Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The E-mail Scandal Won’t Doom Hillary
National Review ^ | March 06, 2013 | JONAH GOLDBERG

Posted on 03/06/2015 8:53:56 PM PST by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: dragnet2
This is about taking glaring unauthorized security risks, operating outside of protocol with the real potential of causing great harm to the U.S. This is not defensible.

Exactly. This is absolutely gigantic. She operated a global clearing house of every secret we have on an open line, at the level of the Cabinet. This level of treason is almost inconceivable.

21 posted on 03/07/2015 12:10:51 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Podesta will have his work cut out for him on this. Here’s hoping his latest career move is a short one. How many ‘cleanup in aisle 7’ moments will her crew be able to take?


22 posted on 03/07/2015 3:56:34 AM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Seems a HUGE double standard if Hitlary is not charged but one of her former “employees” lost his job for doing exactly the same thing.

How the hell do the Clinton’s keep dodging the hangman’s noose? Amazing!


23 posted on 03/07/2015 3:59:42 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
The question is why would she be communicating in an unauthorized manner outside of protocol?

Why? That's the question that no one is answering even though it's being asked. The responses we get are that she wants everyone to have access to the emails and has released 55,000 pages (whoop-de-doo- a running email could be 10 pages alone) and that Colin Powell and Condi Rice had private emails. Those responses are not answers to why she didn't use an official state department email for official business.

Unless she gives a good reason (I don't know that there is a good reason), speculation will run rampant about her purposes.

24 posted on 03/07/2015 5:04:29 AM PST by randita (Obama entrusted the transformation of the best healthcare system in the world to a scam artist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The Donkeys are xcrewed. They put all of their rotten eggs in on hellinahandbasket. The MSM’s talking up of Jebba the Butt for the GOPe primaries is cankle’s only hope.


25 posted on 03/07/2015 5:07:55 AM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Then there was Bobby Kennedy.

In reality Nuc from orbit might be a little over the top


26 posted on 03/07/2015 5:11:36 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

She had a lot of emails. Just who was she communicating with? Are we really to believe that no one who received email from her noticed her email address? Not Obama, nor Valerie, nor any other cabinet or military leaders? Wouldn’t THEY have them archived somewhere, or did they all have private emails, too?


27 posted on 03/07/2015 7:41:18 AM PST by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
The question is why would she be communicating in an unauthorized manner outside of protocol?

That's the question that no one is answering even though it's being asked. Unless she gives a good reason (I don't know that there is a good reason), speculation will run rampant about her purposes.

Without an answer the only think left is speculation. Their evasive spin on this is speeding up the rotation of the planet.

28 posted on 03/07/2015 10:02:57 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

I’ve heard several other Democrats mentioned, all with pretty low voter recognition. One is Amy Klobuchar. If they were to nominate her, they’d have to count on the Republicans nominating someone with a name even harder to spell. Maybe Jarrod Saltalamacchia (if he is old enough), not a Walker or Bush or Cruz or Perry.


29 posted on 03/07/2015 12:15:58 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

I’ve heard several other Democrats mentioned, all with pretty low voter recognition. One is Amy Klobuchar. If they were to nominate her, they’d have to count on the Republicans nominating someone with a name even harder to spell. Maybe Jarrod Saltalamacchia (if he is old enough), not a Walker or Bush or Cruz or Perry.


30 posted on 03/07/2015 12:15:59 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Just checked—Jarrod will be 31 in 2016, so the Republicans would have to pick someone else.


31 posted on 03/07/2015 12:18:17 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The media my try to cover for Hillary, but the public will never buy it.

Witness the Hillary book tour. Hillary was given a $14 million advance. How many books were sold.

Despite what the MSM is selling, the public ain’t buying.


32 posted on 03/07/2015 12:53:26 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson