"I'm just an innocent victim of circus pants."
Posted on 07/05/2015 8:28:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The Hillary Clinton campaign’s “Dinner With Hillary” contest has slightly different fine print than past Clinton campaign contests. The rules have been altered so as not to explicitly exclude illegal immigrants from entering.
As The Daily Caller reported, the Clinton campaign’s “Meet Hillary” contest, which closed for entries June 5, prohibited DREAMers from entering or winning prizes.
“Promotion open only to U.S. citizens, or lawful permanent U.S. residents who are legal residents of the 50 states, DC or Puerto Rico and 18 or older (or age of majority under applicable law),” according to that contest’s fine print.
But the new “Dinner With Hillary” contest, which closes for entries July 30, is open to citizens and non-citizens alike.
“PROMOTION OPEN ONLY TO INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE UNITED STATES CITIZENS OR WHO RESIDE IN THE FIFTY (50) UNITED STATES, PUERTO RICO OR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND ARE OVER THE AGE OF 18 (OR THE AGE OF MAJORITY UNDER APPLICABLE LAW),” according to the new contest’s fine print.
Did you catch that? The concept is open to citizens “OR” individuals who reside in the United States, D.C., or Puerto Rico. But NOTHING about “legal residents” or “lawful permanent U.S. residents,” like the previous contest.
TheDC has reached out to the Clinton campaign regarding these contest eligibility rules.
“The Promotion and these Official Rules will be governed, construed and interpreted under the laws of the State of New York without regard to its or any other jurisdiction’s choice of law provisions,” according to another passage of the fine print. “Entrants agree to be bound by these Official Rules and by the decisions of Sponsor, which are final and binding in all respects.”
The contest saddles its winners with a series of costs and taxes.
“Except as expressly set forth in the description of above, winner and his or her guest are responsible for ground transportation to and from the airports and hotel, all other meals and all other expenses that winner and his or her guest incur in connection with the Prize,” according to the rules.
The approximate retail value of the prize is $1,900, which means that middle-income winners will be forced to pay $475 in taxes on their winnings.
I don’t think I could sit through a dinner, any meal with that individual present. I’m sickened at just the thought of it.
Hillary needs the illegals for slave labor.
does that include their translator???
ICE should crash the party...
“And our main course is FILET OF QADAFFI! We came! We saw! We killed him! Now, I’m going to eat him! Hahahahahahaha!!!!”
Justice: some ISIS illegal immigrants win the dinner with Hill.
Hilarity ensues.
What kind of absolute Tool would you have to be, to for one second think that the “Winner” of this “Contest” wasn’t hand picked by Hillary, well before the first entry was ever submitted?
I will be a Black or Hispanic, single mom, with issues requiring government assistance. Duh...
State attorney generals need to be typing up the charges about illegal lotteries being run again.
Obama got caught doing this in 2008 and stopped.
He did it again in 2012.
And you have to be a legal citizen to give financial contributions to candidates. The Clintons, Gore, and Obama all have been busted taking millions in illegal campaign contributions.
You pay me $100,000 and I might consider it... Same as some of you speeches yes?
Monty Python did a sketch about the effects of having dinner with Hillary and it ain’t pretty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXH_12QWWg8
Umm, do you see the Confederate Navy Jack behind her in that photo?
Dinner with Hillary? What does the winner get?
When do the Secret Service members just say,
“I quit. I can’t protect people who are so stick-stone stupid anymore.”
Thumbing her nose at the law, as usual.
Is that not just the SWEETEST THANG? Hillary is too treacherous for words.
Nice catch, obviously she is a RACIST!
She needs to be confronted about why she has been a RACIST and needs to repent and repudiate her RACIST past.
Here's another version without the flag...
Is that the *man-spread* they’re talkin’ ‘bout?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.