Skip to comments.
Topless woman removed from House of Commons after protesting anti-terror bill
National Post ^
| March 23, 2015
| Jake Edmiston
Posted on 03/23/2015 8:12:35 PM PDT by RansomOttawa
A topless woman protesting the Conservative governments anti-terror bill was ejected from the House of Commons on Monday during a discussion about honouring Vietnamese refugees.
The protester, Neda Topaloski with the Canadian wing of the international Femen movement, was in the sitting in public gallery, with two guards standing nearby on either side of her, she said. One of the security guards stepped out briefly, so seeing an opportunity, she took off her shirt. The officers gave chase and Ms. Topaloski ran about the gallery, screaming: C-51 is war on freedom.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalpost.com ...
TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attentionwhore; canada; femen; topless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: RansomOttawa; Slings and Arrows; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; ...
Normally the only pair of boobs seen in the House of Commons are Trudeau & Mulcair.
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.
Canada Ping!
21
posted on
03/23/2015 8:44:35 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
To: RansomOttawa
She wouldn’t try it here because she’d be indisguishable from all the other boobs.
22
posted on
03/23/2015 8:49:06 PM PDT
by
bramps
(Go West America!)
To: RansomOttawa
Shouldn’t that be Neda Topalonski???
23
posted on
03/23/2015 9:10:50 PM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: Peter ODonnell
As Connie Fournier, founder of Free Dominion, says, even if you accept that this government would not abuse the legislation, a future government might turn it against conservatives.It is wise to not grant any more power to government than you would have used against you.
We have seen how totalitarian progress has been made in America, if not by one side, then by the other, always for altruistic motive, and (so far, at some point) turned against the citizenry. While the EPA is one shining example, the provisions found in the Patriot Act, the NDAA, and other legislation remain available to be used against the people if those who are in office so choose. Never give them a bigger stick than you want to be beaten with.
24
posted on
03/23/2015 9:14:38 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Army Air Corps
25
posted on
03/23/2015 9:16:40 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Well, they did manage to shave their pits.
26
posted on
03/23/2015 9:19:16 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Those women really are topless. I’ve seen men at the beach with more cleavage.
To: Steve_Seattle
Your statement is probably some form of micro aggression.
28
posted on
03/23/2015 9:21:16 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
The blonde appears to be sniffing her armpit.
29
posted on
03/23/2015 9:22:46 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
I think I knocked boots with that blonde.
She kept saying, “Get off my arm.”
30
posted on
03/23/2015 9:34:36 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: RansomOttawa
Please keep us abreast of the situation.
31
posted on
03/23/2015 9:41:19 PM PDT
by
Veggie Todd
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
To: RightGeek
Send her to ISIS. She'll be topless in no time.
32
posted on
03/23/2015 9:45:55 PM PDT
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: Steve_Seattle
“Those women really are topless. Ive seen men at the beach with more cleavage.”
Yeah, like two eggs, fried!
To: Army Air Corps
"Your statement is probably some form of micro aggression."
I guess I'm just disappointed that about 95% of these feminists who go topless to protest something usually don't have much need for a bra in the first place. They don't give me the cheap thrill that I was looking for, so I lash out at them.
To: Steve_Seattle
They don't give me the cheap thrill that I was looking for, so I lash out at them.
Thanks for rapping with the group and sharing the root of your pain. We'll workshop how to deal with this angst.
35
posted on
03/23/2015 10:37:21 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Steve_Seattle
Even flat femnazis like flattery.
Next time stare right at them lowbeams and say something like: “Hey, nice flapjacks!” or “Bitchin’ jahoobies. Can I adjust ‘em?”
I’m pretty sure that should elicit some sort of response.
36
posted on
03/23/2015 10:43:42 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: tumblindice
PS And “Nice nips!” Make lots of smooching noises: “Mah Mah! Mah Mah.” Smack your lips.
Women teetering on the precipice of lesbianism need a lot of aural persuasion.
37
posted on
03/23/2015 10:49:03 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: RansomOttawa
She was removed “after” protesting anti-terror bill.. All in the House had time to get a good look.
38
posted on
03/24/2015 2:19:44 AM PDT
by
maddog55
(America Rising a new Civil War needs to happen.)
To: RansomOttawa
39
posted on
03/24/2015 3:53:07 AM PDT
by
kanawa
To: Squawk 8888
Well, it’s not like she broke any laws.
40
posted on
03/24/2015 5:09:09 AM PDT
by
Snowyman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson