PHOTO AT LINK.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Brad from Tennessee
But no tail guns anymore, dammit.
42 posted on
06/24/2015 2:13:27 PM PDT by
Demiurge2
(Define your terms!)
To: Brad from Tennessee
46 posted on
06/24/2015 2:39:05 PM PDT by
TNoldman
(AN AMERICAN FOR A MUSLIM/BHO FREE AMERICA.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Brings back memories of when I was a radar fire control system analyst for old “Buff.” I worked on the D and G models.
In England (Lakenheath) I worked on F-100s and at Carswell I was a civilian ART Tech on F105 TSII fighters.
Those were good planes and could do a hell of a lot of damage.
I only know of 2 aircraft that really “earned their stripes” through the ages: The C-47 and the B-52.
47 posted on
06/24/2015 2:47:09 PM PDT by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: Brad from Tennessee
The standard loadout for this plane includes... That is a list of munitions that the B-52 can carry. She can not carry them all at once. You must pick and chose depending on the mission.
49 posted on
06/24/2015 2:53:44 PM PDT by
SunTzuWu
To: Brad from Tennessee
One very large can of whoop ass.
5.56mm
52 posted on
06/24/2015 3:07:55 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: Brad from Tennessee
Bubble chaser on D and E B-52s.
60 posted on
06/24/2015 4:08:55 PM PDT by
Don_Ret_USAF
("No Government can survive Without The Trust Of The People.")
To: Brad from Tennessee
Would not surprise me if they keep the B-52 flying until 2100 at least. Except for electronics, aircraft technology has generally plateaued from the early 1960’s to now.
62 posted on
06/24/2015 4:14:17 PM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(Barring a reformation, Islam Delenda Est.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Dunno for sure, might be the B-36, but the B-52 could have been capable of carrying these crowd pleasers:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson