Posted on 05/21/2015 8:19:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Then is is just your opinion.
My opinion, which led me to do a bit of research. The LA times denies that they are the source.
You should reflect on your mistake and learn something from this.
You're welcome.
The LA Times says they are not the source but make no effort to disprove the facts as stated, I guess if they don't like it that is enough.
The LA Times: Oct 16, 2013 ... The Los Angeles Times will no longer publish letters from climate change deniers, Times letters editor Paul Thornton wrote earlier this month.
The LA Times is Hardly a trustworthy news source. Victor Davis Hansen has written eloquently of the destruction of the California he grew up in.
So let me get this straight...your first source is the LA Times, and now you are discrediting the LA Times?
Perhaps you should try you pass shady info on FR.
My source was an eMail I received and so stated at the top of the post in red letter. You posted something from the LA Times saying the letter was a fraud and was not published in the LA Times. I said the LA Times did not attempt to say the stats quoted in the letter was a fraud, only that they thought the email was a fraud. I contend that the facts quoted in the eMail a very likely 100% true, I can't prove it and you can't disprove it either, but personal experience tends to influence my opinions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.