Posted on 07/24/2015 8:01:34 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Leading Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton embraced Planned Parenthood on Thursday, defending the nation’s largest abortion provider during a campaign speech in Greenville, South Carolina, and later in a statement from that speech posted to Twitter. Planned Parenthood has been under fire recently after videos were released showing its officials glibly discussing trafficking in body parts of aborted babies.
Hillary Clinton Defends Planned Parenthood as Corporations Flee Abortion Provider
Kristinn Taylor Jul 24th, 2015 9:43 am 1 Comment Hillary Clinton Young Cons
Leading Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton embraced Planned Parenthood on Thursday, defending the nation’s largest abortion provider during a campaign speech in Greenville, South Carolina, and later in a statement from that speech posted to Twitter. Planned Parenthood has been under fire recently after videos were released showing its officials glibly discussing trafficking in body parts of aborted babies.
“Hillary stands up for Planned Parenthood—and women’s rights.”
“It is unfortunate that Planned Parenthood has been the object of such a concerted attack for so many years. It’s really an attack on a woman’s right…to make the most personal, difficult decisions that any woman would face.” Hillary Clinton July 23, 2015
Clinton’s embrace of Planned Parenthood came on the same day as the Daily Signal reported several large American corporations have retreated from being identified as supporting Planned Parenthood.
The Daily Signal also reported that Planned Parenthood has taken down from its website a list of corporate sponsors.
“Representatives from Coca-Cola, Ford Motor Co. and Xerox say they’ve asked Planned Parenthood to remove their names as corporate donors to the embattled organization.
“The move follows a Daily Signal report revealing the names of 41 companies that Planned Parenthood listed as donors. That list, which was featured on Planned Parenthood’s website, has since been removed.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
I think what is going on is this:
Planned Parenthood gives a House Representative or a Senator so much money to campaign and when the Rep or Senator attains the chair, then Planned Parenthood demands the money back....isn’t this called ‘money laundering’?
Isn’t this what the ‘mob’ did to business people...you pay us this amount or we will hurt your business or you????
Just remove their names as donors, or have they actually STOPPED their donations? Wondering why it was worded so unclearly.
Just keep talkin’, Hildebeast!
Polls show a proportionate correlation between the frequency of her jaw flappin’ and her decline in popularity. LOL.
How much does PP donate to The Clinton Foundation ?
The so called 'mob' was run out of the illegal drug business. They had the abortion business (illegal at the time) as a side venture. It is their MAIN INCOME PRODUCER now. So, to answer your question, yes it is what the 'mob' did because it is the 'mob' still doing it.
Planned Parenthood isn’t doing anything new. Consider the ‘humanitarian’ experiments conducted by the nazis:
“With a view to the planned experiments with a new sleep-inducing drug we [I. G. Farben] would appreciate it if you could place a number of prisoners at our disposal (…)” – “We confirm your response, but consider the price of 200 RM [Reichsmarks] per woman to be too high. We propose to pay no more than 170 RM per woman. If this is acceptable to you, the women will be placed in our possession. We need some 150 women (…)” – “We confirm your approval of the agreement. Please prepare for us 150 women in the best health possible (…)” – “Received the order for 150 women. Despite their macerated condition they were considered satisfactory. We will keep you informed of the developments regarding the experiments (…)” – “The experiments were performed. All test persons died. We will contact you shortly about a new shipment (…)”
It is a cartel system which started 100 years or more ago.
That was the purpose of the Rockefeller and Carnegie and Ford foundations, etc.....a money laundering scheme to give themselves “kudos” (make them appear “Good” and “Kind” when they were evil Robber Barons who destroyed all their competition) and at the same time they gained complete control over most universities (all research results) , all MSM newspapers, all publishing companies, all churches, so they could control the “perceptions” of the masses.
The big one was with the Humanist, John Dewey who destroyed education of our children to make them into ignorant, immoral, puerile OWS drones. They took over the minds of our children to shape and program them, (operant conditioning and psychological warfare in curricula) with lies and embedded artificial emotions of fear of “thinking outside the box” by that system of “group think” using peer pressure, which had successfully created the Hitler Youth mind.
Now, with the tax system, they actually are using OUR money to buy and control or bribe our politicians and SCOTUS. If they don’t need to bribe them, like Kagan, it is because they are infiltrators and traitors, simply hard core, vile, Marxists.
My guess: a LOT.
Stick a fork in Hillary - she's done.
So are they stopping donations, or are they requesting to keep their donations anonymous?
Ok then by what I just read:
Obuma wanted to ‘re-do’ the health care system and he knew he had to have Reps and Senators behind him, plus he had to have the medical and pharmaceutical companies behind him to pull this off, so all this money and time exchanged hands, and promises were made like ‘if I get my health care plan then you get this from this company and you get this from that company, say planned parenthood, then you all owe me x amount of money for me getting this done...’
and this is how our government works now, so all the reps and senators are in on it and they come back to us and tell us what we stupid sheeple want to hear them say and after they are elected they go back to Washington and keep doing the same thing over....
So as the saying goes: “If you do the same thing over and over again and get the same results then isn’t that insanity?” So who is to blame for the government being in the shape it’s in????
She is the world’s only living abortion after all.
Pretty much.
....why are they still there????
They have government protection.
Several companies yesterday refuted having having donated to PP directly from corporate charitable giving including Coke, Ford and Xerox.
PP’s corporate sponsors, about half, released statements saying that they matched employee contributions to any 501(c)3 charity. It could have been PP, it could have been Wounded Warrior etc. They didn’t discriminate. If the organization was tax qualified they matched employee giving.
The only alternative these companies had/have was to discontinue all corporate charitable matching of employees if they wanted to cut out PP from its list. We’d have a field day with companies that started tossing out matching funds for charaties we approved of or endorsed. The only alternative in this day in age of hyper partisanship is to grant all or nothing.
In all fairness to those corporate listed sponsors the following fall into the “We match employee contributions but do not specifically donate to PP out of corporate charitable funds.” Or released statements refuting general contributions to PP.
Avon, Clorox, Levi’s, American Cancer Society, United Way, Macy’s, ExxonMobil, Verizon and American Express. Interestingly enough that’s only 6 for profit enterprises that released statements to the general effect of what I’ve listed.
Adobe, AT&T, Bank of America, Bath & Body Works, Ben & Jerry’s, Converse, Deutsche Bank, Dockers, Energizer, Expedia, Groupon, Intuit, Johnson & Johnson, La Senza, Liberty Mutual, Microsoft, Nike, Oracle, PepsiCo, Pfizer, Progressive, Starbucks, Susan G. Komen, Tostitos and Unilever were all companies or organizations that have released no statements on the controversy or how corporate money ended up with PP.
I think you can bet that several of the easily identified “progressive” leaning companies have zero crisis of conscience and several more of those are shaking in their boots thinking “By God, what have we done.”
Flat out one of those companies is going to get crushed in a wave of bad PR and the market will react accordingly. Probably in a fashion that makes Carbonite’s woes seem tame in comparison.
I don’t know if more companies have released statements but there is my source.
Lets stand up this time and vote WHO we want to vote for without them scaring or threatening us to vote as THEY want US to do...
I doubt they didn't know their names were supporting Abortion, but now
that the baby murdering monsters are ousted publically they can't afford to
remain within in their Vogue stature.
Code Pinko and others will certainly picket them at some point for more shakedown money.
I’m wondering the same thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.