers' case, quoted the DEA agent in charge: "We don't have to prove that the person is guilty. It's that the money is presumed to be guilty."
This is the process of civil asset forfeiture, and some conservatives are now fighting back.
This summer, Rivers was in Washington, D.C. as a panelist on civil asset forfeiture reform for a summit put on by conservative groups Americans for Tax Reform and Right On Crime.
"There was nothing I could do," Rivers said. "I tried to ask him why, and he never really gave me a reason other than that he believed it was involved in illegal activities."
We are in the age of law enforcement reform. Incidents of alleged police misconduct from Ferguson to New York to Baltimore have put the national spotlight on the myriad number of ways that police can and have abused well-intentioned laws in order to insert themselves into the lives of innocent civilians.
After the tough-on-crime 90s, the conservative side of the political spectrum has often been presumed to be more friendly to law enforcement. With a proliferation of groups like the Institute for Justice and Right on Crime, and the launch of criminal justice reform projects at conservative mainstays like the Heritage Foundation and FreedomWorks, that tide has turned.
"It's a civil liberties issue, it's a due process issue, but first and foremost, it's a property rights issue," Jason Pye, director of justice reform for FreedomWorks, said. "This is legal plunder. What they're doing is wrong, and we need to fix this... I've been surprised at how activists have embraced this issue."
Asset forfeiture revenues to law enforcement agencies have skyrocketed since the 1980s. It's not hard to understand why: legal reforms put in place both at the federal and state level in those years allowed law enforcement agencies themselves to keep the funds from civil asset forfeiture proceeds rather than have that money directed to general state and federal funds. This created a perverse incentive for law enforcement to pursue asset forfeiture in order to increase their own funding.
"People were watching Miami Vice, and criminals had nicer cars and houses than they did. So we passed these laws, and it turns out it doesn't only affect Colombian drug lords," said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. "They assert that they're only going to go after the bad guys... but it trickles down to hit all sorts of people."
The U.S. Department of Justice's asset forfeiture fund was valued at over $1.8 billion in 2013, according to the Institute for Justice. State and local governments often don't publish information on their seized assets, but data from the joint federal-state Equitable Sharing program shows that states profited to the tune of over $658 million in 2013 alone - and because of the lack of data, that's far from the true number for assets seized by state and local authorities.
This isn't trivial. Civil asset forfeiture has become a moneymaking scheme for state and local agencies.
"Law enforcement agencies should be adequately funded," said John Malcolm, director of the Heritage Foundation's Center for Legal and Judicial studies. "But they should be funded through the general appropriations process, not through forfeiture."
This is one of the reforms panelists agreed would make a difference: redirecting forfeiture funding to general funds rather than being able to use them as a way to directly fund law enforcement agencies. In a Heritage Foundation publication, "How Civil Asset Forfeiture Turns Police Into Profiteers," they outline a few other needed reforms: raising the burden of proof for asset forfeiture, reaffirming the presumption of innocence, requiring reports on forfeiture assets for those that don't have them, eliminating the joint federal-state Equitable Sharing program, and others.
"This is an assault on property rights," Norquist said. "It unites folks on the right and left, and it's one of those issues in the next several years that we can get something done."
Great...more LEO bashing.
/sarc
This practice by “law enforcement “ is illegal. Giving it a nice name doesn’t make it legal. Passing laws to allow it doesn’t make it legal, since those laws are invalid.
“”We don’t have to prove that the person is guilty. It’s that the money is presumed to be guilty.””
2+2=5
Law enforcement agencies do not have a target on their backs. Civil forfeiture laws do. If an agency is using a bad law to persecute the innocent they deserve to be brought to task for it.
Wasn’t Loretta Lynch a big player in this activity in New York? And I seem to remember it didn’t even come up in her confirmation hearings, not even by conservatives... who apparently want that swag too. They disgust me.
“Fourth Amendment - we don’t need no steenkin’ Fourth Amendment...”
2+2=5For sufficiently large values of 2 ...
-- snip --
Career in New York
Eventually moving to New York, Lynch worked as a litigator at the firm Cahill, Gordon & Reindel from the mid-1980s until 1990. It was that year that she took on a governmental position, working as prosecutor for the U.S. Attorney team of New York’s Eastern District. In 1994 she became chief of the Long Island Office, and after several years was appointed top assistant to U.S. Attorney Zachary Carter.
-- snip --
FIFY
So, where have they been at for the last 30 years?
The Fed agencies dealing with drugs need to be disbanded. It’s the DEA that protects Mexican cartels and the CIA that protects the poppy crop in Afghanistan and then ships in the opium. The prison industrial complex benefits (BTW, the prison companies are big hitlery donors), the fed agents benefit with promotions and bribes. Big Dem PD no doubt still get a cut of the dough from the gangs.
Time to take away the Fed enforcement of drug laws. If states want drug laws they can look at the range from Singapore to Netherlands.
Civil Asset Forfeiture where the person is not charged with anything, is a criminal act in my book.
It’s just like the Kelo decision except with eminent domain they have to pretend to pay you something.
Actually, any leo who is taking money from innocent people deserves to have a target on his back, just like any other armed robber.
Due process!!!
Civil forfeiture is wrong!! Change the law!
Per one article I found, the agent in charge said he can’t comment as the investigation is still “ongoing”... IOW, still trying to find a way to keep his money....
Part of this is anti-smurfing laws dealing with cash transactions under $10,000 - they literally make it illegal to do something in a way that’s not illegal.
NM list PING!
I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics
To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keywords
To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages
(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)
New Mexico did - As of July 1, forfeiture is prohibited until conviction of a crime. Proceeds go to the state's general fund, not local or state police departments or sheriff's office.
Absolutely. The supporters of the war on drugs brought us this insane crap. It's reason enough all by itself to oppose the "war on drugs".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.