Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to ban bullets by executive action, threatens top-selling AR-15 rifle
Washington Examiner2-26-2015 ^ | 2-26-2015 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 02/26/2015 9:14:31 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather

It’s started.

As promised, President Obama is using executive actions to impose gun control on the nation, targeting the top-selling rifle in the country, the AR-15 style semi-automatic, with a ban on one of the most-used AR bullets by sportsmen and target shooters.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives this month revealed that it is putting the ban on 5.56mm ammo on a fast track, immediately driving up the price of the bullets and prompting retailers, including the huge outdoors company Cabela’s, to urge sportsmen to urge Congress to stop the president.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2a; 2ndamendment; ar15; ban; banbullets; banglist; bullets; executiveaction; executivefiat; executiveorder; guncontrol; gungrabbers; imperialpresidency; obama; rkba; secondamendment; unconstitutional; uniparty; weakpatriots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 401-403 next last
To: DesertRhino

Severely conservative, whatever that is.....


161 posted on 02/26/2015 10:45:59 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace- No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

lol No it didn’t. I forgot the /s tag.


162 posted on 02/26/2015 10:46:08 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules (The last suit you wear has no pockets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

I don’t think it’s a diversion from taking over the internet, I think it’s in conjunction with taking over the internet.

The objective is to create civil unrest, it’s what community organizers do.

Creating civil unrest at the same time they have once again come out with another DHS report on “right wing extremist” being more of a threat than ISIS isn’t just a coincidence IMO.


163 posted on 02/26/2015 10:47:26 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

And if Cruz doesn’t get the nomination, you’ll probably sit it out.

You need to get over it and face up to the fact that you didn’t oppose Obama.

Walker-Cruz 2016


164 posted on 02/26/2015 10:47:28 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

What does AP stand for?


165 posted on 02/26/2015 10:48:19 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Clap! Clap!
+1


166 posted on 02/26/2015 10:48:46 AM PST by Jay Thomas (If not for my faith in Christ, I would despair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: AlanGreenSpam

Exactly. And Romney would have gotten people back to work.


167 posted on 02/26/2015 10:49:32 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Their insistence on a pure conservative guaranteed the reelection of a pure Marxist. Talk about dupes......


168 posted on 02/26/2015 10:49:41 AM PST by clintonh8r (ISIS IS ISlam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Is this what you moderates wanted?

When the moderates were sitting on their asses, being the smartest people in the room, lecturing us about the “extremism” on the right the left was taking over.


169 posted on 02/26/2015 10:51:42 AM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; Alia; altura; ...

Ammo ban nanny state PING!


170 posted on 02/26/2015 10:52:37 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata
Where did I say that I sat out and didn't vote for Romney?
Or that I had any intent of sitting out of (2016?
I await your crystal ball response.

You are now in the category of Troll.

171 posted on 02/26/2015 10:53:53 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

You forgot Dole.....


172 posted on 02/26/2015 10:54:38 AM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Again...I think you are over-simplifying it and incorrect about your interpretation. Below is the BTAFE definition of “armor piercing” ammunition:

Armor piercing ammunition

18 U.S.C., § 921(a)(17)(B)
•A projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium; or

•A full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.

The only exception is based on the US Attorney General exempting rounds used for sporting or specific industrial purposes (BTW the AG is anti-gun). The new EO rule is stating that 5.56mm and any round available in a handgun platform that can penetrate soft body armor is no longer deemed as exempt for sporting purposes.

As you will note, the requirement for armor piercing is that the ammo is larger than .22 caliber and can be made from any number of common alloy casings in whole or in combination. A steel or solid core is NOT a requirement (i.e green tip ammo).

As I stated, using the BATFE definition of AP, this rule change could include all high velocity ammo that is capable of penetrating soft body armor and can be found in a handgun platform. This is basically any high velocity caliber ammo from .223/5.56 to .50 caliber.

I don’t think this is a scare tactic. I think this is back-door gun control.


173 posted on 02/26/2015 10:55:02 AM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

Like I said on another thread, I only voted for Romney (and McCain) because he was running against a communist. If his opponent had been a garden-variety liberal statist, I wouldn’t have given Romney the time of day.


174 posted on 02/26/2015 10:55:54 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
You didn't answer my question. Where did I say that I didn't vote for Romney?
You cannot assume, you must have a reason. Lets hear it.
175 posted on 02/26/2015 10:56:29 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules
Then just buy .223!

First the Emperor came for the machine guns, and I did not speak out because I did not have a machine gun.

Then the Emperor came for the Hi-Cap mags, and I did not speak out because I did not have any Hi-Cap mags.

Then the Emperor came for the battle rifles, and I did not speak out because I did not have a battle rifle.

Then the Emperor came for the assault rifles, and I did not speak out because I did not have an assault rifle.

Thhe Emperor came for the 5.56mm ammo, and I did not speak out because I still had plenty of .223 ammo.

Then the Emperor came for the .223 ammo and there was no one left to stand by me.


176 posted on 02/26/2015 10:57:02 AM PST by Iron Munro (Mark Steyn: "fundamentally transformed" is a euphemism for "wrecked beyond repair.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

[[They continue to try to explain their juvenile refusal to vote for GR by saying that he would have been “just as bad” when in fact that is an intellectually vacant argument. I think they’re basically trying to justify an unjustifiable act. And yet they promise to do the same thing again. And they will have helped another Clinton get elected as surely as they helped Obama get elected.]]

Bingo, spot on assessment


177 posted on 02/26/2015 10:57:16 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
If the President can ignore federal law what's to prevent a governor(s) from ignoring presidential edicts?
178 posted on 02/26/2015 10:57:40 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

Comment #179 Removed by Moderator

To: clintonh8r

Their insistence on a pure conservative guaranteed the reelection of a pure Marxist. Talk about dupes......


That’s true. Those of us who didn’t like Romney loved our country more and acted accordingly.

Useful idiots.


180 posted on 02/26/2015 11:00:53 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 401-403 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson