Skip to comments.
Official Identifies One Suspect in Attack at Texas Anti-Islam Event
The New York Times ^
| MAY 4, 2015
| By MANNY FERNANDEZ and RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
Posted on 05/04/2015 9:57:31 AM PDT by Salman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Reagan0704
21
posted on
05/04/2015 10:09:33 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: servantboy777
So would Christianity across the globe be considered Anti-Islam by the NYTimes? Unequivocally yes. The very existence of Christians is Anti-Islam as far as Muslims, the NY Times and our own President are concerned.
22
posted on
05/04/2015 10:09:53 AM PDT
by
JustaCowgirl
(the left has redefined the word 'racism' to mean any disagreement with any liberal about any topic)
To: Salman
Let's go ahead and snip one more from the article. In spite of itself, ...
Ms. Geller described Sundays event as pro-free speech, and said that Muslims had become a special class that Americans were no longer allowed to offend.
The media is self-enforcing a Shariah, she said, referring to Islamic law. Under the Shariah you cannot criticize or offend Islam.
23
posted on
05/04/2015 10:10:16 AM PDT
by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: Dqban22
I wonder how the gay jihadists including Obie Huessein Mohammed Obama will handle this one??
24
posted on
05/04/2015 10:11:31 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Salman
Nope, nothing to see here. I didn’t click on the link, did NYT actually say ‘anti-islam event’?
Makes you wonder how many TRUE sleeper cells are here inside and learning from these wannabe amateurs.
25
posted on
05/04/2015 10:13:16 AM PDT
by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: re_nortex
26
posted on
05/04/2015 10:14:14 AM PDT
by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: Salman
27
posted on
05/04/2015 10:15:41 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: MeshugeMikey
Your artwork *ALWAYS* makes me laugh!
Good work!
28
posted on
05/04/2015 10:15:44 AM PDT
by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
To: don-o
And that's why I am 100% anti-islam and have no beef at all with the NYT's headline. I am also anti-abortion, anti-communism and anti-sodomy. You're either pro-islam or anti-islam and taking an unambiguous, no-nonsense stand against evil is righteous. Don't be lukewarm, being unabashedly anti-islam is being pro-American!
29
posted on
05/04/2015 10:17:15 AM PDT
by
re_nortex
(DP - that's what I like about Texas)
To: Salman
So the NYT thinks that cartoons are “anti-islam.” And not freedom of speech. You’d think journalists would get it, but it’s been a long time since the NYT was anything but a public relations outlet.
30
posted on
05/04/2015 10:17:27 AM PDT
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: JustaCowgirl
Shew...Thank you, thought I was goin nuts for a moment.
To: Menehune56
Prison Convert? Illegal alien? Legal alien?
32
posted on
05/04/2015 10:21:15 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: winner3000
If Christians assaulted a group of atheists who were holding a We Hate Jesus gathering, the Slimes would be quick in condemning the Christians and calling for crackdowns on other Christian groups. They’d be hollering about freedom of speech and the right to offend. Hypocrites.
To: Veto!
I, of course, hate the NYT. But it confounds me that some FReepers objecting to the term "anti-islam" in the headline.
If you're anti-tyranny, anti-abortion, anti-gungrabbers and anti-sodomy, you're by definition also anti-islam. There is no middle ground, you're either pro-islam or anti-islam. It's clear that the world would be a far better place with every trace of islam totally eradicated.
34
posted on
05/04/2015 10:23:56 AM PDT
by
re_nortex
(DP - that's what I like about Texas)
To: don-o
Voltaire: “To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”
islam = satan’s death cult
allah = satan
Pedophile moohammud = satan’s follower
35
posted on
05/04/2015 10:27:21 AM PDT
by
newfreep
("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
To: Westbrook
Mission Accomplshed!
I love doing this stuff!
Thank you!
36
posted on
05/04/2015 10:31:47 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: RoosterRedux
The comments at the NYSlimes come down solidly against Pamela Geller and supportive of those poor taunted (but luckily for us, dead) jihadis. 2 Thess Chapter 2
7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
37
posted on
05/04/2015 10:32:41 AM PDT
by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: driftless2
Exactly!.... and well said!
To: Salman
What? The second guy (and likely wife of the first - they were mates afterall) is the 12th Imam or something?
39
posted on
05/04/2015 10:34:07 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: cripplecreek
“Wonder whats taking so long to identify the second shooter?”
They had to strain the remains for the fingerprints...
40
posted on
05/04/2015 10:37:17 AM PDT
by
BigCinBigD
(...Was that okay?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson