Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL Suspends Tom Brady, Punishes Patriots For "Deflategate" [Slap On The Wrist?]
CBS News ^ | May 11, 2015

Posted on 05/11/2015 5:55:09 PM PDT by Steelfish

May 11, 2015 NFL Suspends Tom Brady, Punishes Patriots For "Deflategate"

The NFL announced Monday that it was suspending New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady for his role in a scheme to deflate footballs used in last season's AFC championship game, a controversy that came to be known as "Deflategate."

In a statement released Monday afternoon, the league said the Super Bowl MVP "will be suspended without pay for the first four games of the 2015 regular season for conduct detrimental to the integrity of the NFL."

The league also fined the Patriots $1 million and took away two draft picks, including next years' first-round choice, "for the violation of the playing rules and the failure to cooperate in the subsequent investigation."

In addition, the NFL indefinitely suspended the two Patriots equipment staffers who carried out the plan, including one who called himself "The Deflator."

The punishment was imposed five days after a 243-page report prepared by league-appointed investigator Ted Wells said Brady "was at least generally aware" of plans by the team employees to prepare the balls to his liking, below the league-mandated minimum of 12.5 pounds per square inch.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: nfl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: terycarl

Seems to me Tom Brady should challenge this.
(Unless he is guilty)


61 posted on 05/11/2015 8:51:27 PM PDT by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Brady doesn’t need football, football needs Brady.

With Aaron Rodgers, Andrew Luck and Russell Wilson around for five or more years, the league would be just fine if Brady retired tomorrow.

62 posted on 05/11/2015 8:59:14 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
This means that Rush Limbaugh will spend the entire 3 hours of his show talking about it tomorrow. BORING!
63 posted on 05/11/2015 9:05:05 PM PDT by wintertime (Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Patriots announce Dom Grady will start in place of suspended Tom Brady for the first 4 games of the season.

64 posted on 05/11/2015 9:38:07 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
He knew what was going on, he wouldn't have had that big smirk on his face during that last interview if he didn't. If someone was casting doubt on my integrity at my livelihood I sure wouldn't be smirking. He didn't follow the rules and thereby is a cheater. Doesn't matter if it was a " minor " violation or not.

Personally, last season was enough for me. I don't care if the NFL ever plays another game...

65 posted on 05/11/2015 9:38:59 PM PDT by Smittie (Just like an alien, I'm a stranger in a strange land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued

the world is crazy.

there is this and theres that ...
even the sane people are nuts. we know the women are nutz and the men are like women.

The only thing that works like it supposed to is playoff hockey.

joue a hockey?


66 posted on 05/11/2015 9:46:58 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (-Connecticut Republicanism is a mental disorder. - Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Mujica just did a 1-2-3 8th inning against the BoSox.


67 posted on 05/11/2015 9:54:46 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (-Connecticut Republicanism is a mental disorder. - Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Leaked photo of Tom Brady's Super Bowl Ring

68 posted on 05/11/2015 9:57:29 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Or if it is really a big deal to the NFL, just check the current play ball during the million commercial breaks. And officials just keep the pointed spheroids in their control. It’s a multibillion dollar industry, they could figure it out. The real story here is how the NFL winks at everything that gives an edge to offense as long as it doesn’t upset the sensibilities of the average fan.

Freegards


69 posted on 05/11/2015 10:13:38 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“The Commissioner doing whatever he likes to stomp on the Patriots.”

Nah. The Patriots are untouchable. Brady is untouchable. Quarterbacks on every other team suffer tackles that are unacceptable for Brady. Flags get thrown if Brady feels air move around his special self. He’s worth too much money. I doubt the Commish wanted to to anything at all about this.

The Commish had to do something because the fan uproar after the Saints’ mess (completely unrelated but another recent scandal) and Spygate would have been ridiculous if the Patriots walked again. Purely a financial decision. Make it look like something was done. Calm the fan beast. It’s all about the money. Always is. Just a theory. What it looks like to me.


70 posted on 05/11/2015 10:29:11 PM PDT by bluejean (The lunatics are running the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cherry; All
...the balls they are referring to were used in the first half only of that AFC game....then removed....the Pats didn't start really winning until the supposed "inflated" balls were removed....

Not so. In the 2nd half, the Pats scored once on a short-drive TD set up by an interception; on that drive, Brady threw no passes.

Take away that TD, the Pat offense scored on 3-of-5 drives in the 2nd half; in the first half, the Pat offense scored on 3-of-5 drives (so the same in terms of scoring drives)

Secondly, take away a 30-yard Brady pass to Vereen in the first half (if Vereen wasn't able to hold on to such a softened ball in pelting rain), and the Pats wouldn't have scored that drive.

No score that drive, puts the Pats up 10-7 at half instead of 17-7.

It was only when the Colts were down 17-7 that they essentially abandoned their ground game, which, up until then, was gaining 5 yards a pop.

In a pelting rain, the ground gain is essential.

'Twas the two-score lead that moved the Colts out of the ground game...dangerous to do in such weather.

Would the Colts still have lost? Perhaps. Would the game have been closer minus the softened balls? Probably.

71 posted on 05/11/2015 10:33:01 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mkleesma; All
I like some of the posts on a Boston website - If you suspend one, then you suspend all. Win as a team, lose as a team.

Yeah, I can see it now: Brady wins his appeal, but the two equipment guys, including the one who calls himself "the deflator," don't even get an appeal.

Let's see how far that Patriot "suspend one--in this case, two -- suspend all" goes.

Wouldn't go anywhere. Those guys would be tossed under the bus...and you know it.

So much for rah-rah, sis-boom-bah in Boston!!!!

72 posted on 05/11/2015 10:36:00 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.; All
If the balls were a little under pressure it didn’t make enough difference to worry about.

The article I read tonight indicated the NFL cracked down hard here because evidence existed this had been going on before the Colts' game. (Hey, the Colts even wrote to the NFL about it before their game)

I contend this has been going on since 2007, when Brady's lobbying won teams the right to supply their own footballs.

'Deflategate'

How was it 11 of a dozen Patriot footballs came to be deflated below NFL standards by halftime of the Jan. 18 playoff game with the Colts?

'Ballghazi'

How was it that the Patriots were your average 1.6 to 1.8-fumble-per-game football team 1999-2006 and by 2007 not a single Patriot running back fumbled on a running play...as in NO rushing fumbles all season long...stretching into the post-season for all three playoff games as well? (And then that type of fumble-free patterns stretched not only three extra games, but eight YEARS!)

'Pat-Flattened Pigskins?': Leprechauns on the Loose in New England?

How might a statistical analyst give his “best case” that leprechauns are indeed at large in New England?

Well, what if I told you that the Patriots' DEFENSE fumbled the ball...

...more often in (take your pick which of these following seasons) – 2003, 2002, 2001, 1999 than the Patriots' running backs did rushing the ball in 2007 – even including all three playoff games?

...Or their DEFENSE fumbled the ball as often in 2001 as the Patriots' running backs did rushing the ball for the entire 2007 and 2008 seasons combined (35 games including three playoff games)?!

...Or their DEFENSE fumbled the ball as much combining regular seasons 1999-2003 as did the Patriots running backs' rushing the ball combining regular seasons 2007-2008 and 2010-2011?

(Now you know what the job description of a New England leprechaun is every pre-game!)

Beyond that, just compare the 2006-2007 seasons and broader patterns (either 2000-2014, or 2003-2014)

Charting a Snapshot of 'Ballghazi's' 'Ghost': A

Category 2006 NE Season 2007 NE Season
Overall fumbles 31 (27 regular season) 17 (14 regular season)
Rushing fumbles by Patriot running backs 7 (19 games, including 3 playoffs) 0 (19 games, including 3 playoffs)
Fumble rate per game Avg team: 1.5 vs. NE's 1.6 Avg team: 1.6 vs. NE's 0.8 (Less fumbles by half!) Note: Even indoor based teams averaged 1.55 fumbles per game)
Brady's Completion % 61.8% 68.9%

Charting a Snapshot of 'Ballghazi's' 'Ghost': B

Fumbles by Teams Per Game
2003-2006 NE 2003-2006 Other 31 teams 2007-2014 NE 2007-2014 Other 23 Outdoor teams 2007-2014 Indoor-based teams (8)
1.46 1.6 0.96 [this is improvement of 1 less fumble every 2 games vs. previous NE teams] 1.46 [this means one more fumble every 2 games than NE] 1.29 [this means one more fumble every 3 games than NE]

Source for most raw fumbles-per-games stats: NFL Team Fumbles per Game: Per Year 2014 → 2003
73 posted on 05/11/2015 10:41:36 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.; All
If the balls were a little under pressure it didn’t make enough difference to worry about.

Follow-up to last post:

Comparing Individual Player Statistics when Playing for New England Patriots 2007-->2014 vs Playing for other NFL teams or playing for the Patriots before 2007

Left side: NE PLAYER: 07-14 Right side: NON-NE PLAYER + NE PLAYERS PRE-2007
NAME RECEPTIONS RUSHES TOUCHES 'RELEVANT' FUMBLES* 'RELEVANT' FUMBLES PER TOUCH RECEPTIONS RUSHES TOUCHES 'RELEVANT' FUMBLES 'RELEVANT' FUMBLES PER TOUCH
Wes Welker 741 21 762 6 relevant (other 6 on special teams) 1 per 127 237 1 238 0 relevant (all 13 on special teams) Less than 1 per 238
Laurence Maroney 45 644 689 5 1 per 138 5 67 72 3 1 per 24
BenJarvus Green-Ellis 31 557 588 0 Less than 1 per 588 28 517 545 5 1 per 109
Kevin Faulk 181 252 433 1 relevant (1 special team) 1 per 433 301 700 1001 20 relevant (4 special teams) 1 per 50
Danny Woodhead 104 285 389 3 1 per 130 160 95 255 2 1 per 128
Sammy Morris 52 335 387 3 relevant (1 special team) 1 per 129 117 402 519 8 1 per 65
LaGarrette Blount 6 275 281 3 1 per 94 27 491 518 All 10 relevant 1 per 52
Randy Moss 271 3 274 All 5 relevant 1 per 55 765 23 788 8 relevant by comparison (3 special teams) 1 per 98
Deion Branch 130 0 63 0 Less than 1 per 63 452 11 463 1 relevant (2 special teams by comparison) 1 per 463
Fred Taylor 4 108 112 1 1 per 112 293 2555 2848 All 26 relevant by comparison 1 per 110
Danny Amendola 90 2 92 0 relevant (1 special team) Less than 1 per 92 196 12 208 5 relevant by comparison (5 special teams) 1 per 42
Ben Watson 91 1 92 2 1 per 46 210 1 211 6 1 per 35
Brandon Lloyd 86 0 86 0 Less than 1 per 86 325 1 326 4 1 per 82
Brandon Lafell 83 2 85 1 1 per 85 171 7 178 2 1 per 89
Lamont Jordan 0 80 80 1 1 per 80 163 856 1019 7 relevant (1 special team) 1 per 146
Jabar Gaffney 78 0 78 0 Less than 1 per 78 394 9 403 3 relevant (1 special team) 1 per 134
Heath Evans 8 48 56 0 less than 1 per 56 59 121 180 3 1 per 60
Donte Stallworth 55 1 56 0 Less than 1 per 56 280 20 300 3 relevant (2 special teams) 1 per 100
Brandon Tate 24 6 30 1 1 per 30 31 4 35 0 relevant (11 special teams by comparison) Less than 1 per 35
TOTALS 2080 2620 4700 32 1 in 145 4214 5993 10107 116 1 in 87
8 Players' collective totals who had 274+ touches for Patriots 1431 2372 3803 20 1 per 190 Non-NE or Early NE 1640 2296 56 1 per 70
Note: Relevant' Fumbles Defined: Fumbles committed while rushing the ball or after reception – not special teams' fumbles.

Shenanigan naysaying

Yet despite an NFL-on-the-record fine for a certain Bostonian coach's reputation for shelling out shenanigans ensued by a current NFL-paid attorney investigating the whole football shakedown, many naysayers still doubt these knomes actually exist beyond the legion of urban legends.

So, for certain NFL attorneys who may want to delve into local Boston lore, what pot o' gold nuggets of evidence seems to suggest shenanigans on the loose going back about 8 years?

Note: before assessing chart below, it might be of help to review Warren Sharp's original chart on 19 of these players below:

* Jan. 28, 2015 “update”: New England Patriots Fumble More Often When Playing for Other Teams)
* See also: January 22, 2015: The New England Patriots Prevention of Fumbles is Nearly Impossible and...
* January 23 2015 Slate: Dumb Luck: The New England Patriots’ prevention of fumbles is nearly impossible.

Pat stats: Considerations Weighing Against/For – Sudden Shameful Shamrock Shenanigans in New England

Indicators of 'Deflategate' & 'Ballghazi' as Urban Legend

Red Flags in Pat Stats Suggesting Shenanigans

1. Warren Sharp's analytics case of embellished fumbles (what was he thinking – or not thinking – anyway?) Sharp treated all fumbles as “equal” & “relevant” research. But, alas, they aren't. Simply put, if a team is accused of doctoring their own footballs, & if special teams use a common pool of balls providing no competitive advantage, then special teams' fumbles are irrelevant & need special segmenting from all analytical charts. This impacted Sharp's charts how? One Sharp chart lists 19 players who were either former Patriots or played elsewhere prior to coming to New England. These 19 lost 124 overall fumbles. The problem is three dozen fumbles occurred during returning a punt or kick. (That's 29% of fumbles in list). 1. The “however” to this is it's an “equal-opportunity” application mistake: On the other side of the ledger – those tracking Pat fumbles 2007-2014 – 9 of 39 fumbles were likewise special teams (23% vs. 29% on other side). In other words: Most of fumbles removed from the balance sheet prove to be “a wash.” All it does is to heighten the number of touches on each comparison side per fumble. It is true -- for sake of only including 'relevant' fumbles as it applies to this case study -- that Sharp's "44 touches per fumble" & "73 touches per fumble is a myth. The actual touches are much higher on both comparative sides. Also, when playoff stats are added to Sharp's charts along with one additional measurement – RB Kevin Faulk – it fleshes out an even a greater “measurement”: The lopsided “touches per fumble” ratio Sharp arrived at – 98 – 67 among those 19 players & 107-53 among the five players with 300+ Patriot touches...grows to 145-87 among 20 players & an astounding 190-70 split among 8 players with 274+ touches (Wes Welker, Laurence Maroney, BenJarvus Green-Ellis, Faulk, Danny Woodhead, Sammy Morris, LeGarrette Blount, & Randy Moss)
1a. How did (1) above play out? Wes Welker, for example, returned punts/kickoffs for both Pats & other teams: Therefore, half of his Pat fumbles were irrelevant to case study & ALL of his non-Patriot fumbles were likewise irrelevant. Same with Brandon Tate re: his non-Patriot fumbles (all irrelevant). One would think that including Tate's 11 fumbles in only 35 touches would greatly skew the results to work against Sharp's hypothesis. A dozen other fumbles were likewise removed on the non Pats' side: (Amendola, 5; Moss, 3; Stallworth, 2; + Jordan & Gaffney, 1 apiece). 1a. How the above played out on Pat stat side '07-14: Welker returned punts & kicks for the Pats, too: So half of his fumbles were special teams' related. Amendola & Morris also had each had a special teams' fumbles removed. And tho Sharp didn't include Kevin Faulk in his chart because Faulk only played for the Pats, Faulk is perhaps THE most interesting case study, but not for special teams' sake (Faulk had one special teams' fumble removed from his stat total; beyond that, he only fumbled once in his last five seasons with the Pats - & it was a reception, not a rush. By comparison, in the alleged pre-Ballghazi era, Faulk fumbled it 24 times (4 special teams) over eight seasons: 13 rushing, 7 after catches. IoW, he averaged 1 'relevant' fumble every 35 touches thru 2006; suddenly it mushroomed to 1 'relevant' fumble every 433 touches 2007-2011. IoW, Kevin Faulk himself is the face -- the poster boy -- for 'ballghazi shenanigans'!
2. 'Relevant' fumbles & fumble ratios: When the raw fumbles #s are scrubbed & only 'relevant ones remain, 8 of 19 players Sharp analyzed don't match the “we fumbled more wearing non-Patriot shirts” narrative: Danny Woodhead, Fred Taylor, Brandon Lloyd, Brandon Lafell, Deion Branch & Lamont Jordan all have similar fumble ratio numbers no matter which team they've played for; + Wes Welker, Randy Moss – when properly stripped of those special teams' fumbles – even showed significantly more of a penchant to fumble when playing for the Patriots. 2. Collective stats for 11 Patriots 2007-2014 show only 1 fumble every 472 touches! While some of the Patriot fumble “miserliness” 07-14 are indeed attributable to guys who tend not to fumble often (beyond special teams at least) – Welker, Woodhead, & Laurence Maroney. Yet when the other 15 Rbs & Wide-outs are surveyed, 'twas an “almost impossible” scenario to look @ the stats of 11 of them & realize these 11 combined for almost 1900 touches between them during those 8 seasons, & yet they fumbled only four times: 1889 touches & only four collective fumbles by Green-Ellis, Faulk, Branch, Taylor, Amendola, Lloyd, Lafell, Jordan, Gaffney, Evans, Stallworth – that's only one fumble per 472 touches
3. A fumble-by-fumble review turns up that the players most responsible for Pat fumbles were quarterbacks! “NFL Fumble Pie” is cut up into 5 pieces: Fumbles by Qbs, Rbs, Receivers, Special teams, & the occasional post-interception fumble. For 1999-2006, Pats Qbs made 45% of fumbles; that was reduced to 33% 2007-2014. Sharp (& others including myself) don't want to include Qbs for analysis purposes because they already tend to have an untucked ball in most play situations. The key point here, though, is between 07-14, Pats Qbs + special teams accounted for over half of all team fumbles, leaving less room to “shenanigize” anything 3. The so-called “flip side” of this argument is actually the same argument: Yes, review the fumbles to see who was actually making them, or rather, no longer coming even close to making them. How is it that the Patriot Rbs averaged less than 3 fumbles per season 2007-2014? How is it than when you include playoff games, the Pats average a rushing fumble by a RB or wide-out about once every six games? How did the Pats go through '07 –19 games including playoffs – without its Rbs managing to fumble the ball on a rushing play? (Kevin Faulk had one fumble – but even that came on pass he caught)
4. If you're trying to explain why Brady had his sudden 2007 completion % surge, look no further than Randy Moss. Moss had previously had two 100+ reception years; his new presence in '07 accounted for 98 receptions. 4. Indeed, personnel are very important considerations. And it's personnel breakdown charts like the one below – a corrective revision of Warren Sharp's – listing 19 players that makes the 'Ballghazi' case. (Note: added Kevin Faulk as a 20th player because Faulk had over 430 touches post 2006 & that can be readily compared to his 1999-2006 Patriot seasons where he had 700 touches) – that also provides a “face” to this “ghost” of “Ballghazi.”

Chart Summary: Distinctions between Warren Sharp stats and those below (See Jan. 28, 2015 “update”: New England Patriots Fumble More Often When Playing for Other Teams)

Fumbles-per-touch analytics
STATISTICAL BOUNDARIES COLOFORNIAN'S ANALYTICAL BOUNDARIES WARREN SHARP'S ANALYTICAL BOUNDARIES
Are only 'relevant' fumbles -- non-special teams' fumbles -- included in fumbles per touch comparisons? YES NO (Sharp's are accumulative)
Are playoff stats included in 'relevant' fumbles by touch comparisons? YES NO (Sharp uses only season stats despite very controversy arising in playoff context)
Are pre-2007 Patriots stats included in 'relevant fumbles by touch comparisons? YES NO (Sharp didn't include Kevin Faulk as he only played for NE; & he didn't use Deion Branch, Ben Watson & Laurence Maroney pre-2007 Pat stats: Yet these stats are relevant for comparison sake)

74 posted on 05/11/2015 10:43:10 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
NFL better tread carefully on this when the appeal comes through. Brady doesn’t need football, football needs Brady.

The Patriots have a history of cheating going back to Spygate in 2007. As far as Brady is concerned he needs football, it's who he is, and right now his image is tarnished. He quits and the big bucks go away, no network is going to hire him as a football analyst (if inclined to do so) and pay him the kind of money he's making with the Patriots.

75 posted on 05/11/2015 11:28:23 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Kraft’s reaction is pathetic.....he’s got a guy on his payroll calling himself “The Deflator”....enough said. Take your medicine and show some humility.


76 posted on 05/11/2015 11:46:07 PM PDT by GotMojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Very good post cherry

Nicely done

For many Freepers this is about Brady’s great time and their sorry one

Hey I lived in Bud Adams ghosts head so I can say that

Go Saints!


77 posted on 05/12/2015 12:09:31 AM PDT by wardaddy (Dems hate western civilization and GOP are cowards...We are headed to a dark place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
He knew.

And he lied about knowing as well.

78 posted on 05/12/2015 1:12:54 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
The NFL doesn't have to prove guilt like in a criminal court, but guilt as in a civil court.

Every QB knows exactly what the weight of the football is he is using.

79 posted on 05/12/2015 1:15:16 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.
Cheating is cheating and it must be dealt with.

Amazing how many 'conservatives' don't understand that.

80 posted on 05/12/2015 1:16:31 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson