Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Promising results, DOE publishes more findings from North Slope methane hydrate test well
Petroleum News ^ | Week of April 26, 2015 | Alan Bailey

Posted on 04/25/2015 8:17:05 AM PDT by thackney

The National Energy Technology Laboratory has published some new results from methane hydrate testing carried out in 2011 and 2012 in the Ignik Sikumi test well on Alaska’s North Slope. According to an article in the latest edition of NETL’s Fire in Ice publication, the results shed light on the potential use of injected carbon dioxide as a means of producing natural gas from methane hydrate deposits, while also demonstrating that producing gas by depressuring the deposits may work more easily than previously thought.

Methane hydrate is a naturally occurring solid that traps concentrated volumes of methane, the primary component of natural gas, in an ice-like lattice of water molecules. The material, which is only stable within a certain range of temperatures and pressures, is known to exist in huge quantities around the base of the permafrost under the North Slope. A viable means of commercially producing natural gas from the material could add massive volumes of recoverable natural gas to the more conventional gas resources available on the Slope.

Multi-year research

Research into both the extent of the methane hydrate deposits in Arctic North America and elsewhere around the world, and into the technical and commercial feasibility of producing gas from the hydrates, has been in progress for a number of years. In 2002 a test in a methane hydrate test well in northwestern Canada attempted methane production through the application of hot water to the hydrate reservoir but found this technique to be ineffective. However, another test demonstrated that the hydrates could be disassociated through depressurization without the artificial application of heat.

In 2007 BP, the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Geological Survey drilled the Mount Elbert methane hydrate stratigraphic test well at Milne Point on the Alaska North Slope. Tests in this well demonstrated the possibility of depressuring the hydrates and thus releasing methane by extracting free water from the hydrate reservoir.

And in 2008 a new test in the Canadian well succeeded in producing about 13,000 cubic meters of gas over a six-day period using depressurization.

In April 2011 ConocoPhillips drilled the Ignik Sikumi methane hydrate test well to a depth of 2,597 feet in the Prudhoe Bay unit on the North Slope. The well passed through the permafrost layer and extended below the base of methane hydrate deposits known to exist at the well site. A team involving ConocoPhillips, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corp. then conducted tests using the well.

Carbon dioxide injection

A primary purpose of the Ignik Sikumi test was to try injecting carbon dioxide into the methane hydrate, in hopes that the carbon dioxide would displace methane from the hydrate lattice, thus serving the dual purpose of both producing natural gas and sequestering carbon dioxide coming from the Prudhoe Bay oil field. The test also involved depressurization of the hydrates, along the lines of what had been tried in the Canadian well a few years earlier. Laboratory experiments had demonstrated the use of carbon dioxide to displace methane in hydrates, but nobody knew whether this type of technique would work in the field. Successful use of the technique could enable the exploitation of hydrate deposits without any impact on the mechanical stability of the deposits, and without the formation of pore-clogging ice or secondary hydrates as a consequence of disassociation-induced cooling.

According to the report that NETL has now published, the Ignik Sikumi tests actually involved injecting a mixture of nitrogen and carbon dioxide into the hydrates, along with chemical tracers to track where the injected material ended up. A flowback of material from the well at pressures above the stability pressure for pure methane hydrate was then conducted for one-and-half days to evaluate the effect of the injected mixture. This test was followed by a 30-day flowback in which a pump reduced the downhole pressure to levels below the hydrate stability threshold, thus inducing gas production through hydrate disassociation.

The tests demonstrated that, while pure carbon dioxide tends to react with free water in a methane hydrate reservoir to form carbon dioxide hydrate, rather than displacing methane from the existing hydrate, the injection of a carefully designed gas mixture, such as the mixture of nitrogen and carbon dioxide used in the Ignik Sikumi well, can be effective in methane production, the new report says.

Responsive to pressure

The depressurization test, the longest conducted to date as a part of methane hydrate research, showed methane production that was highly responsive to the well’s bottomhole pressure. And, importantly, the heat exchange as a consequence of cooling of the hydrates during disassociation proved more favorable than anticipated, thus pointing to the possibility of using more aggressive pressure reduction techniques, the new report says. While more laboratory studies and field tests will be needed to better understand the gas exchange process that was tested in the Ignik Sikumi well, the next field tests should involve the use of both an injection well and a production well the NETL report says. Commercial viability would depend on factors such as the well configuration, the injection method and the gas mixture injected. It is clear that gas injection and exchange will remain valuable in association with methane hydrate development strategies that are based primarily on reservoir depressurization, the report says.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: energy; gashydrate; hydrates; methanehydrates; northslope

1 posted on 04/25/2015 8:17:05 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney
You're the man, thack .... what does it all mean to us ?

Better living through plastics .. chemicals ... medicines ?

My flying car ?

a larger penis .... or just one that works ?

2 posted on 04/25/2015 8:20:35 AM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Massive amounts of Methane (Natural Gas). Enough to make shale gas reserves look almost small by comparison.

Cost is the issue. Can it be produced at a cost comparable to shale gas and traditional sources?


3 posted on 04/25/2015 8:30:16 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knarf

At least it looks OK in the shower...


4 posted on 04/25/2015 8:30:27 AM PDT by null and void (He who kills a tyrant (i.e. an usurper) to free his country is praised and rewarded ~ Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


5 posted on 04/25/2015 8:32:48 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Science!


6 posted on 04/25/2015 8:35:55 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Life is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
At least it looks OK in the shower...
says null and void


Why is that so funny to me ?

(damned good thing FR doesn't have any of those smiley face icons)


/8^)

7 posted on 04/25/2015 8:36:26 AM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

More than enough to power everything. Doesn’t seem like we are running out of “fossil fuels”. Too bad peak oilers. Good post Thack.


8 posted on 04/25/2015 9:00:52 AM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

.


9 posted on 04/25/2015 9:53:28 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Encouraging.

Could this be combined with directional drilling and fracking to really boost production, or is this too deep?

Any development on ocean bottom extraction?


10 posted on 04/25/2015 12:31:50 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Direction drill would likely be used. Hydraulic Fracturing is not applicable. This is not tight rock that needs cracks to allow flow.

There has been bottom sediment extraction by Japan in recent years, still in the experimentation phase.


11 posted on 04/25/2015 2:01:40 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Why am I stunned that the DOE is (seemingly) helping develop a fossil fuel resource?


12 posted on 04/25/2015 2:10:00 PM PDT by pluvmantelo (My hope for America died 11-06-12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Methane Hydrate is also found in deep ocean areas too. If a process can be found to recover the methane from methane hydrate we can be power our electric generation plants and heat home for generations. Russians have claimed large areas of the Arctic for just that reason.


13 posted on 04/25/2015 8:53:17 PM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson