Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Super Concerned Rand Paul Will "Let Women Die" [or something]
Townhall.com ^ | 4/15/2015 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 04/15/2015 5:45:03 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross

DNC Chairwoman and late term abortion advocate Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who threatened to call President Obama a sexist if he fired her after the 2014 midterm elections, is concerned GOP presidential candidate and Senator Rand Paul wants to "let women die."

"We believe a decision on a woman’s reproductive choices is best left between a woman and her doctor and I am still waiting for Rand Paul to say whether or not he supporting exceptions when a woman is raped, going to force a woman to carry a baby to term and not allow her to make that choice? When she’s the victim of rape, the victim of incest? Are we going to let a woman die? Would Rand Paul let a woman die because she’s carrying a baby or is he going to let her make that choice with her doctor?" she said during an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer last night.

When asked about aborting a 7-month old baby, Wasserman Schultz is heard laughing before doubling down on the Democrat Party stance of being "pro-choice." You can watch by clicking on the image below.

video at link ...

During an interview with The Kelly File, Wasserman Schultz tripled down on providing zero restrictions for abortion, even in the third trimester.

Despite what Wasserman Schultz and the DNC will claim, that their abortion stance is in line with the women of America, it isn't. According to 2014 polling from Marist, the vast majority of Americans, including those who identify as pro-choice and women, oppose late term abortion and believe it should be banned after three months of pregnancy.

A new survey of Americans finds strong support for abortion restrictions – including among those who identify as “strongly pro-choice.” Eighty-four percent of Americans would limit abortion to, at most, the first three months of pregnancy, with 58 percent of strongly pro-choice Americans supporting such limits.

The Knights of Columbus/Marist Poll also found that almost three-quarters of Americans (74 percent) favor a ban on abortions after 20 weeks except to save the life of the mother, a majority of Americans (53 percent) believe life begins at conception, and more than 6 in 10 (62 percent) think abortion is morally wrong.

More than 8 in 10 Americans (84 percent) do not see the abortion debate as an all or nothing proposition, saying that laws can protect both the well-being of a woman and the life of the unborn.

Other key findings of the survey include:

• 80 percent support parental notification before a minor can obtain an abortion.

• 79 percent support a 24-hour waiting period prior to having an abortion.

• 76 percent oppose allowing abortions to be performed by non-doctors.

• 62 percent want to change laws to allow for some restrictions on abortion.

• 58 percent support showing a woman an ultrasound image of her baby at least a day before an abortion.

• 57 percent believe abortion does a woman more harm than good in the long run.

• 55 percent — including 6 in 10 Millennials (adults 18 to 32) — want continued debate on the abortion issue.

On a related note, the survey also found that more than 7 in 10 Americans (71 percent) also believe that freedom of religion should be protected above government laws.

Liberal Democrats running the Party are the extremists, not Rand Paul or those who believe in abolishing late-term abortion.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iknownothing; schultz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Once again ... Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz spouts lies, advocates for infanticide and ignores the truth ...

Hey! I wasn't told that you can ask me questions. When I'm 'super concerned' I don't need to justify it. Gosh!

1 posted on 04/15/2015 5:45:04 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Do libs make an effort to match their inside and outside repulsiveness?

Just wondering.


2 posted on 04/15/2015 5:50:53 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Debbie Wasserman is a vile killer. Existentially she is no different than the thugs who implemented the Holocaust.


3 posted on 04/15/2015 5:51:13 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

She makes me ill...


4 posted on 04/15/2015 5:51:33 AM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Maybe thinks the Mayonnaise “product” she uses is a balm against evil spirits.


5 posted on 04/15/2015 5:52:28 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Nah, I only heard that he would let Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz die.

Big difference.


6 posted on 04/15/2015 5:52:31 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

It may seem callous, but it is pretty amusing that the ONLY medical issue the Dems want to leave someone (always a woman) and her doctor is reproductive choices.

All others require deep and invasive government oversight and involvement. For peoples’ own good ...


7 posted on 04/15/2015 5:54:25 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Debbie Wasserman Schultz wants to kill babies.

I wonder if she has some sort of ‘snuff film’ fetish?


8 posted on 04/15/2015 5:55:09 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I am concerned Debbie Wasserman Schultz will “Let Women Die” or something......


9 posted on 04/15/2015 5:57:22 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

This entire debate seems to be making distinctions without difference. Whether aborted with a morning after pill or at full term, the baby ends up dead, so what are they really debating? The grimness of the remains?

I do like that Rand threw the debate back in their face.


10 posted on 04/15/2015 5:58:25 AM PDT by IamConservative (If fighting fire with fire is a good idea, why do the pros use water?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

It is curious but oddly consistent. Anything that makes the feral gummint stronger they are for it.


11 posted on 04/15/2015 5:58:26 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

of the 50 million children aborted, about 25 million would have been women... debbie and the demoncrats are the killers of women.


12 posted on 04/15/2015 6:01:00 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

She never did say she was against abortion in the third trimester since she is for it up to the first breath.

Pray America is waking


13 posted on 04/15/2015 6:01:05 AM PDT by bray (Cruz to the WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Women AND men die every day from all sorts of things...


14 posted on 04/15/2015 6:02:38 AM PDT by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

someone have pity on this woman and stop quoting here inanities ....


15 posted on 04/15/2015 6:03:17 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Does she mean like with death panels?


16 posted on 04/15/2015 6:05:01 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Nah, it’s just a “I wanna fornicate without consequences” fetish.


17 posted on 04/15/2015 6:06:22 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
"We believe a decision on a woman’s reproductive choices is best left between a woman and her doctor"

And the government through the takeover of healthcare.

18 posted on 04/15/2015 6:06:26 AM PDT by optiguy (If government is the answer, it was a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I think Rand Paul may be the least Staunchly Pro-Life of all the Republican candidates. Wonder why she singled him out?


19 posted on 04/15/2015 6:07:59 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I’m sure she could find someone to fornicate with ...

at 0200 in a truck stop parking lot.


20 posted on 04/15/2015 6:11:31 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson