Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!
Make a difference.
PLEASE Contribute Today!
Posted on 04/26/2015 12:47:36 PM PDT by Resettozero
The former public face of Bill Clinton’s White House—and current host of ABC News’ This Week—George Stephanopoulos was floored as two prominent journalists and the Republican Speaker of the House from his Clinton days, Newt Gingrich, laid out for him just how bad the “Clinton Cash” book is for his old bosses.
During the show’s roundtable panel after Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer appeared on the show for a lengthy interview, Stephanopoulos teamed with Democratic strategist Donna Brazile in an attempt to discredit Schweizer. But it started with Stephanopoulos making a shocking admission: Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign wouldn’t send out any official surrogates or spokespeople to defend her on this scandal.
“Donna, I got to talk to you first—I know you’re close to the Clinton team—they did not want to put anybody out to talk about this book today even though we asked, and you just saw Peter Schweizer there,” Stephanopoulos said to Brazile. “What do you make of his allegations generally but also his specific allegation that he makes that there are undisclosed donations to the Clinton Foundation from foreign charities?”
Brazile admitted she doesn’t know what’s in the book. Yet, without having read it, she proceeded to drop a series of rhetorical attacks on Schweizer. She also offered the Clinton campaign advice on how to attempt to get past Clinton Cash.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Wow! I recently installed AdBlock to my IE and can actually read a Breitbart article without the ads locking up my browser.
The only reason why the moon tastes good is because it's made of cheese.
Adblock has made Breitbart accessible for me.
I tried AdBlock and today was the first time I’ve been able to go on Breitbart and actually read the article.
“The Clintons “violated the spirit of Barack Obama’s presidency”?
How could anyone say that with a straight face?
AdBlockPro browser extension.
Important point not to miss: the Clintons are running from the Constitution.
This tells us our Constitution is alive and thriving, and could well save our country from the H bomb.
CORRECTION OF EARLIER POST:
ADBLOCK PLUS - ABP
(Apology.)
Ghostery may be helping me.
Valerie Jarrett is engineering her ‘collapse’. Hillary isn’t liberal enough. Scary, huh?
But Elizabeth Warren IS liberal enough for VJ. That is why The Reptile met with Warren a few weeks before Clinton announced. It is also why the New York Times keeps getting these Clinton scoops. The Reptile is leaking them to the NYT. It is also why the NYT is publishing them. They would NEVER publish anything against a Democrat unless under direct order from the White House.
I’m surprised at Stephanopoulus. I would have expected that he would remain loyal to the Clintons. But, I guess I should not be TOO surprised. There is no loyalty among thieves.
The Soros octopus was in the Clinton push to the heights they have gained much earlier than anyone much imagines. Bill Clinton was sort of a “post turtle” back in the days when he was just coming to prominence in national politics, nobody knew how he got there and at first, Clinton was pretty much just flailing. But Bill and Herself were adept at catching the tide and the wind, riding it up not so much on any virtues they may have possessed, but because others were left struggling in the shallows.
When Herself left Washington back in 1974, it was under a cloud, for the way in which Herself was taking shortcuts and turning in sloppy work on the impending impeachment papers being drawn up by the Zeifman committee, of which Herself had a part. For despising Nixon so much, Herself has certainly emulated the acts and performance of Nixon, who after all, only lost some 18 and a half minutes on an audio tape, while Herself has concealed any access to some 30,000 e-mails kept on a personal server, contrary to all government policy.
I run Ghostery but others think it inhibits their banking and other such sites. It doesn’t.
I do my banking at the bank.
Stephanopoulos is NOT defending Hillary Clinton. The fact this topic is even ON THE SHOW is intended to harm Hillary. If he was truly defending Clinton, the topic would not have been discussed.
Stephanopoulos switched sides.
Agree with your assessment.
R2z
Ah, the good old days, when the left was merely “unseemly” in public.
Went there and read it to the end. Great, informative article and the site didn’t give my laptop any trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.