Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Your View: How could anyone vote for Hillary?
The New Bedford Standard-Times ^ | April 18, 2015 | Steve DiMarzo, Jr.

Posted on 04/18/2015 7:24:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Early in the political season now, we have four who have declared their intentions to run for the presidency of the United States: Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton. One would think after having experienced some of the worst economic woes ever heaped upon the American public by the most un-American Democratic administration in our history that anyone would even consider Hillary Clinton as a viable candidate is beyond logical reasoning.

Hillary's political "baggage" seems to grow each and every year that she is around in some kind of official position in our government, as witnessed by her stint as secretary of state, where she oversaw the deaths of four of our brave Americans in Benghazi.

Her official stance was that it was a "video" that incited to riot those Libyans to kill our ambassador and three others defending him. However, the truth is that she and the others at the State Department and President Obama knew within minutes that this was a terrorist attack, yet denied that fact even today.

How can anyone, even those of you of the left, even consider this woman even remotely qualified to run this country with her record of deceit and deception about this act and others?

Even in potential swing states, no one seems to be able to trust her judgment or even her honesty to tell the truth especially when it comes to her deleting all of her emails on her private server, which were State Department official documents required to be saved and preserved. Yet, most of you on the left want to give her a pass just because she is a liberal.

Only twice in the last century has a third term been given to a ruling president in power. Don't expect that trend to extend to Hillary being elected in 2016, and that is because she is toxic in all things pertaining to transparency, honesty, trustworthiness and openness.

Even though we have on the right three tea party favorites right now to potentially vote for, any one of them would make a much better president that Hillary in so many ways. Ted Cruz has said that the federal government has specific duties and everything else should be left up to the states to decide: this includes, same-sex marriage, abortion, education standards, school choice, voter ID, health care and anything else not covered in the constitutional responsibilities of the federal government.

Now, for the federal government to be the official arbiter of all of these things is an abuse of power. These delicate items should be resolved at the state level, which should give all of us insight into who will actually be the best president for this country in 2016.

The left will continue to "defraud" our electoral system by granting "illegal's" the right to vote through the granting of licenses in both California and New York, both liberal states hell-bent on "stealing" elections with non-citizen votes. This is the only way for Democrats to win in 2016, through voter fraud and through Hillary Clinton being portrayed as the savior of America. We cannot afford another liberal president.

Steve DiMarzo Jr. lives in Rochester.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; hillary; obama; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2015 7:24:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

2 posted on 04/18/2015 7:27:00 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

ahahaha THANK YOU!


3 posted on 04/18/2015 7:28:17 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

HillaryPhones. HillaryBucks. New name same stripe.


4 posted on 04/18/2015 7:28:44 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Um, I guess because she has a vagina, or a variance of the same.

Ewww.....

5 posted on 04/18/2015 7:29:34 PM PDT by PROCON (CRUZing into 2016 with TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

6 posted on 04/18/2015 7:29:58 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s the right of every American citizen with a clean criminal record to vote. Even the stupid, and that’s where Hillary comes in.


7 posted on 04/18/2015 7:30:31 PM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

HOW?

The same way they voted for Ohole twice.


8 posted on 04/18/2015 7:31:21 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

9 posted on 04/18/2015 7:31:52 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

It’s all about retaining power, and her ticket is that she’s a woman, has nothing to do with competence. This is why Fiorina needs to run, to take that edge from Hillary.


10 posted on 04/18/2015 7:32:01 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

ahahahaha


11 posted on 04/18/2015 7:32:05 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Classic!!!


12 posted on 04/18/2015 7:32:24 PM PDT by Fungi (So you think you know anything about evolution? Think again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

LOL!


13 posted on 04/18/2015 7:32:26 PM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If I had a trust fund or an EBT card I could vote for her.If I was a boy who wanted to mutilate my body so I could masquerade as a girl I could vote for her.If I was a Maoist I could vote for her.If I had no conscience I could vote for her.

Otherwise...no way,Jose.

14 posted on 04/18/2015 7:34:16 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama;A Low Grade Intellect With Even Lower Morals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
HillaryPhones. HillaryBucks. New name same stripe.

If it comes from hillary's "stash," I'd suspect it's poxed.
15 posted on 04/18/2015 7:36:03 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

16 posted on 04/18/2015 7:37:06 PM PDT by kingattax (a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have a couple acquaintances how are Ready for Hillary. I am on them all the time about Hillary and why they support her. Look they are liberals and all that, and I tell them Hillary is more indebted to Wall Street banks than any Republican. And she is more into big business than any Koch brother.

I tell them, "You are a liberal, not my deal, but fine. But it makes no sense to vote for Hillary based on your political leanings. I tell them, I understand if they would support Warren, she is a true believer liberal. But Hillary is as corporate as they come.

It hasn't worked yet, but mostly I am trying to dispirit them.

17 posted on 04/18/2015 7:38:08 PM PDT by Pappy Smear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why is the Left so obsessed with genitalia?


18 posted on 04/18/2015 7:40:05 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men." Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
a little subtle
19 posted on 04/18/2015 7:40:06 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The woman has no positive accomplishments. She has failed at about everything she has tried. She a a list of events that virtually scream corruption (Whitewater, Rose Law Firm, Cattle Futures, FBI Files, Clinton Foundation, etc.), She is shrill, inarticulate, clumsy, phony. She is a liar. She holds a failed political philosophy, She drinks, and has stumbled, staggered, or passed out on numerous occasions, She is ill-tempered, with a well documented disdain for underlings who work for her. There is evidence that she is a bigot, at least where Jews are concerned. She is quick to falsely blame political opponents for crimes that her allies had committed ('the vast right wing conspiracy'). She never addresses questions from her critics. AND she does not follow laws designed to provide transparency and accountability for her office.

If there is a single reason to vote FOR her, I'd like to hear it.

20 posted on 04/18/2015 7:40:07 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson