Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Army Raising “Concerns” Over CMP Transfers
FPC Blog ^ | May 24, 2015 | Evan Gillespie

Posted on 05/24/2015 12:41:01 PM PDT by OK Sun

U.S. Representative Mike Rogers (R-Alabama) made headlines recently when he introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2015 (H.R. 1735). The amendment allows for the transfer of surplus 1911A1 handguns to the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) for sale to the general public.

Last week, in response, the U.S. army released a white paper voicing “concern” over this amendment and claimed that there would be “potential negative impacts on public safety from the large amount of semi-automatic and concealable pistols that will be released for public purchase.” These concerns included the traceability of the firearms after sale, and the applicability of the Gun Control Act of 1968.

Public safety concerns revolved around the fact that there is “no statutory requirement or record keeping obligation for CMP,” which could make it difficult for federal agencies to track some firearm transfers, once they are completed.

As John Richardson of No Lawyers – Only Guns and Money notes, though, the Civilian Marksmanship Program has stringent standards that must be met by an individual before they can acquire a firearm from this program. These firearms are not released to any person who inquires – they must be non-prohibited persons and meet CMP’s eligibility requirements. . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at firearmspolicy.org ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; alabama; army; banglist; cmp; guncontrol; marksmanship; mikerogers; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
Hard to believe military standards have fallen so low that people like this can be found in decision making positions. Does anyone know who in the Army wrote this position paper?
1 posted on 05/24/2015 12:41:01 PM PDT by OK Sun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

“These concerns included the traceability of the firearms after sale...”

Oh, so they do trace...


2 posted on 05/24/2015 12:45:29 PM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'about' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

I’ll take one, thanks.


3 posted on 05/24/2015 12:45:57 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

>>Hard to believe military standards have fallen so low that people like this can be found in decision making positions. Does anyone know who in the Army wrote this position paper?

Today’s military is run by civilians and officers who learn to think like civilians. Future George Pattons are weeded out at O-3.


4 posted on 05/24/2015 12:46:53 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

One of 0bama’s plants, no doubt, sounding off under his boss’s order.


5 posted on 05/24/2015 12:48:59 PM PDT by W. (Animals are much stupider since Noah's Ark, because of inbreeding.--Oglaf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

>>I’ll take one, thanks.

I shot a lot of 1911’s in my military days. All were worn-out crap. For years afterward, I was convinced that all 1911’s were junk until someone handed me a brand-new Norinco in 1992. It felt like a different gun. Then, I tried a new Colt Series 80 and could not believe that it was the same gun as the junk the military handed me.


6 posted on 05/24/2015 12:50:44 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

So full sized, low capacity, worn out pistols that were manufactured at the lowest bid during the Eisenhower administration somehow presents a special hazard to our society?


7 posted on 05/24/2015 12:52:36 PM PDT by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

The military should be more focused on just who eventually gets the hardware that they and the BATFE give away to furrinrrs....


8 posted on 05/24/2015 12:54:09 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun
Does anyone know who in the Army wrote this position paper?

The same dumb ass that wrote the paper calling for the replacement of the 1911 with that piece of crap Beretta, probably.

No...actually that would have been too long ago, but they breed them the same...shave tail lieutenants with a butter bar, with aspirations of being another MacArthur, coupled with having drank obama's koolaid.

9 posted on 05/24/2015 12:54:46 PM PDT by OldSmaj (obama is a worthless mohametan. Impeach his ass now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun
Concerns: The Army and DOJ have concerns with this amendment and believe additional study is necessary. Specifically, the Army is concerned about loss of accountability of weapons after transfer to CMP; expanding the scope of CMP’s mission to include handguns; and the potential negative impacts on public safety from the large amount of semi-automatic and concealable pistols that will be released for public purchase.
10 posted on 05/24/2015 12:55:32 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

This was, obviously, written by a ‘career’ officer, worried
that the best thing made by American John Moses
Browning, should not fall into the hands of the lowly
American, who pays that man’s salary, with their sweat
and toil and taxes.


11 posted on 05/24/2015 12:57:38 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

It tells you a lot about Obozo and minions true intent with us.

They are afraid of US.


12 posted on 05/24/2015 12:57:44 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

I want that gun. I just wrote down the model number. If the riots spill over here I will need one. Thanks.


13 posted on 05/24/2015 1:01:40 PM PDT by mrs ippi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

Better than leaving them out sitting in the deserty aiting ta to be found
By ISIS membersh


14 posted on 05/24/2015 1:03:20 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

direct link to the White Paper (It’s clear that DOJ wrote it)

http://www.guns.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/CMPInfoPaper11May.pdf


15 posted on 05/24/2015 1:03:49 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
Better than leaving them out sitting in the desert waiting ta to be found By ISIS members
16 posted on 05/24/2015 1:04:33 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

This is concern about the “as is well known” phenomenon of otherwise ordinary sane peaceable people going stark raving mad when they have pistol in their hands or on their belts and just shooting everyone in sight. It happens so often that it isn’t even reported as news and the other “as is well known” syndrome of the living guns that attack on their own.


17 posted on 05/24/2015 1:05:50 PM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldSmaj

It is clear that the DOJ wrote it:

Link to White Paper

http://www.guns.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/CMPInfoPaper11May.pdf


18 posted on 05/24/2015 1:06:06 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun

That is a policy decision and none of the Army’s business.

Most of them were made in WWII. They probably are getting old but then again I once read that the Army in Anniston, Alabama was cutting up brand new in the box, model 52 Winchester sporters which were originally intended to be trainers.


19 posted on 05/24/2015 1:07:06 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun
Once upon a time, in a country long lost to history (the USA), as an NRA Member I bought one of these for $17.50 by mail (along with a M1903A1 Springfield @ $12.50) and, they never went out on a "killing spree" and were traded, decades ago, for other arms..., oh to live in that time again......
20 posted on 05/24/2015 1:10:52 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson