Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the Supremes Slap Down 4th Circuit’s Anti-Business Ruling?
American Prowler ^ | 5.26.15 | Hans Bader

Posted on 05/26/2015 1:03:44 PM PDT by nickcarraway

In the past, businesses have been happy to put new factories in states like South Carolina and Virginia, due to their right-to-work laws and relatively reasonable employment laws. But they should think twice about doing so in the future, thanks to some recent, very unreasonable court rulings against employers in those states by the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Those decisions illustrate a contempt for binding Supreme Court precedent, and basic rules of logic, evidence, civil procedure, and appellate procedure

A classic example is the Fourth Circuit’s 2-to-1 decision on May 11 in Brown v. Nucor Corp., which violated fundamental rules of appellate review and class-action procedure. Essentially, the court allowed a class action lawsuit alleging racial discrimination in promotions to be brought based on statistics that other courts (like the Eighth Circuit) have correctly rejected as unreliable junk science, in rejecting class actions lawsuits against the very same company. Compare Bennett v. Nucor Corp., 656 F.3d 802 (8th Cir. 2011).

It also permitted the plaintiff to make internally contradictory arguments to get that junk science into evidence, improperly put the burden of proof on defendant to disprove the admissibility of evidence, and allowed the plaintiff to make arguments it had waived by not including them in its opening brief, but rather putting them into its reply, where the company never even had a chance to rebut them.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 4thcircuit; fourthcircuit

1 posted on 05/26/2015 1:03:44 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Liberal activist judges. It’s about the result, not the law.

And we can’t let there be any job growth in those Right to Work state.


2 posted on 05/26/2015 2:34:55 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

tar and feathers..

it is about keeping activist judges in their place..

until this starts to happen, we are all screwed


3 posted on 05/26/2015 3:15:05 PM PDT by joe fonebone (Time to put the taxpayer first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Importantly, the 4th circuit has 11 Democrat appointed and only 7 Republican appointed judges, with one recess appointed by a Democrat (Clinton) and confirmed by a Republican (Bush2).

And 7 of the Democrats were appointed by Obama.

This explains why they either do not know the stare decisis (precedent), or they do not care what it is.


4 posted on 05/26/2015 3:16:00 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson