OBAMA MULLS SUPPORTING UN RESOLUTION THAT PUSHES ISRAEL BACK TO PRE-1967 BORDERS

Breitbart ^ | March 19, 2015 | by JORDAN SCHACHTEL

[Yaelle]

Bibi should tell 0 to go pound sand & that he will do an info release if 0 doesn’t back off.

---

PLEASE, Bibi!!! Now is the time!!!!! Slowly let what you know about Obama’s past out, drib by drab, but start today!!!!!

[matthew fuller]

Permanent Members

China
France
Russia
United Kingdom
United States

I think maybe France or the UK or both before Russia or China.

[matthew fuller]

Permanent Members

China
France
Russia
United Kingdom
United States

I think maybe France or the UK or both before Russia or China.

[Mike Darancette]

I hope the Brits (not on good terms with Obama) veto any UN action. Churchill would.

[Mike Darancette]

UK may well veto, maybe even France.

[Pollster1]

0bama really wants to push Israel back to its pre-1948 borders, but not to its Bronze and Iron Age borders or to its borders from before the Roman conquest of 63 BC, 6 AD, and 135 AD. It’s all about wiping out the Jews, and indefensible borders are an attractive first step to bigots who are hoping for genocide.

[combat_boots]

The propaganda machine appears to be a worldwide effort against Israel.

The simplest explanation is the best: destruction. Giving up the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem, etc., eliminates the high ground and moral imperative Israel has. They WON territory to protect themselves.

[who knows what evil?]

A curse upon those who voted for Obama.

[Jimmy Valentine]

Giving up the Golan Heights gives Israel’s enemies the ability to hit the entire country with artillery fire. Israelis are not suicidal

[Star Traveler]

For the UK, it depends on what Netanyahu does! The British government actually blocked the Jews every way they could to try and prevent them from having a state in 1948. They are STILL NOT FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ... they never really have been!!

British deputy PM: If Netanyahu rejects two-state solution, U.K. will recognize Palestine
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.647834

If Netanyahu rules out a Palestinian state and expands West Bank settlements, ‘the world, including the British parliament, would have no option, but to recognize a Palestinian state,’ says Nick Clegg.

British Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for reneging support for a two-state solution, saying that if the Israeli leader does not backtrack from those remarks, Britain would have no choice but to recognize a Palestinian state.

Clegg, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, called Netanyahu’s vow not to create a Palestinian state “alarming,” the Guardian reported Thursday.

Netanyahu, while campaigning Monday, said that if he were to be reelected, a Palestinian state would not be created, in a definite disavowal of his 2009 speech, in which he had voiced support for the principle of two states for two peoples.

[SJackson]

Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

[Pearls Before Swine]

it’s almost like Obama would like to see Israel not be able to defend itself.

I think your statement would be more accurate with the removal of the first three words.

[ColdOne]

I luv that picture!!!

[matthew fuller]

I wasn’t aware of that relationship.

[Chode]

yup, the kid is spot on