Posted on 05/13/2015 7:22:27 AM PDT by Elderberry
I fail to see how any of this will stop it.
Obama ignored a court injunction and gave SS numbers and work permits to 100,000 illegal Mexicans AFTER the injunction went into effect. And admitted it.
So I have to ask, what difference does a court ruling make?
While Congress was unable unwilling to stop President Obama's executive actions on immigration...
Fixed it.
Sounds like Odumbass is striving to destroy the private employment sector in science, technology, computers - information technology and even agriculture with guest worker visas. All planned to destroy the will of the American People. All outlined in saul Alinsky’s book. Yet the country wants Hillary another student of Alinsky who devoted his book to Lucifer!
That certainly is an accurate correction.
There just aren’t enough bullets sometimes...
/johnny
“undo”?
Fine... how can the authorities then find the tens of thousands of people who came here and basically ‘disappeared’ into the country, without any sort of documentation?
“undo”? Really?
Which is not going to happen.
Ditto, here. He is already ignoring the Hobby Lobby decision and ordering all insurance companies to violate the beliefs of their customers.
Then WE'LL need to do it.
unfortunately, you are correct
NOT “unable”.
The correct terminology is UNWILLING to stop..........
100,000 is far less than 5 million or 11 million or more.
Secondly, Judge Hanen is going to come down like a ton of bricks on the DOJ Attorneys that lied to him.
So the short answer is Obama will have no one to carry out his orders because the courts are going to jail them, that’s why.
Obama can get away with a little for a little time, then his game is up. Because he needs pawns, rooks, bishops and knights to carry out his plan. When those pieces are taken, Obama loses.
The game is still in the beginning setup. Soon the Judge will unleash his fury. Stay tuned.
Yes, sir. Blatant Lies to a Federal Judge is not smart at all. They will try to play hide the puck, but I don’t think that will work either. And just following orders is a proven failure as a defence.
Exposure of real crimes is the first step in this battle.
Announce a march on DC or some congressman’s office to show support to all those “living in the shadows”, and good many will come out of the shadows long enough to scream for their “right” to more gibmes on the citizen’s dime. Round them up, deport.
So Obama pardons them all, and puts them right back to work.
Checkmate.
What is missing in the argument is a fundamental legal and constitutional concept that I have yet to see articulated...equal treatment under the law. Proximity to our borders should in no way have an impact on who we allow to legally become citizens.
Our immigration policies are Mexi-centric (or perhaps Lat Am-centric) and it provides members of those ethnic groups to get special treatment under our immigration laws, even when millions of others world-wide are seeking refuge here.
The argument is, of course, skewed by the perceived benefit of favorable voting patterns that Democrats anticipate at the polls, which makes it even more egregious.
What is missing in the argument is a fundamental legal and constitutional concept that I have yet to see articulated...equal treatment under the law. Proximity to our borders should in no way have an impact on who we allow to legally become citizens.
Our immigration policies are Mexi-centric (or perhaps Lat Am-centric) and it provides members of those ethnic groups to get special treatment under our immigration laws, even when millions of others world-wide are seeking refuge here.
The argument is, of course, skewed by the perceived benefit of favorable voting patterns that Democrats anticipate at the polls, which makes it even more egregious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.