Telling On Themselves: Rural Cleansing in Idaho and Montana

I just love it when someone slips up, and tells us country folk what’s really being planned for us.

Rural cleansing is the purposeful removal of rural citizens from the countryside and the relocation of rural populations into urban areas. Many public officials and media pundits scoff at the mere suggestion that rural cleansing is taking place, but the problem, you see, is that there are people who have inadvertently left tell-tale clues we can use to piece together things for ourselves.

One of the most startling clues I’ve run across lately comes from a July 1, 1998 newspaper article in The Montanian, which is published in Libby, a tiny rural town in Northwest Montana.

In the article, Libby County Commissioner, Rita Windom, informs us that she and other commissioners were approached by Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks (FWP) state land manager, Darlene Edge, with a proposal to cooperate in driving rural residents out of the Montana countryside into cities. When commissioners responded with horror, Windom says Edge replied

“Can’t you see we are doing you a favor by forcing people to move from rural areas into the urban areas. That way you can close roads…Why don’t you work with us and move these people out of the rural areas and into the urban areas so cities can shoulder more of the responsibilities and the county can save money?”

This exchange took place in a meeting regarding a document called The Wildlife Program Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), of which only 300 were published. According to Windom, there was very little public input because the few public meetings held were so poorly advertised.

But was this just an isolated, though shocking, incident? Did this public policy only affect Montana? I don’t think so. I’ll tell you why.

Sometime around 1997 I called a Boundary County, Idaho resident from Washington State regarding possible job openings in my field in Boundary County. Her answer was that the woods had been shut down and 300 families had left. She continued on to tell me she had seen a public land management agency document outlining a plan to empty North Idaho of people and turn the entire area into a wildlife corridor. Naturally, she was outraged.

About ten years later, another reliable eyewitness told me that the same document had arrived at his home first. The document was marked not for public view. He had purchased a house that had previously been occupied by a public land management agency employee who had moved. My source had opened the document and read it. He confirmed that it said what my other friend had previously described to me. In fact, he had lent her the document, which is how she happened to know what was in it.

I was never able to get my hands on that document, but when someone sent me a camera shot of the above article in The Montanian describing much the same policy being announced at much the same time as the eyewitness accounts, I wasted no time in getting a copy of the article.

Other evidence for believing that this article in The Montanian represents policies that affect Idaho, as well as Montana, is that, not too long ago, at a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service public meeting about listing the wolverine on the Endangered Species list, we were told that Idaho and Montana are now considered to be in the same management region by the U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The land and wildlife management policies are pretty much the same now. This is why huge blocks of land, taking in N.W. Montana, Northern Idaho and N.E. Washington, are included in management plans for grizzly habitat, caribou habitat, wildlife corridors, etc.

Commissioner Windom remarks, in the Montanian article, that the Draft EIS that had upset her and other commissioners was the product of five to six years’ labor by the FWP. That puts us back to around 1992, or a year later, when the Rio Earth Summit trotted out the document, Agenda 21: the Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet, and other supporting documents, for our enjoyment.

Documents and resolutions introduced at the Rio Earth Summit had been in the works for years before being introduced to the world.

Policies leading to rural cleansing are found in the document, Agenda 21: the Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet, but another important source is associated with one of the other documents introduced at Rio. That was the Convention on Biological Diversity. It has been shown that the Wildlands Project is the central mechanism by which the Convention on Biological Diversity is to be implemented. The Wildlands Project calls for humans to be removed from one-half of the American land mass, and to create uninhabited corridors for wildlife to move freely from Alaska to Yellowstone Park, or farther south. It was written by radical environmentalists working in United Nations nongovernmental organizations with the full knowledge and aid of U.S. federal agencies such as U.S. Forest Service, BLM, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, EPA and others.

It appears that the Wildlands Project is now being implemented, under another name, in Idaho and the West through the Western Governors Association’s Wildlife Corridors Initiative (WCI). To learn more about that, please see my blog, Infiltration of LittleTown U.S.A.: The Wildlands Project and Agenda 21 in Idaho. Particularly, pay attention to the section subtitled “Nudging Us into the Cities.”

If we are paying attention, we can catch public officials and media pundits additionally telling on themselves by their perpetual use of disinformation. One common bit of disinformation used to mislead the public is the repeated statement that Agenda 21 is an outdated and nonbinding document. You can always tell a trained operative when statements similar to this come out of their mouth. Here is an article displaying this strategy: How the U.N.’s Agenda 21 Affects Kootenai County, Idaho.

Just two to three weeks ago, I submitted a comment on the above article. I commented that Agenda 21 is no outdated or irrelevant document, because in 2012, the United Nations held another summit called Rio+20, in which the members reaffirmed Agenda 21 as the working document for the 21st century. They also reaffirmed their commitment to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The webmaster declined to publish my comment.

To back up my comment, here is a quote found on Wikipedia’s entry for Agenda 21:

“Rio+20 (2012) Main article: United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development In 2012, at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development the attending members reaffirmed their commitment to Agenda 21 in their outcome document called “The Future We Want”. 180 leaders from nations participated.”

When the Wikipedia entry calls the Agenda 21 document a voluntary and nonbinding action plan, the writer fails to outline the process whereby former President Clinton issued an executive order and created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD), which then formed policies and plans to implement Agenda 21 under soft law. Sustainable Development is the term used at United Nations and national levels to describe the goals of Agenda 21. The PCSD generated documents and guidelines, notably Sustainable America: A New Consensus for the Prosperity, Opportunity and a Healthy Environment for the Future, used by federal agencies, such as the Forest Service, EPA and others, to form policies.

These guidelines have become the overarching vision for our nation, not only for federal agencies, but also for city planners, corporate trade groups, and environmental groups, as this excerpt from Sustainable America shows.

Federal grants, monies, and other inducements, have drawn local and state governments into that implementation. I’m sure many of those public officials were ignorant of the consequences of accepting those grants at the time. Some are either still ignorant or too stubborn, or maybe even too complicit, to admit that they were duped. When soft law becomes the new normal, it can be upheld by case law. These practices are also now being codified in piecemeal legislation, comprehensive land use plans and zoning regulations.

Now you will be told that county comprehensive land use plans, likewise, are nonbinding documents with no real clout. Oops—wrong again. For example, the U.S. Forest Service uses comprehensive land use plans when writing forest plans for your region. If your plan just happens to agree with their goals (and what are their goals? why, Sustainable Forestry, of course) the plan serves as cover for their management policies, because the Forest Service claims that they have coordinated with your county, as required by law, by having read and taken under consideration your comprehensive land use plan. See this video and hear F.S. employees state this over and over again, as they are being questioned regarding their latest forest plan for Idaho. I have also read that comprehensive land use plans can be used as a basis for zoning regulations and other county ordinances.

This is why various groups want to embed statements that are conducive to Sustainable Development in your county comprehensive land use plans.

Though the disinformation campaign strategy in Idaho is still one of denial and Alinsky-like mockery of Agenda 21 conspiracy theorists, as exemplified in this Spokesman-Review article, the strategy is now shifting elsewhere. Rosa Koire, speaking of California, describes how the charge of conspiracy theory is there giving way to the position that Agenda 21, and its related documents and policies, are real, but that these policies are the only feasible and just way of coping with global problems such as climate change, overpopulation, poverty and environmental degradation.

It’s no surprise, then, that FOX News just published an article entitled Foundations plan to pay news media to cover radical UN agenda. The article describes how a cadre of journalists is being trained to win the public over to U.N. Sustainable Development policies.

I will check that website tomorrow; I've overdone it today but got on a roll.

I've not seen you around FR for some time. You are the one who recommended the book Alone in the Taiga, something like that. I got it and couldn't put it down. I remember Agafiya was the lone survivor.

Maybe you should think about packing up your boys and heading for Russia. I've often thought that there may be more opportunities there now than here and lots of land. I'm too old and my family most are too messed up to adapt to any new country as an expat but that only means if things get really tough here, they won't handle it well at all and don't have the skills to deal with it. I don't know if I could deal with it.

But Russia could get very bad again. You never know. I'd feel better if they would bury Lenin once and for all but maybe it would upset the balance with some who still are Communists. I guess I don't understand it really. Like I don't understand the sudden obsession with the Confederate flag. I never associated it with racism, just the Civil War, and I think the Union soldiers took too much revenge on the south after they lost the war.

I stumbled by accident on you tube a video in Russian which I tried to learn but only remember a couple words. Anyway, not too far into the video I thought, "this looks familiar." It was about Agafiya's family and how they lived while the father was still alive. It was exciting to see the real deal heaven knows where in Siberia.

You should all note that I did not question the size of the wolf -- just the validity of that particular photo.

Here are some observations on that photo:

I've examined it closely, and, if it is a "'Shopjob", it is, technically, fairly skillfully done. IOW, it looks far more authentic than 0b0z0's so-called "Birth certificate"...
The wolf in that photo was either photographed lying on his side, and then was trimmed and pasted in -- (see #47)
OR -- The Wolf was dead and rigor mortis was well-developed. (Note the straight-out forelegs (as in #47) -- and compare them with the "drooped" forelegs/paws in the other photos/)
I have a 140-lb dog, and have tried to put him (tranquilized at the vet's) into the back of our van. it took two of us, because he was like wrestling 140 lbs of jelly!
Most telling, I defy any ordinary human to pick up a big animal like that -- without "doing a dance" to get/keep your feet under you and under the animal's center of gravity. IOW, where is the "trampling"in the snow where the lady hoisted the critter -- or where others helped her hoist it?
Anyway, if that woman actually is holding that heavy critter like that, I certainly wouldn't be inclined to "mess with" her! '-)

FYI: yes, we are retired back home on the ancestral family farm in the far Northeastern Texas Piney Woods. Here, deer are almost a plague -- and they love to graze on the well-maintained ROWs of Texas' Farm-to-Market roads -- like the one we live on.

But, our main "pest animal" are feral hogs. Hitting a deer is bad news, but hitting one of those hogs at highway speed usually means a totaled vehicle...

Their meat is so rank that it will contaminate venison that comes into contact with it. But, a long soak in cooler with several changes of ice and rock salt can render it somewhat edible...

Getting a "bead" on one through the thick timber here is extremely difficult. But, I just had 60+acres of timber "row thinned" -- so, I now have lots of "clear shot lanes" to rectify that problem...

~~~~~~~~~~~~

On the main subject of the article:

There is a move afoot to re-populate our area with the near-extict "Red River Wolf". But, knowing the "SSS" proclivities of these East Texas Rednecks, that will probably be an uphill battle... '-)

Agenda 21 is treasonous and evil.

Glad I live in Texas although I am certain there are areas of the state being targeted by these treasonous, fascist animals. I wish somebody(s) would just make a list of the leaders and the minions and start picking them off.

Why suffer the death and mess of a civil war in order to protect property rights and independence. Just take out the globalist minions who carry out the treason against the nation and our people on the low down. Make it a deadly, accident prone ideology, agenda and profession in America. One could be seen as killing them before they round up and kill us.

I’m not saying I want this to happen at all. I would never dream of having anything to do with such a lawless reaction against lawless officials and minions. We should settle this unelected foreign power and abuse problem, through our dishonest elections and politicians like we always do.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.