Looks like Hillary is going to throw Craig Livingstone under the bus again...
Posted on 07/24/2015 5:14:20 AM PDT by jimbo123
The New York Times made small but significant changes to an exclusive report about a potential criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's State Department email account late Thursday night, but provided no notification of or explanation for of the changes.
The paper initially reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation "into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state."
That clause, which cast Clinton as the target of the potential criminal probe, was later changed: the inspectors general now were asking for an inquiry "into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state."
The Times also changed the headline of the story, from "Criminal Inquiry Sought in Hillary Clinton’s Use of Email" to "Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account," reflecting a similar recasting of Clinton's possible role. The article's URL was also changed to reflect the new headline.
As of early Friday morning, the Times article contained no update, notification, clarification or correction regarding the changes made to the article.
One of the reporters of the story, Michael Schmidt, explained early Friday that the Clinton campaign had complained about the story to the Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Why the change? Follow the money...
“Why the change?”
One of the reporters of the story, Michael Schmidt, explained early Friday that the Clinton campaign had complained about the story to the Times.
Paging dr goebels
Just like it’s never the thug or crazy person who is responsible, it is the gun... Now it isn’t Clinton who is responsible, it is all the fault of that darn email account. Must be the server’s fault.
Pinch must have gotten a hot call from Podesta.
NYT
Rewriting history is our specialty.
Of course she knew and has since treated the world to yet another demonstration of the incompetence, arrogance and deceit which has ever been her response to objections about her conduct or impediments to her ‘career’!
NYT: All the News that Fits Our Views
Legal action might involve (1) an FBI investigation, and, (2) the US DOJ---both in the grip of Obama so political hijinks loom. (3) a congressional committee, with subpoena power.
Here's a fourth option: a six-month investigation: indicated the Clintons diverted tens millions of dollars that they solicited for specific Foundation charitable purposes (that were found to have been diverted to the personal enrichment of themselves and their close associates).
THIS IS CONSIDERED MAIL FRAUD Raising money for a specific cause that was diverted elsewhere is considered mail fraud.
REPORT MAIL FRAUD HERE:
https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
If the FBI, DOJ and IRS won't shape up to nab the conniving Clintons, the US Postal Inspector has been known to lock-up many crooks for using similar scams.
NYT: We use “1984” as a training manual.
Circa 2010--Ex-Pres Clinton in Moscow having a laugh w/ Putin.
as strategic US uranium deposits were sold off to Russia for Big Bucks.
Do you actually believe:
<><>Obama was oblivious to the Clintons jerking around US foreign policy?
<><> Obama knew nothing of Hillary and Sid Blumenthal's emails WRT Iran (the man Obama banned from US govt employment)?
<><> Obama knew nothing about the Clinton Foundation/slush fund buck-raking activities?
<><> Obama never noticed Bill Clinton trotting around the globe?
<><> Obama never noticed the Clinton "charity" used to worm his way into the confidences of foreign leaders....
but only those leaders w/ untapped reserves of gold, uranium, oil, and other valuable commodities?
================================================
THE FACTS ARE THESE---WE, THE PEOPLE, NOTICED Hand-picked by Obama to run State, Hillary ran it like a shadow govt....w/ her husband taking notes WRT buck-raking opportunities available from Hillary's actions OR inaction.
Obama never noticed that Secy Hillary never e-v-e-r uttered a discouraging word e-v-e-r......as the Clinton Foundation sucked up hundred of millions of foreign dollars from shady characters. The avaricious Clintons devised hundreds of obscure programs to collect billions.....bragging about do-goodism, how the money was supposedly dispersed to "assist" endless charitable projects.
No question----Obama's protecting the Clintons---b/c they're his meal ticket. The Clintons deposit Obama's cut into his two (cough) "foundations." All of them are living happily ever after--getting rich on other people's misfortune
If someone acceptable to the Dem elite were to jump into the race (Biden, Gore, Warren), Shrillary would be dead meat. The NY Slimes would lead the charge.
How accommodating of the NYT and rest of the compliant “press”.
Fourth estate, fifth column. Thoroughly in the tank.
It’s going to take more than a nip here and a tuck there to pretty her up.
“All the news that’s fit to alter”!
Probably got a purple-faced screaming call from Bubba.
And the Politico actually reported it?
Something is definitely wrong in Utopia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.