Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Vid shows Stealthy Shipping Containerization of Missiles, UAV's, Command Modules
Daily Military Defence & War Archive, MorinformSystem-Agat ^ | March 25, 2017 | me

Posted on 03/24/2015 5:37:26 PM PDT by gaijin

Some five years ago Russia marketed a disturbing new missile product; the modularized "klub" missile in 3 variants; anti-ship, anti-sub and land attack.

Fair enough, but the scary part was the innovative packaging --they were presented in the form of ready-to-fire units fully integrated into common shipping containers, complete with vertical launch system, booster unit with thrust vectoring, etc.

Conceivably a totally innocuous-looking transport ship could be packing Armageddon, or close, and make it's hostile intentions detectable only at the last possible moment as it approached an unwitting target --the dream scenario of any bad actor.

The Russians appear to have expanded on that marketing theme to include containerized command modules and even helicopter UAV's.

The video plays from the 1 minute point, where the essentials are graphically presented.

Be sure to catch the last minute of the video, which contains heavy allusions to the troubles in the Crimea, Ukraine, etc.

The Russians appear to be marketing a totally-integrated, mobile missile strike system that would be totally stealthy, containerized and potentially ideal for rogue, non-state actors.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: missile; russia; weapons
Some five years ago Russia marketed a disturbing new missile product; the modularized "klub" missile in 3 variants; anti-ship, anti-sub and land attack.

Fair enough, but the scary part was the innovative packaging --they were presented in the form of ready-to-fire units fully integrated into common shipping containers, complete with vertical launch system, booster unit with thrust vectoring, etc.

Conceivably a totally innocuous-looking transport ship could be packing Armageddon, or close, and make it's hostile intentions detectable only at the last possible moment as it approached an unwitting target --the dream scenario of any bad actor.

The Russians appear to have expanded on that marketing theme to include containerized command modules and even helicopter UAV's.

The video plays from the 1 minute point, where the essentials are graphically presented.

1 posted on 03/24/2015 5:37:26 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gaijin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-_NUVtxg2Kg#t=55


2 posted on 03/24/2015 5:37:37 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Could these deliver an EMP weapon?


3 posted on 03/24/2015 5:40:57 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Be kinda ironic if some country used one against Russia.


4 posted on 03/24/2015 5:43:14 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

They’re not saying that, but going that route IMO would not take that much extra effort.

I’m not an expert, but I feared exactly what you did.

Eh..I have a bad feeling about all this.

This lends itself very, very readily to the whole Asymmetric Warfare thing.

It also seems they’re marketing to Asian customers (think Senkaku Islands, Taiwan Straits).


5 posted on 03/24/2015 5:46:47 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

6 posted on 03/24/2015 5:48:33 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Well obviously, Iran is part of Russia’s delivery system in several ways. Russia has a long history of using countries like Iran.


7 posted on 03/24/2015 5:49:01 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
"Could these deliver an EMP weapon?"

These could.

Iran readies launch of new satellite
(Iran's second satellite launch, 11/09/2009
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2382720/posts

US confirms Iran launch of first home-built satellite
afp ^ | 2-03-09 | staff
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2177582/posts

Iran Satellite Launch Heightens Missile Development Concerns
By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, Feb. 3, 2009
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=52939

Iran hails successful launch of satellite rocket
Posted on Wed 03 Feb 2010 02:51:50 AM MST
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2443266/posts

Iran fires satellite carrier into space
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2443258/posts

Iran Launches Third Satellite
(2012)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2841888/posts

Lawmaker: Iran's Revolutionary Guard Practicing for An EMP Attack on the United States
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2806848/posts

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/1984/ERD.htm
EMP
Submitted To
Mr. Wiggins
In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements
for Written Communications
The Marine Corps Command and Staff College
Quantico, Virginia
Major R. D. Erick
United States Marine Corps
April 6, 1984
Excerpt:
“However, the effects produced by a nuclear explosion were not fully realized until the “Johnston Island Test” in 1962. This nuclear blast had a yield of 1.4 megatons at an altitude of 250 miles. The explosion damaged a number of low earth orbit satellites and caused malfunctions and early failure of others. Another effect that was noted during the blast was a blackout up to 600 miles away of high frequency radio communications that lasted for hours. It was caused by disruption of the ionosphere. It also popped circuit breakers, street lights went out, burglar alarms rang, and power lines went down in Honolulu, about 800 miles away. In Nov. 1962, all above ground testing was halted and our testing and analysis was limited to underground testing, analysis of the existing atmospheric test data, nonnuclear simulation, and theoretical calculations.”


8 posted on 03/24/2015 5:53:23 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Iran Placing Medium-Range Missiles in Venezuela; Can Reach the U.S. (12/09/10)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2640111/posts

‘Die Welt’: Iran building rocket bases in Venezuela (17 May 2011)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2721122/posts

Russia engages in 'gangland' diplomacy as it sends warship to the Caribbean (Exercise with Venezuelan military, 2008)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2088262/posts
(from 2006)

There's also Russia's work with North Korea.


9 posted on 03/24/2015 5:56:27 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Pretty smart to use shipping containers. Why didn’t we think of that?


10 posted on 03/24/2015 5:57:03 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Thanks.


11 posted on 03/24/2015 6:00:39 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd
Why didn’t we think of that?

Too practical. If you can't spend billions in R&D and cost over runs then it won't work.

12 posted on 03/24/2015 6:05:12 PM PDT by BBell (breathe easy obey the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

They wouldn’t because Russia still demonstrates balls and would wipe anyone related to the attack off the map.

We would send John Kerry with a strongly worded letter and every enemy knows it


13 posted on 03/24/2015 6:14:05 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

I’m sure we have similar systems for special ops.

The Russians are just crazy enough to sell it


14 posted on 03/24/2015 6:15:11 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

“Pretty smart to use shipping containers. Why didn’t we think of that?”

If an enemy is going after your systems, how long until they run out of smart bombs plinking every empty shipping container in Asia??


15 posted on 03/24/2015 6:24:09 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Why fool with something like that when you can embed a nuclear device inside a merchant ship while in a yard for work unknown to all of the crew except for one who will join later. The ship goes about its business until months or years later it’s chartered for a cargo for NJ. The ship will end up in the Hudson before it’s detonated.

We’ll never see it coming.


16 posted on 03/24/2015 6:29:47 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

True. Smart weapons proved not to be a silver bullet it initially appeared. They are good at killing high-value targets and making good footage for TV while targeting some less valuable assets but you can’t win a war against semi-advanced adversary this way.


17 posted on 03/24/2015 6:37:23 PM PDT by Paid_Russian_Troll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Second_After


18 posted on 03/24/2015 7:00:03 PM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson