Posted on 03/31/2015 4:08:46 AM PDT by Biggirl
Gay activists and their leftist allies told us decades ago that same-sex marriage wasn’t on the agenda. All homosexuals wanted was the benefits of marriage, but not the title. That, of course, was a lie.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
What’s Next For Same-Sex Marriage Advocates?
My prediction....NAMBLA.
And that will result in the deaths of quite a few pedophiles.
“Once non-profit status is revoked for churches on the basis of supposed discrimination against homosexuals, those churches become private institutions engaged in commerce. Which means that they are regulated as common businesses under anti-discrimination law.”
That’s simply not true. Nearly every anti-discrimitation law (state or federal) contains exceptions for religious organizations, and those exceptions are NOT dependent on the nonprofit tax status of the organization.
"Women will NEVER serve in combat roles!"
"We don't want same sex MARRIAGE, we just want equal rights!"
The Left hates God and all of His standards. The Church WILL BE has always been the next Primary target!
Protections written into Laws, Regulations or even the Constitution (that "living, breathing Document") mean nothing to the Left.
This movement has boundary issues.
Twenty years ago I would have said much the same thing about laws that require adoption agencies to give children to homosexuals. Or laws that require little girls to share school bathrooms with young men. Or any number of other things. Somehow, somewhere, something went wrong. And I don’t know how to fix it. Sigh...
Good point!
Don’t worry, it’ll get fixed.
But first, there will be a cleansing, Old Testament in scope and nature.
“My prediction....NAMBLA.”
But that was ALWAYS the goal wasn’t it? They can’t reproduce to create more gays, so they have to groom them. Little by little, piece by piece.
More like a New Testament cleansing. Lets see, next on the agenda, Islam gets the bomb, followed by world wide economic collapse and famine. Then it goes up a notch.
The next step would be to go after Muslim bakeries to make sure that they are also forced to bake for gay customers, just as Christian bakers are.
That would be interesting to watch.
What’s next? Growing their own kids to abuse.
See “Two members of the pedophile porn exchange ring Boy Lovers network, Mark J. Newton, 42 and his long-term partner Peter Truong, 36, were busted in 2011 on suspicion that they were sexually molesting their son, born to Russian mother in 2005.”
ABC news Australia did a piece on this ‘couple’ as the poster boys for gay marriage.
Then news broke that they had been sexually abusing their kid since the age of two.
The Russians paid attention and changed their adoption laws.
Why are not we?
http://rt.com/news/pedophile-syndicate-russian-boy-481/
Once they roll Indiana they’ll have a wide-open field.
A firing squad?
“those exceptions are NOT dependent on the nonprofit tax status of the organization.”
In a way, they are. The exemptions only apply to religious organizations, but who decides who qualifies as a religious organization?
The answer, strangely enough, is the IRS. They are the only agency or arm of the Federal government that is specifically tasked with addressing the question. That’s why the Scientologists fought so hard for their IRS tax exemption, because until they had it, they were liable for all sorts of lawsuits on labor laws, etc, that religious organizations are exempt from.
Fair point, though in any case brought under an anti-discrimination law, the court that hears the case would determine whether the religious exemption applies. There’s obviously a risk that the court would look at the IRS determination as dispositive, but it should not (and may not). And, in any event, I don’t think that we, as conservatives, should simply concede that the IRS has that kind of power (as Shapiro seems to concede).
Polygamy. Especially with the headlines of February and March 2015 with the lesbian “throuple” (three-couple) and “fairytale wedding” in Thailand of three men.
If the marriage isn’t limited to one man and one woman, it can be two men or three women. And you get Muslims standing up saying “we need legitimacy of our families, too”.
On this issue, as with many others, I feel like Fred Flintstone trying to stop his car with his feet - and the car is going faster and faster downhill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.