Posted on 07/08/2015 4:51:37 AM PDT by ThomasMore
Name one.
Barry? Hillary? your next door neighbor that had an abortion so she could fit into her bikini on her Bahama trip?
Thats your OPINION. Please say “IMHO” from now on.
Federal crime stats. Go read them. It aint VRWC conspirators or Bhuddists doing all that is it? No.
Now I have to move on, because you do not make except for one post, any sense. Goodbye. Click. On mental ignore.
The only right post on this thread.
Now that Intent has been removed from proving Housing Discrimination (one of the four psychotic SCOTUS decisions from a week and a half ago), the door is wide open. IT DOES NOT MATTER if you actually discriminated, if the neighborhood does not have the “correct” numbers, you are guilty, and the redistribution can continue, with zero proof of actual discrimination. You lose your home, the “correct people” get your home, and it is “for justice”. Just like in Zimabawe, where is also worked really well. Ahem.
A racially integrated community is a chronological term timed from the entrance of the first black family to the exit of the last white family. - Saul Alinksy
Ethnic Cleansing plain and simple.
Any objective data, or were you able to observe all that from next door?
They just don’t get city level riots and murders. But then they are thousands vs millions in population.
What about Gary, East St. Louis, and Camden. Small populations, but murder rates that are second to none.
Fedreal crime stats show that liberals and people supporting liberal pols, liberal dogma and whatever liberal causes pop up are behind all the major criminal issues in America and always have been.. The rarity of a non liberal stands out.
Is it Baprist preachers murdering or liberal drug dealers? Is it the local conservative get off my lawn guy raping children or the liberal Nambla backer?
Sorry you don’t like facts. But they are facts.
Check the racial component of those "safer" liberal towns. Or are you incapable of intellectually honest investigation into your own inquiries?
Both. Go read the crime state in those states. I didn’t hack their database and plant the numbers.
Well the rest flows from him so why are you arguing with me?
You ever looked at an apartment which accepts Section 8 housing vouchers? Do you want to live there?
Guess what, they want to do that to every city, sub-division, and established province in the United States!
When they don’t pay for it, they don’t CARE ABOUT IT! Which means my property value is going down, my security is going down, my peace-of-mind is going down!
This top-down, social engineering that Liberals and Progressives want is nothing short of Pol Pot-worthy!
True, but in addition the libs who want to force that outcome will also force the taxpaying victims of their vote-buying scheme to pay for it as a crucial part of their "fair" housing scheme. You can be sure that the libs who are pushing this scheme won't suffer any loss of property value or increase in crime if they get the outcome they want for the rest of us.
Yup, it’s the enforcement mechanism thats most important here.
The Progs have spent decades getting states and localities hooked on Federal funding. Taking it away would be like making a junkie go cold turkey.
It does point to a way around this, utilizing a very democratic (small d) model: hold town meetings, lay out exactly how much money comes in from the Feds, where it goes, how much state/local taxes would have to be raised if the Fed cash spigot were turned off and let the citizens VOTE on what to do.
Full transparency of that sort would be incredibly enlightening to a lot of people, particularly in regards to how the system really works. It might just spur a big increase in civic involvement and a swing of the political pendulum back in the other direction.
I did. That was my point. Whites, whether liberal or conservative or whatever, have low rates of crime.
This is all about demolishing our last firebreak against the complete Liberal takeover of this country.
The two lesser publicized SCOTUS rulings (”disparate impact” and approving independent redistricting commissions) lay the groundwork for the Dems to smash our ability to gerrymander lasting Congressional majorities.
The Left lies awake in bed all night thinking of these things.
I already looked => http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/vtcrime.htm Looks very safe to me. Am I missing something?
Thanks again, Amerika, for putting this putz in the White House.
What the King has spoken, the King has spoken. Hop to it, peasants!
Not only does it represent social engineering, in pursuit of a Compulsion For Uniformity--the grossest form of totalitarian tyranny. It is particularly offensive, if one understands the motivation that brought a great many of the original European settlers, whose descendants produced our federation of republican States.
Many of those who settled in New England & Connecticut represented groups that had been at war with the groups from which the settlers of Virginia and the Carolina had emigrated--as visa versa. These as other settlers in other States had obtained charters to develop communities, which catered to a desire by settlers to live in congenial communities with a sense of kinship, common values & common norms.
I realize that some "Conservatives" have allowed themselves to be conditioned, either from fear of being slandered, or the simple but endless iterations of unthought out attitudes, to be blind to the enormity of what is being done here--what was done by the very notion that "Fair Housing" is a denial of the basic motivation for much of the settlement of the America, we know. But this blindness has to be addressed.
Why? Because it is not just that this policy is fundamentally a utilitarian collectivist assault on the very concept of personal freedom. Breaking up the unity of local communities; creating in their place incongruous communities of people with different values, different identities, different histories, etc., clearly destroys the potential for any effective resistance to an all powerful, overreaching Government. Remember, that while Virginia & Massachusetts still had different values in 1776, they had strong communities, able to embrace a common cause that respected those differences, even as it agreed on common purpose.
It was not an accident that the granted powers to the Federal Government did not include any authorization to impose any State or community's particular moral values & priorities on any other. The Government was established to secure the Blessings of Liberty to the original citizens & their posterity. It was not established to destroy them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.