Media Matters founder wants New York Times 'correction' on Hillary emails report (90s nostalgia)

Washington Examiner ^ | March 4, 2015 | Eddie Scarry

[C19fan]

David Brock, founder of the liberal Media Matters watchdog and a Hillary Clinton loyalist, said on Wednesday that a New York Times report on Clinton's email practices while secretary of state was "sloppily done" and "based on a false premise."

"The piece didn't stand up to scrutiny after it was published," said Brock on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," where he called on the Times to issue a correction to the report, which was written by Michael S. Schmidt and published Monday night.

[C19fan]

Flipping the channels and David Brock was on " Morning Joe". The guy did not live down his reputation as a PIAPS sycophant. Nobody else on the show was buying his bull turds including the Lefties. The worst part of this election is seeing all these Clinton hacks come out of the woodwork like Brock.

[Gaffer]

I’m thinking that even the Clintons and their sycophants can’t shovel deep or fast enough to keep the sh!t from piling up on the driveway.

It is thoroughly enjoyable to witness.

[cripplecreek]

So is David Brock still keeping the blinds closed so Glenn Beck’s sniper teams don’t get him?

[cripplecreek]

Even Salon is saying that there is a real fire to go with the smoke.

[Gaffer]

good news...I’m hoping the collective leftist leftovers want Warren in her stead. Hillary would never give any money to her (she has billions).

[DJ MacWoW]

The FReepathon Is Almost Over

Please Donate And End It

[scooby321]

Hey David its the Democrats who want rid of her

[Durus]

Liberals always support liberals even when you know they genuinely despise each other such as Obama and Clinton. Republicans are just the opposite, they fall over each other in a rush to the first to decry whatever pretended slight the media is selling, either real or imagined.

If a Republican had done this, the media would be showing interview after interview with fellow Republicans calling for investigations and criminal charges.

[Gaffer]

Liberals always support liberals .......

This is probably the first time outside of the ridiculous "Anthony Weiner" debacle where I feel that tenet isn't operative.

I think there is definitely some frustration, jealousy, anger and potential retribution going on here along with a desire to support a more less-baggage and pliable candidate. I just don't think it's in that b!tch's favor right now. If they really decide to let loose with all the pent up dirt they know about her, she won't survive it as a candidate.

[mass55th]

He’s just p*ssed at the Times for uncovering his questionable fundraising tactics while working for Hillary’s PAC. He recently quit his post there, when it was found he was paying a commission to a fundraiser, Mary Pat Bonner from the campaign donations she collected for Brock’s groups. She received a 12.5% commission, something none of the donors were advised of.

[miss marmelstein]

And what a bizarre looking creature!

[tcrlaf]

TRANSLATION:

Retract any truth that could harm Hillary, or find that your next Tina Brown Party Invite gets “lost in mail”.

In today’s media, that could be a career-ending “mistake”.