Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats slam sanctuary city legislation, labeling it 'The Donald Trump Act'
The Hill ^ | July 22, 2015 | Mike Lillis

Posted on 07/22/2015 2:00:00 PM PDT by maggief

House Democratic leaders are slamming GOP legislation aimed at discouraging sanctuary cities, characterizing the proposal as "The Donald Trump Act" in a bid to embarrass the Republicans bringing the measure to the floor this week.

The proposal, which would withhold federal law enforcement funds for state or local governments that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration agents, comes in response to this month's fatal shooting of Kathryn Steinle along the San Francisco waterfront, allegedly by an illegal immigrant with a long criminal history.

The House vote on the Republicans' sanctuary city bill is scheduled for Thursday, and it is expected to pass.

Trump, the billionaire real estate mogul, stirred a hornet's nest of controversy when he launched his GOP presidential bid in June with accusations that most Mexican immigrants are criminals — remarks he's amplified since Steinle's death. The Democrats are citing Trump to highlight their criticisms that the Republicans' bill represents a similar attack on immigrant communities.

"We can do all the politicking we want. We can do the so-called 'Donald Trump Act,' which simply denies the cities and towns their dollars to hire police officers while attacking immigrant communities," Rep. Xavier Becerra (Calif.), head of the House Democratic Caucus, said Wednesday in reference to the GOP's floor agenda. "Or we can actually do things that improve the lives of Americans."

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) piled on, accusing the Republicans of exploiting the Steinle killing to promote a long-held agenda of "making the local police an arm of the federal government."

Lofgren emphasized that Democrats want a thorough review of policies related to illegal immigrant criminals — a review that she and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) requested of the administration on Tuesday. But she also warned that the GOP bill, by blurring the lines between federal and local law enforcers, would erode community trust at the expense of public safety.

"With community policing, you need to make sure that the entire community is free to call the police, to serve as a witness, to be part of fighting crime," said Lofgren, the senior Democrat of the Judiciary Committee's subpanel on immigration and border security. "This bill would obviate that, and if you didn't comply by becoming the immigration police you would lose all of the federal funding that help[s] you enforce the laws."

The issue of sanctuary cities has gained national prominence since the death of 32-year-old Steinle, who was killed on July 1 while walking with her father along San Francisco's popular waterfront.

The suspect, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, was released in April by local law enforcers who, citing San Francisco's sanctuary status, defied a request from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials that he be held while they launched deportation proceedings.

Trump pointed to the tragedy as vindication that his earlier depiction of southern-border immigrants was on the mark.

"This is merely one of thousands of similar incidents throughout the United States," Trump said. "[T]remendous infectious disease is pouring across the border."

The remarks have won him strong praise in certain conservative circles, and recent polls put Trump atop the GOP primary field. But they've also raised concerns among national Republican leaders, who are trying to woo Hispanic voters they see as crucial in a number of battleground states in 2016. Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, has privately urged Trump to tone down the rhetoric.

On Capitol Hill, Steinle's death has prompted a flurry of legislative activity, largely among Republicans aiming to eliminate local sanctuary laws.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced legislation Tuesday that, like the House bill, would tie certain federal grants to the willingness of states, cities or law enforcement agencies to cooperate with federal officials in holding or transferring undocumented criminals.

"There is no good rationale for non-cooperation between the feds and state and local law enforcement," Grassley said Tuesday during his panel's hearing on the issue.

Upping the pressure on Congress, Steinle's father, Jim Steinle, urged the Senate panel to move on legislation "to take these undocumented immigrant felons off our streets for good."

"Due to unjointed laws and basic incompetence of the government, the U.S. has suffered a self-inflicted wound in the murder of our daughter by the hand of a person that should have never been on the streets in this country," he said.

Still, the Republican proposals have found strong critics among local law enforcers, many of whom say they simply don't have the authority to detain illegal immigrants beyond the time allowed by local law, federal detainer or none.

"Local agencies cannot be expected to take on these additional duties," Tom Manger, chief of police in Montgomery County, Md., and president of the Major Cities Chiefs Association, told the Senate Judiciary Committee. "It is right to call upon us for actions to protect the public from crime and violence, but it is wrong to demand that we engage in matters that relate solely to immigration status."

Rep. Joe Crowley (N.Y.), vice chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, noted the regional considerations surrounding the sanctuary cities debate. Condemning the Republicans' bill, he argued the importance of unhindered communication in combating problems — including sex trafficking, domestic abuse and gang violence — unique to multicultural urban areas, like his district in Queens.

"In denying funds, federal funds, to cities like New York to hire police officers to engage makes their jobs so much more difficult when they cannot count on the advice and the information coming from the broader community, the general population, including the undocumented communities where there's exploitation of workers … that they need to be able to expose. That would be lost," Crowley warned.

"It's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; aliens; brownsupremacy; california; charlesgrassley; donaldtrumpact; election2016; embarcadero; franciscosanchez; invasion; joecrowley; kathrynsteinle; mexico; nancypelosi; newyork; sanctuary; sanfrancisco; texas; tommanger; trump; xavierbecerra; zoelofgren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: maggief

Have you noticed how CNN seem very pleased with Donald Trump and they are giving him lots and lots of air time. They are doing this because they believe that they are giving him enough rope to hang himself. Boy are they out of touch. They have given Trump lots of opportunity to get his message throughout the land. He is just getting his message out to more and more people. Wait till he goes after the Democrats.


61 posted on 07/23/2015 6:38:19 PM PDT by cradle of freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

I concur on must; for the rest if ONLY if the Fed. got out of the thieving/welfare ring all together.

We already see what happens when cities, not even States, are allowed to thwart immigration policy (I suspect they are breaking LOCAL law, not only Fed). To think that illegals would not use a liberal city policy to ‘stage’ and scatter....

If the damage done were to be contained to those States w/ a liberal policy, I’m all for the 50-different experiments.


62 posted on 07/24/2015 6:08:54 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73; All
(I suspect they are breaking LOCAL law, not only Fed).

One problem with local immigration / sanctuary laws is this. Low-information local government leaders may have based such laws on the wrong premise that the corrupt feds have the constitutional authority to regulate immigration.

63 posted on 07/24/2015 8:38:20 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Ha. If we had even LOCALS giving two hoots about the Constitution, we wouldn’t have the library of ‘laws’ already on the books!

Worse, the same whom cannot read/comprehend the 9th and 10th vs. Constitution to figure the same = not fit for office, let alone passing bills into Law.


64 posted on 07/24/2015 9:25:46 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson