Posted on 03/19/2015 5:51:57 AM PDT by Enlightened1
People receiving food stamps have to pass drug tests or meet work requirements to receive taxpayer dollars, Sanchez reasoned, so it’s only fair that those “lucky” enough to inherit wealth should have to do something to earn it or, in this case, pay a tax.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Teddy Kennedy never would have passed.
Why is it that dhimmis think they are the gate keepers to other peoples money?
The whole effin’ clan would be out on the street.
They do??? Since when?
Just when I think liberals can’t get any more insane, they prove me wrong.
You don’t think the Kennedy’s know how to cheat the system?
This can only come from a mindset that rejects the idea of private property in favor of all wealth being collective property under control of the benevolent State.
As long as it applies to Chelsea, the obama girls, and others like them.
The retarded Ms. Sanchez needs to STFU. Until she knows what the hell her tired @$$ is talking about, she needs to keep her dumbass mouth shut. The ho really needs to spend a day with one of the welfare fraud investigators from her state. Either that or go home to Mexico.
God’s Wisdom:
Prov 13:22
A good man leaves an inheritance to his [a]children’s children
So, of course, a Dem would adhere to the opposite belief.
Seriously, where do these tyrants get off thinking they have any inherent right to be involved in wealth transfer to begin with? The wealth has ALREADY been earned AND taxed. Rotten freedom-hating, success punishing bastards.
“This can only come from a mindset that rejects the idea of private property in favor of all wealth being collective property under control of the benevolent State.”
Absolutely. This also applies to any sentence Obama has ever uttered that included the phrase “fair share”.
The Left spends so much time calling all of us racists for no reason whatsoever, it wouldn’t hurt if we occasionally spoke the truth and called them out for being communists.
Thus they were killed to make way for the leeches to follow ...
I know 1 of mine wouldn’t. But he is the most frugal with his money. If he does not have money to buy weed, he goes with out.
But then I was smart. While we don’t have a ton of money, we are a blended both widows with grown kids family. We tied every thing up into a Marital Trust, and then in to another set of 3 Trust should both of us pass. No Probate. They already know to roll over the 2 small IRA’s. Hubby is already forced to draw the min. out of his. The only thing they have to deal with is burial, which is already per-arranged and paid for. And selling off the house, which goes into the 3 trust funds. And I made sure my eldest does not inherit a dime. Nor can he get his fingers into my grandson’s trust fund. He is not the named trustee. He is a spendthrift. Personal items of value are already targeted to the person to receive them.
Not on the list tough.
We could start, at least, with pointing out their collectivist assumptions,
and require them to explain the validity of their collectivist assumptions
before we even give any attention whatsoever to the conclusions they come to based on those assumptions.
Usually, what you get out of them is that the individual couldn’t have amassed the wealth that he has without the protection of the collective.
To which I say that that must be a voluntary association, which requires that they are OK with people opting out.
“Why is that [a single mother] should be drug tested, which is an unrelated requirement to receive food assistance, to make sure that her family has enough to eat,”
these two comments show the disconnect in the liberal brain.
how does this enlightened "latina" know the family inheriting the 10 mil wasn't working all along in the business?
yet somehow, a woman who has indicated by her actions that she's irresponsible and has made babies is able to call upon the state (taxpayer) to "help" her due to her actions with no confirmation to the state that she's not wasting money on drugs, etc.
unbelieveable.
Recipients of Section 8 housing should be required to submit to monthly drug testing.
They way it currently works, if you don’t use illegal drugs, you don’t get welfare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.