Posted on 05/17/2015 6:52:06 AM PDT by Kaslin
While actions speak louder than words, words often predict future actions. Secular progressives words and actions rarely align. This is because the pseudo-utopian, wholly dystopian perch from which they view the world is so detached from reality that, from a cultural and public policy standpoint, they must disguise their intended actions in flowery and euphemistic language, or face near universal rejection.
When they dont like the terms, liberals redefine the terms to mean something they do not, never have and never can mean. Consider, for instance, the once meaningful words marriage and equality.
Other progressive doublespeak includes words like invest (meaning socialist redistribution of wealth), tolerance (meaning embrace immorality or face total ruin), diversity (meaning Christians and conservatives need not apply), hate (meaning truth) or The Affordable Care Act (meaning unaffordable, unsustainable and utterly inferior socialized medicine).
Even so, its during those rare moments of candor that our cultural Marxist friends rhetoric actually aligns with their intended actions. In other words, every so often, and usually by accident, they tell the truth.
Take this recent declaration by President Obama at Georgetown University. He was discussing his contempt for conservative new media in general and Fox News in particular:
[W]ere going to have to change how our body politic thinks, which means were going to have to change how the media reports on these issues, he said.
How Kim Jong-un of him. In sum: Goal 1) Control thought by, Goal 2) Controlling the media.
This is an idea older than and as well preserved as Vladimir Lenin himself. How Dear Leader intends to reconcile his scheme to change how the media reports on these issues with the First Amendments Free Press Clause, namely, Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom … of the press, is abundantly clear.
He doesnt.
Our emperor-in-chief will force feed his once-free subjects yet another unconstitutional executive decree a Net Neutrality sandwich with a side of Fairness Doctrine.
Or take would-be President Hillary Clintons comments last month on the rite of abortion vs. the right of religious freedom.
The comment has Hillary Clinton essentially saying that Christians must be forced to change their religious views to accommodate abortions.
Far too many women are still denied critical access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth. All the laws weve passed dont count for much if theyre not enforced, Clinton said, using the euphemism for abortion.
Rights have to exist in practice not just on paper, Clinton argued. Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.
Thats a lot of have tos. See the pattern here? Whether its Obama saying government will have to change how the media reports, or Hillary saying deep-seated religious beliefs have to be changed, such despotic demands should spike the neck hair of every freedom-loving American.
And then there are those left-wing extremists whose designs on despotism require that Christians must be made to obey. Homosexual practitioner and New York Times columnist Frank Bruni is one such extremist. In his April 3 column titled, Bigotry: The Bible and the Lessons of Indiana, Bruni quotes homosexual militant Mitchell Gold, a prominent anti-Christian activist: Gold told me that church leaders must be made to take homosexuality off the sin list, he writes. His commandment is worthy and warranted, he adds.
Of course, if homosexual behavior, something denounced as both vile affections and an abomination throughout both the Old and New Testaments, is no longer sexual sin, then there can be no sexual sin whatsoever. To coerce, through the power of the police state, faithful Christians to abandon the millennia-old biblical sexual ethic and embrace the sin of Sodom would likewise require that Christians sign-off on fornication, adultery, incest and bestiality. Such is the unnatural nature of government-mandated moral relativism.
But this isnt free speech, its hate speech! come the mournful cries of the ill-informed and the ill-prepared, desperately afraid to debate the issues on the merits. Hate speech is excluded from protection, opines CNN anchor Chris Cuomo in a recent tweet on the topic. But there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment, replies UCLA law professor Eugene Volohk in a Washington Post op-ed. Hateful ideas (whatever exactly that might mean) are just as protected under the First Amendment as other ideas.
Of course this matters not to those to whom the First Amendment is meaningless.
Indeed, one mans hate speech is another mans truth, and as Ive often said, truth is hate to those who hate truth.
And boy do they hate it.
And so they mean to muzzle it.
The time of which many of us have long warned is no longer on the horizon. The lefts full-on assault against freedom, most especially religious freedom, is at hand. Oddly, or maybe not so oddly, its at once the secular left and orthodox Muslims who lead the charge. These strange bedfellows share a common enemy. He is Truth in the person of Jesus Christ. In order to silence Him, they must silence His faithful followers.
Which brings us to this modern age of American lawlessness. Were fast moving from a soft tyranny to hard tyranny, and progressive leaders like those mentioned above are, chillingly enough, emboldened to the degree that they will openly call for it.
Like our brothers and sisters around the world, American Christians must prepare for suffering.
But, like them, we mustnt despair.
For there are different kinds of suffering.
Suffering through cancer, for instance, can, and often does, lead to death. Without Christ, who is mankinds only hope, such suffering is hopeless indeed.
Yet when a young mother suffers through child birth, and while she may experience the same level of pain as the cancer sufferer, her crying out elicits an entirely different response, and her pain serves an entirely different purpose. While one type of suffering leads to death, the other leads to life. While one attends sorrow, the other attends joy.
Similarly, there is a kind of suffering, suffering in sin, which leads to spiritual death, and a kind suffering, suffering in grace, which leads to spiritual life. Anti-Christian persecution, be it efforts to force Christians into disobedience to God, attempts to silence them outright or, worse, the torture, enslavement and even execution of Christ followers now widespread in both Muslim and Marxist nations across the globe signifies the beginning of birth pains (see Matthew 24:8). And birth pains lead to new life.
which means were going to have to change how the media reports on these issues///
He’s really gone off the deep end. A tyrant who cant’ stand dissent.
If we survive the Kenyan, we have to take the WH or face the fact that our America will need an upheaval.
SS # and documentation???
Not needed for felons, the pRes_ _ent, or criminal illegals.
Not now. not ever.
..... and EXEMPT Boehner and EXEMPT McConnell agree.
The fun will really begin when President Cruz starts mandating his beliefs.
religious beliefs...have to be changed//
They don’t even PRETEND to care about the constitution anymore.
It’s past critical mass. I hope we survive the 19 months till Cruz
Force me to “obey” and I’ll start shooting. That is all.
Obola admitted as much when he said it's a charter of negative liberties.
To whom? Tyrants, of course.
51 million babies...51 million! I never realized how big this was.
As a young adult...conservative with some libertarianism, I hated the fact that the government was attempting to tell woman what they could or could not do with their own bodies...pro-choice if you will, but anti-big brother gubbamint...or at least I thought.
What a cleverly disguised satanic deception! I heard a liberal academic type(can't remember who) say, “it took a generation”. He meant, it took a generation to deceive young people into believing abortion was merely the right to choose. Government intervention.
Forgive us Lord for our national sin. Have mercy and change our hearts. This I plea Jesus, Amen.
A good read. Clearly our persecution draweth nigh.
I particularly like the distinction between suffering that leads to death vs suffering that leads to life.
Very heartening indeed.
Obey THIS, you fascist, Commie-Nazi pigs.
It cannot be stopped.
The prospect of a peaceful restoration of our former Constitutional Republic is a rapidly diminishing image in the rear view mirror.
The lessons of history are quite clear with respect to what is coming - and equally clear as to what we will be obliged to do in response.
YOU WILL CONFORM, PEASANT!
We shall see what the 2016 election brings. And If there is still hope.
Bkmrk.
That’s comparable to the Soviet Communist body count.
How Kim Jong-un of him.
In sum: Goal 1) Control thought by, Goal 2) Controlling the media.
a free mind and a free society are corollaries
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.