Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Local churches say no same-sex ceremonies (Hobby Lobby ruling should eliminate being forced on this
Corsicana Daily Sun ^ | 6/29/2015 (30 minutes ago) | Deanna Kirk

Posted on 06/29/2015 3:49:49 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

While the Supreme Court of the United States ruled Friday that same-sex marriage is legal in all 50 states, several religious leaders in Corsicana said Monday they will not hold a same-sex wedding service in their churches. ...

Pastors of several churches cited Biblical teachings for their stance. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at corsicanadailysun.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catholic; churches; hobbylobby; homosexualagenda; libertarians; marriage; medicalmarijuana; obamanation; religion; rfra; samesexmarriage; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck

Maybe go back to the original question I am replying to?

He is asking what are the effects if churches had to operate as “Hobby Lobby-style business”. That’s why I am saying there wouldn’t be any volunteers, because businesses do not have volunteers, they have employees, who are regulated by various state and federal laws.


41 posted on 06/29/2015 4:49:54 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I have prepared more than 10,000 tax returns over 30+ years. I can safely say that those who tithe do so without concern about income tax. I can also say those who do not tithe don’t think about tax savings until they file return and then want to claim what they did not actually pay. The effect of your proposal is a tax increase on Christians which is something I find offensive. You want to extend it to all charity to be fair then okay.


42 posted on 06/29/2015 4:51:03 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
As soon as what a court was dealing out didn’t even rise to the level of being wrong, but being nonsense...

I thought things were bad in Roe V. Wade, they went nonsensical back then. But then they hewed to law again.

Lately, they don't bother with such trivia as 'law' or 'definitions of words'. Why would they bother with tradition!

43 posted on 06/29/2015 4:51:26 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The new GOP slogan: "Vote for us!!! We are exactly the same as the Democrats !!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Well that is a cavil that does not understand the actual situation. That means WHERE APPLICABLE.


44 posted on 06/29/2015 4:52:29 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

It’s the way they pay salaries, and the property tax schedules. Those are the two that will reduce their ability, and income tax deductions. Say for someone like me who donates over 5K a year, I can absorb that tax elimination. But some people can’t and just won’t give anymore. We’ll see what happens soon. The Democrats have wanted to put a gag on the Churches. (Which is weird because they campaign in Black Churches all the time)


45 posted on 06/29/2015 4:52:53 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
So even if you couldn't deduct it, the church wouldn't have to claim it as income? (According to IRS, a married couple can give " $28,000 on or after January 1, 2013 (including 2014 and 2015)."

Bible-believing Christians will still support their churches, tax exemption or no. In fact, the more willing the church is to vocally defend biblical morality, the more willing believers will be to support it.

46 posted on 06/29/2015 4:52:57 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I’m just answering the question, I’m not sure what you want from me. If you think it’s a silly question, tell that to the guy that asked it.


47 posted on 06/29/2015 4:58:58 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

get the Church out of the State has now become Get the State in the Church


48 posted on 06/29/2015 5:00:24 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Go look up mutatis mutandis. If you want to misunderstand something go right ahead. You’ve already shown how you do that in other fora.


49 posted on 06/29/2015 5:03:55 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The issue will soon cut past “biblical morality.” It will reach that of sin and Savior.

As long as we are stopping at morality, we are really concerned with how nice life on earth is.


50 posted on 06/29/2015 5:05:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Churches should stop having anything to do with the government paperwork. A religious ceremony in church is obviously protected by the First Amendment. The married couple should take care of the government paperwork on their own.

Go one step further: Get the Government out of the Marriage "Business."

A marriage license exists for the following reasons:

1. It's a tax. Dating back to the 1600's in England when the King decided to tax all marriages to increase his treasuries. The State Government's do the same. It's a tax.

2. It's the entry point of a civil contract between a man, a woman, and the State. That civil contract defines what happens should a marriage dissolve. It defines who gets what, child support (if applicable) spousal support (if applicable) and other terms of the divorce.

I say, get Government out of the Marriage business.

How? Heterosexual couples should SHUN getting a marriage license. Have a simple religious ceremony at a church of their choice and be pronounced man and wife.

Period. End of Story. Sit back, watch the individual states thrash without the income from marriage licenses.

51 posted on 06/29/2015 5:12:06 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Again, if you have some issue with the question, go take it up with the guy who asked it.


52 posted on 06/29/2015 5:12:34 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

There are other taxes to consider. Real estate tax, business license, usually based on gross receipts, personal property tax and on and on and on.


53 posted on 06/29/2015 5:18:58 PM PDT by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Just quit holding wedding ceremonies of any kind in churches. Invite a preacher into your home for a wedding ceremony & keep it simple.


54 posted on 06/29/2015 5:32:10 PM PDT by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhema

It’s a gift. You can give gifts to anybody you want.


55 posted on 06/29/2015 5:44:47 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("One man with a gun can control a hundred without one." -- Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I tithe knowing that salvation is by grace alone. But by tithing, I give the church the additional means to facilitate the spreading of the Word, the children a suitable place to worship, pastor and staff to deliver the Word, and missionaries the means to continue. Not sure how loss of non-profit status would really change that or the church.


56 posted on 06/29/2015 6:19:49 PM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Heterosexual couples should SHUN getting a marriage license. Have a simple religious ceremony at a church of their choice and be pronounced man and wife.

You have a great point. If marriage is a basic human right as SCOTUS ruled, then you don't need no stinkin' license. There is nothing in the Bill of Rights that requires a license. The rights are God given and inalienable. What you suggest would be an extremely interesting test case. I hope someone pursues it.

57 posted on 06/29/2015 7:15:55 PM PDT by randita (...Our First Lady is a congenital liar - William Safire, 1996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: randita
You have a great point. If marriage is a basic human right as SCOTUS ruled, then you don't need no stinkin' license. There is nothing in the Bill of Rights that requires a license. The rights are God given and inalienable. What you suggest would be an extremely interesting test case. I hope someone pursues it.

Thank you, you get it. I'd be happy to be the test case, problem for me is I've been married for 29 years. :-)

If the USSC did in fact use the term "basic human right" then you're exactly correct that no license would be required.

Wonder who/when the first "test case" will pop up. You and I can't be the only people in the US who's figured this out .....

58 posted on 06/29/2015 7:23:36 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I took liberties when I wrote “basic human right”. I have not read the entire ruling..

“They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law,” Kennedy wrote of same-sex couples in the case. “The Constitution grants them that right.”

Before now, marriage has been deemed a privilege and like most privileges (driving, concealed carry, e.g.), licenses were required.

Now it’s a right and licenses are not required for rights.

Couples who get married in the church should send a copy of their wedding photo or church wedding bulletin to Fedzilla and say put us on record as being married. Period. End of story.


59 posted on 06/29/2015 7:37:33 PM PDT by randita (...Our First Lady is a congenital liar - William Safire, 1996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: randita
Now it’s a right and licenses are not required for rights.

Depends on what state your in, example 2nd Amendment. Some states require license to carry, others are "Constitutional Carry."

Couples who get married in the church should send a copy of their wedding photo or church wedding bulletin to Fedzilla and say put us on record as being married. Period. End of story.

That would be the end goal, and that would effectively shut down "gay marriage." There is no BIBLE BELIEVING CHURCH that would perform a homosexual marriage.

Step 1: get the Government out of the marriage business. How? REFUSE TO GET A MARRIAGE LICENSE, CHURCH CEREMONY ONLY!

It's simple, and it should work.

60 posted on 06/29/2015 7:48:47 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson