Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sowell: Etiquette Versus Annihilation (0bama & Iran)
Creators Syndicate ^ | March 31, 2015 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 03/30/2015 2:28:39 PM PDT by jazusamo

Recent statements from United Nations officials, that Iran is already blocking their existing efforts to keep track of what is going on in their nuclear program, should tell anyone who does not already know it that any agreement with Iran will be utterly worthless in practice. It doesn't matter what the terms of the agreement are, if Iran can cheat.

It is amazing — indeed, staggering — that so few Americans are talking about what it would mean for the world's biggest sponsor of international terrorism, Iran, to have nuclear bombs, and to be developing intercontinental missiles that can deliver them far beyond the Middle East.

Back during the years of the nuclear stand-off between the Soviet Union and the United States, contemplating what a nuclear war would be like was called "thinking the unthinkable." But surely the Nazi Holocaust during World War II should tell us that what is beyond the imagination of decent people is by no means impossible for people who, as Churchill warned of Hitler before the war, had "currents of hatred so intense as to sear the souls of those who swim upon them."

Have we not already seen that kind of hatred in the Middle East? Have we not seen it in suicide bombings there and in suicide attacks against America by people willing to sacrifice their own lives by flying planes into massive buildings, to vent their unbridled hatred?

The Soviet Union was never suicidal, so the fact that we could annihilate their cities if they attacked ours was a sufficient deterrent to a nuclear attack from them. But will that deter fanatics with an apocalyptic vision? Should we bet the lives of millions of Americans on our ability to deter nuclear war with Iran?

(Excerpt) Read more at creators.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aprilfoolsirandeal; iran; iranterrorstate; nucleariran; obama; obamagivesirannukes; sowell; thomassowell

1 posted on 03/30/2015 2:28:39 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abigail2; Amalie; American Quilter; arthurus; awelliott; Bahbah; bamahead; Battle Axe; ...
*PING*
Thomas Sowell

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Recent columns
Lee Kuan Yew (1923-2015)
A Simple Question
Ruinous “Compassion”

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to or removed from the Thomas Sowell ping list…

2 posted on 03/30/2015 2:29:42 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

” In Obama’s vision, as a citizen of the world, there may be no reason why Iran should not have nuclear weapons when other nations have them.”

This is probably half the reason. Wanting Israel blown up is another part.


3 posted on 03/30/2015 2:33:03 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Unlike the Soviets, the Moslem Jihadists welcome a nuclear bomb exchange. Their homicide bombing vests, trucks, etc. show that they have no respect for any life: neither their children nor their own life.

They are waiting for their promised 72 virgins.


4 posted on 03/30/2015 2:34:08 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Wanting Israel blown up is another part.

I totally agree.

5 posted on 03/30/2015 2:38:14 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

The more who find out they’re not waiting the better.


6 posted on 03/30/2015 2:39:58 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george76

Yep - what most view as dissuasion, the Jihadists view as incentive.


7 posted on 03/30/2015 2:40:17 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Liberal cognitive dissonance: Don't trust U.S. citizens to own firearms, but trust Iran with nuclear weapons.
8 posted on 03/30/2015 3:16:57 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

What does Russia think of this deal with Iran? Are they saying anything?


9 posted on 03/31/2015 6:38:14 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Putin is supporting the Shia Moslems in Iran and their puppets against Jews and Sunni Moslems.


10 posted on 03/31/2015 6:58:09 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson