Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

Now just a cotton pickin’ minit here. Let’s be fair. Kurdistan wouldn’t be another Arab state, it would be a Kurdish state. And furethermore, so many of the present Arab and Islamic states have large deposits of oil, and if a Kurdish state is formed, they’ll only have some that do will no longer be able to exploit Kurdish lands for a huge chunk of their oil revenues. So therefore, a Kurdish state would be a disaster for Arabs and Iranians. And what about the Turks and the Syrians? Don’t they deserve to occupy lands that don’t belong to them and oppress their indigenous populations, too?


12 posted on 07/27/2015 5:05:30 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5

Eleutheria, if I’m not mistaken, a “Kurdistan” that includes ALL the territories where Kurds are in the majority would include not only the oil-rich Kirkuk region of Iraq, but also that part of Turkey which contains the headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates. That thought alone must terrify both the Turks and the Syrians.


13 posted on 07/27/2015 9:59:06 PM PDT by eddiespaghetti ((with the meatball eyes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson