Posted on 05/27/2015 2:18:45 PM PDT by drewh
I’m amazed I am not driving past pillars of salt every day.
This line of “evolution” away from a time-honored definition of matrimony has been followed before. Somehow, it always presaged the collapse of a civilization and the demise of a once-powerful nation.
There might not be a road back for generations, but the error of the current “evolution” will be recorded once again, and the old ways shall revert.
They can if they choose to. That's what makes humans different.
Thank God my parents were not “scientifically correct”.
Whatever the rest of the world does, I have zero interest in a married man. I don’t care how attractive or rich or funny or whatever else. If he cheats on his wife he would cheat on me. Besides, I don’t like the idea of being one of a harem. No thanks. I don’t get people who do, though I have known a few. In the cases I’ve seen it has had to do with loneliness. I’ll never be that lonely. I don’t want to be that sort of person. I don’t want to hurt another person in that way. I don’t want to be associated with a cheat. Neither do I want it for my own future when he would tire of me.
Monogamy or nothing. Faithfulness is a required character quality.
How very “Brave New World”
Monogamy is frowned upon.
Mother and Father are obscenities.
This is just the homosexual deathstyle being promoted to normal people.
Then again it was an alien wizard that made tiger woods cheat...
Sounds like LCBTQ agenda is in there.
hence the dramatic rise in STD and AIDS as one of the benefits ...
Hillary would agree, monogamy is so 20th century. Bill was just ahead of his time.
gotta love how LIBTARDS refer to “studies” and “trends” and other braod brush made up “facts” to back their positions and opinions but seldom any FACTS...
is it possible her one study was HERSELF... I THNK SO...
I suppose science without morality would leave people to think rape and murder were natural to humans. In a way they are. But they are not moral and understanding that is what separates us from mere animals — or it used to.
I don’t know who “Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist and one of the world’s leading relationship researchers” studied under but she doesn’t seem to understand that monogamy was an essential evolutionary adaptation needed to fulfill the needs of large brained but slow developing offspring. Since the child was born with a brain that was still developing over a multi year period, a stable family unit was essential. Of course the logical gender adaptations are simply unacceptable and thus wrong to the feminists who are rearranging family structure out of existence.
Biology vs. ideology.
And children don’t need a mother and father.
Let’s see, between this and Rush’s example today of the article telling us how much more “tolerant” we are today of immoral behavior, this has been a really depressing day.
First, dogs do not mate for life. They mate all their lives, true, but anyone who has been around free ranging dogs knows very well that they most certainly do not mate for life.
Monogamy leads to intact families
Which leads to success in life
Which leads to independence
Which leads to fewer people in the underclass, dependent on liberals
Which leads to less power, money, and sex for liberals.
We cannot allow that.
And these are the people calling Christianity extreme!
Interesting this fornication advocacy is happening at the same time as gay marriage. Perhaps these hedonists know gays aren’t faithful to one person and are trying to change marriage to accomadate that.
She’s just trying to get readers. I looked at her FB page and she and I assume her boyfriend look pretty cozy. Be ashamed if he cheated on her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.