Posted on 07/24/2015 7:42:44 PM PDT by South40
The gunman who opened fire inside a packed movie theater in Lafayette, Louisiana, Thursday night, was 59-year-old John Russell Houser, police said at a news conference today.
((snip))
Houser also supported Barack Obama. He wrote this in his Manifesto (why do mass murderers always seem to have a rambling manifesto?)
I accepted this it came to me that the president is doing exactly what Tim McVeigh did,only the president is much more effective.The way I see it,the faster he wrecks this nation, which in no way resembles what it’s founders envisioned,the faster working people with morals may re-assume command.ie I was for his re-election. I like his spending habits.etc……
Obviously, he was not the average tea partier the media is making him out to be.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Easy...they're not anarchists. As you pointed out, they're left wing moonbats....and liars....Next question.
this shooter was not coming from the left wing..he came from the right and I would be very reluctant to argue otherwise.
How did you determine that, did he have great reverence for our founding documents, maybe he had the federalist papers on him?
he was not a lefty, despite some lame attempts to show otherwise, like his admiration for Hitler. He admired Hitler because Hitler got rid of the riffraff of society.
Are you implying that Hitler was a great admirer of limited government and unbridled freedom? Hitler was a totalitarian, a left wing nutjob. It was known as the National Socialist Workers Party (NAZIs for short).
Just as he admired Obama for destroying the US that he believed was sick...That’s not left wing..and it’s out of the park for the right as well.
Just as he admired Obama for destroying the US that he believed was sick...That’s not left wing..and it’s out of the park for the right as well.
Wait a minute, admiring Obama is "right wing" Boy have you got your wires crossed. Obama is a communist, just another kind of socialist.
It’s where the far fringe elements of both have something in common.
Wrong again honey.
Real anarchists (I shrunk the government too much) are hermits, living away from "civilization" who don't bother anyone unless you mess with them. Real anarchists DO NOT ORGANIZE.
Well, you and they are wrong.
That's a bit of propaganda taught in poli-sci classes from time immemorial, a tool used to demonize American Constitutionalism and promote socialism.
Most violence in recent history has come from the left. (Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il, the KKK, the domestic savages here in the US)
Do you believe in Gaia? Anthropogenic Global Warming? Peak Oil?
Well Duh!
The Klan was established to keep blacks from voting for Republicans. Now they have the NAACP. (which was originated by Republicans, but co-opted and destroyed by the black socialists.
What is your issue with me bub..?
You are wrong about a number of things, but I am not going to tell you which things they are.
We are done.
My issue is you posted to me. I answered.
You believe the socialist model, I believe the American model. Our founders were practically anarchists....real ones.
We are done.
Bless your heart.
No...I'm not.
You are dumb as a rock...
It’s so obvious but you can’t see it, or maybe you do and are trying to lay it on me.
The subject of this thread and yourself are like two peas in a pod, and you think he a lib. Your wrong...dead wrong.
In normal times I would think that is funny.. you know....funny haha...
But today, I think it’s like a bad premonition. It’s very unsettling..
You lie!
So now you're calling me a murderer?
And you, who thinks Hitler was a freedom-loving Republican?
You say the nicest things, sweet-talker.
So you do believe in Gaia, Anthropogenic Global Warming, Peak Oil, and the circular "political spectrum" hoax.
I rejected all of that over a decade ago.
Love how you project your own failures on me..
I rejected all that crap in the 60s.
But you are wrong about the spectrum’s circular nature. You misunderstand it intentionally in the same way that you fail again to understand the writings of the latest movie theater maniac.
He’s a pro God, pro gun, anti-social because he believes society is immoral and sick.
His un-medicated, untreated progressive mental illness caused him to see evil and then place the responsibility on himself to eradicate it. There is no telling exactly what he was thinking when he pulled the trigger. His attempt to escape indicated that killing himself was only the last option. If he had escaped he would have gone to another theater that same day.
He’s not hard to understand. But you are so blinded by your ego that you can’t open up your eyes to read and to understand what he said.
The reason I compared you to him was not to say you are also mentally ill, it was to say the sane guy, could have easily posted here and you would have agreed with his posts.
Of that, I have no doubt.
I rejected all that crap in the 60s.
AHA!
So you confess!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(Not all that stuff was even around in the 60s, maybe Gaia and the poli-sci circle-jerk. The "climate scientists" were still talking about the coming ice-age scare. And "peak oil" was a turn of this century RAT-hoax.)
Yeah, because I'm an American, not some Eurofilth socialist.
There is no "far right" or "far left" on a circle, but there is on a clearly delineated line graph. My socialist social-studies teacher tried to sell me that concept in high-school. There is also no place on that circle for US Constitutional conservatives.
the sane guy, could have easily posted here and you would have agreed with his posts.
No, I wouldn't!
Anyone that admires Hitler has my deepest visceral abhorence. My family came here to escape that murdering psycho, and in fact we lost people to the camps.
Actually no, peak oil, (they did not use that term) was predicted then when they claimed we had no more than 60-100 years of oil and 250+ years of coal left.
As to the global warmers, the same academics were them global coolers....in fact they had plans to paint the arctic with black paint to absorb the warmth of the sun and all sorts of crap.
As to Gaia, I never heard about it until it was referenced in a scifi television show.
The circular political spectrum is not a hoax. What some people object to is that they put Hitler on the right side top, and the USSR on the left side top.
Some people contend that hitler was leftist (Conservative American view) and the Europeans believe he was more on the right. All agree he is at or near the top of the chart.
The reason Europeans put him on the right is because of their politics. ours are somewhat unique or at least they were before we started to adopt European socialism.
The fact is, that although the word socialist appears in their moniker, Hitler hated Communists with a vengeance. On the other hand he was a vegetarian which points more to the left in the US only, not in Europe.
He was a good friend of Mussolini, a fascist, and Mussolini also hated communists.
Whether you object to the placement of these historical figures on the charts left or right is not really all that important because we are Americans and have our own political map....so to speak..But you cannot object to how the Europeans see it and the facts.
In my view, from a American perspective, Hitler was a populist and had right leaning and left leaning views. he had to be that way to appeal to the majority. Most of his officer cadre was right leaning with some exceptions. (in my view) The majority of the people however were on the left because they believed that capitalism and democracy had failed them.
But no, the circular nature of ideology is hard to miss. You really have a difficult time assigning a label to those at the top of the circle where they merge. That's why it's a legitimate theory. So one can argue indefinitely about the placement of certain historical groups and figures. To me, I prefer not to engage in something that is fraught with European/American differences of opinion.
My family immigrated in 1923 after the Russians invaded Georgia.
The far right and far left are indeed on the circle graph. The problem is that you are looking a circle and trying to define it in a linear way.
Let's do a experiment.... There are dozens of circular graphs published, so take the one you find less objectionable and cut it at the top of the circle where the far left and far right meet. You will then have your linear line graph. It's the same damn thing, but the major difference is that at the extremes the circular graph shows that the extremists may share some of the same goals. But not the same labels..
As do I, but that is not necessarily a political view from any non-American or European. The American left does not claim him either. This is a great example of what I am talking about.
As you have certainly read articles posted here about the Ukraine conflicts, you would know that there are paramilitary right wing groups fighting the Russian backed incursions.
These right wing groups are called right wing because they admire and place Hitler in a high position in their history. They too hate communists, the left, and their ancestors fought them in the name of Hitler.
So you see, politics may be a bit more complicated then just right and left as a American might see it.
Not if you're a Euro-weenie socialist.
What some people object to is that they put Hitler on the right side top, and the USSR on the left side top. Some people contend that hitler was leftist (Conservative American view)
That would be me.
and the Europeans believe he was more on the right. All agree he is at or near the top of the chart. The reason Europeans put him on the right is because of their politics.
That would be you.
ours are somewhat unique or at least they were before we started to adopt European socialism.
I already said that.
The fact is, that although the word socialist appears in their moniker, Hitler hated Communists with a vengeance. On the other hand he was a vegetarian which points more to the left in the US only, not in Europe.
Nobody said he hated socialists. The Communists and the Nazis would have gunfights in the streets of Germany before they both ascended to power.
He was a good friend of Mussolini, a fascist, and Mussolini also hated communists.
They and the Communists are all far left-wing murdering control freaks.
Whether you object to the placement of these historical figures on the charts left or right is not really all that important because we are Americans and have our own political map....so to speak.
Once again, I already said that.
But you cannot object to how the Europeans see it and the facts.
Of course I can, I'm an American. And the USA had to bail out the wrongheaded Euro-socialists twice. It's probably about to happen again, I hope we stay the hell out of it.
Now that you've conceded all my points, why are you defending the Eurofilth and telling my how stupid I am?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.