The radar evidence is irrefutable.
There are ‘targets’ diverting from the aircraft vector at Mach speeds...only possible from high-order detonation, be it missile warhead or otherwise, not a GD low-order fuel-vapor explosion.
Combined with the witness statements, the question comes to mind,
“Why lie?”
Discussing/debating possible theories/answers to clearly fabricated reports are not ‘conspiracy-theory’, but the very foundation of this country, in particular seeking the actual truth of the matter DESPITE the coverup...
But we’ll never know if this was covered up to keep a ‘terrorist attack’ off Billy’s rap sheet...’cause Billy’s got a shot to get back into the WH as 2nd-fiddle.
But the very idea that dozens, if not hundreds, of government employees between multiple departments, covered up the actual cause of that ‘disaster’ concerns me greatly. That and the fact that not a single one of them has come forward to corroborate the charges of others (they must value their federal pensions more than the Constitution; for that they should be all imprisoned, imho).
At the time I had a very serious discussion with my two brothers. One a 25 year pilot who few 747’s and the other an engineer who helped build the 747’s and then the 777’s. Both of them laughed at me when I said you cannot deny the 700 witness’. I even exclaimed, “the victims families want to sue Boeing for the fuel tank explosion, has any fuel tank explosion happened on any other plane in history?”
bttt
Wouldn't it be considered a product safety defect, and wouldn't the government react, as it does in the military when an aircraft exhibits some questionable defect, result in the GROUNDING OF THE AIR FLEET?
The fact that the government did NOT ground that type of airframe until inspections were made, worldwide, indicates the government itself DOES NOT BELIEVE it was a fuel tank explosion.
There was a wedding party of dozens of people who say a missile streak upwards. I am a news junkie; it was shown on TV...but within hours, the news networks pulled that from the TV.
And why wasn't the NTSB in charge? Why the FBI? That's another "indicator" that something wasn't as they said.
We were hit on that day. Did anyone claim credit (blame) for it? I'd like to know. It would be too easy to rent a small boat, sit just offshore and fire a U.S.-made Stinger missile, one of the countless that we gave the Afghans during their war against Soviet occupation.
I think that's what happened; it was one of our Stingers, and the outcry, if the American people ever found that out, would be terrible.
wHAT ANTI AIRCRAFT MISSILE has the range to fly that far?
Clinton’s getting it all out early.