Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vietnam Buys Deadly New Missiles Capable of Hitting China
The Diplomat ^ | 30 April 2015 | Franz-Stefan Gady

Posted on 04/30/2015 1:47:27 PM PDT by Army Air Corps

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Pearls Before Swine

The Russians and the Chinese have had tensions along their shared border. This may be part of a series of signals from Moscow to Beijing.


21 posted on 04/30/2015 2:06:12 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
“Why would Viet Nam attack China?

Over disputed territory!

Yes you're quite right!

Vietcongs are men of long bloody war against ultra-modern America, Chicoms better not mess with Vietcongs, LOL!

22 posted on 04/30/2015 2:08:26 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Klub.. Sizzler??

Who names these things? Geesh.

Zinger. Kaabamster.

The multinational arms trade has some ways to go as they work the PR angle.


23 posted on 04/30/2015 2:09:21 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

The PRC and the SRVN did “have it out” during The Sino-Vietnamese War in 1979.


24 posted on 04/30/2015 2:10:26 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

NATO reporting names.


25 posted on 04/30/2015 2:10:56 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Vietnam Buys Deadly New Missiles Capable of Hitting China

Since Vietnam and China border each other, wouldn't a missile capable of hitting China require a range of say about ten feet?

(yes, I know they are naval missile. I just thought the range statement was funny)

26 posted on 04/30/2015 2:11:21 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Touché! :-)


27 posted on 04/30/2015 2:12:41 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

And, speaking of Vietnam reminded me that today is April 30, 2015 and is the 40th anniversary of the surrender of South Vietnam to Communist North Vietnam on April 30, 1975.

http://www.prageruniversity.com/History/The-Truth-about-the-Vietnam-War.html


28 posted on 04/30/2015 2:13:44 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Thanks to Hillary! peace is breaking out all over.


29 posted on 04/30/2015 2:15:06 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Vietnam was attacked (and possibly conquered, I can’t remember) by the Chinese centuries ago and have hated them ever since.


30 posted on 04/30/2015 2:15:21 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

In the late 70s China invaded Vietnam just to kick their rear end. Vietnam would love to get revenge.


31 posted on 04/30/2015 2:16:34 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
NATO reporting names.

Yep. Same source of missiles like Grail or Scud.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_reporting_name#Missiles

Missiles

The initial letter of the name indicated the use of that equipment.

A — air-to-air missiles, example AA-2 Atoll: List of NATO reporting names for air-to-air missiles
K — air-to-surface missiles (from the Russian Kh designation), example AS-17 Krypton: List of NATO reporting names for air-to-surface missiles
G — surface-to-air missiles, SAM (or Ground-to-air), including ship- and submarine-launched, example SA-2 Guideline: List of NATO reporting names for surface-to-air missiles
S — surface-to-surface missiles, including ship- and submarine-launched. (most famously the SS-1 Scud): List of NATO reporting names for surface-to-surface missiles

32 posted on 04/30/2015 2:16:44 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

China lost about 50,000 men in that war.


33 posted on 04/30/2015 2:20:01 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Maybe because China attacked Vietnam back in 1979. Nobody expected that either.
34 posted on 04/30/2015 2:20:38 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

There were multiple invasions by China. The Vietnamese really aren’t keen on the Han.


35 posted on 04/30/2015 2:22:18 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Why would Viet Nam attack China?

They are old antagonists. Their most recent conflict over some border territory (1979) is also referred to as the Third Sino-Vietnamese War.

36 posted on 04/30/2015 2:24:57 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Like Dear Reader says, never has there been a more peaceful time. *spit*


37 posted on 04/30/2015 2:29:53 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

“Deadly missile?” Versus the non-lethal type of missile?


38 posted on 04/30/2015 2:38:53 PM PDT by subterfuge (Minneseeota: the laughingstock of the nation - for lots of reasons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
The Sino-Soviet split illustrates that lie.

Sino-Soviet split?

The two countries have been holding joint war games since about 2005.

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
______________________________________________________________

"Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants."

http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2005/09/war-games-russia-china-grow-alliance

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170287,00.html

39 posted on 04/30/2015 2:39:22 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Since VietNam and China share a border, I could throw a (smaller) missile across the river and hit China. This is not a major technological achievement.


40 posted on 04/30/2015 2:43:31 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson