Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Global warming skeptics know more about climate science
FoxNews.com ^ | February 12, 2015 | Maxim Lott

Posted on 02/12/2015 6:09:07 PM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: SJackson
We skeptics are at a real disadvantage since there is 4 generations of idiot parrots that had their brains twisted in the public school system.
21 posted on 02/12/2015 10:14:28 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Occam's Razor at its most devastating.

It really is isn't it? Someone posted it here a few months ago and I've been running with it. It cuts through the Climate Liar's hype like a razor.

Here is another simple proof that no Climate Liar can answer...

No smoking hot spot

1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.

Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.

If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.


22 posted on 02/12/2015 10:59:14 PM PST by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The question of what gas is attributed by scientists to be causing global warming is loaded. Scientists know that the sun and volcano activity, for example, affects the climate and is not accounted for in the chicken little’s man-made carbon gas climate change models. The carbon based climate models have proven to be wrong.

Finally, throughout history the climate has changed - even before man with suv’s populated the earth.


23 posted on 02/13/2015 8:48:45 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Liberals were more likely to correctly answer questions like: “What gas do most scientists believe causes temperatures to rise?” The correct answer is carbon dioxide.

No it isn't. The correct answer is Water Vapor, which makes up 95% of 'Global Warming' gasses. No water vapor in the atmosphere, and this planet would be an ice cube.

CO2 does not make any difference one way or another.

24 posted on 02/13/2015 7:11:25 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Hydrocarbon Appreciation Day

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

25 posted on 02/13/2015 8:22:26 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“Liberals were more likely to correctly answer questions like: “What gas do most scientists believe causes temperatures to rise?” The correct answer is carbon dioxide.”

This is wrong in the context of global warming. Because the more carbon dioxide that is released the less the warming.

The most potent green house gas is water vapor followed by methane.

I am assuming they arrived at this answer by asking anyone who is a scientist without regard for their knowledge of climate change.


26 posted on 02/14/2015 9:41:25 AM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

That was my take too. It was a test of knowledge of what other people (themselves assumed to knowledgeable) think about things, rather than what is demonstrably proven or what is consistent with physical science. Meaning, that even if a person scores “poorly”, it doesn’t mean that they’re ignorant or not intelligent.

The pole-ice-melting question was alright, though. That points more to logic and common-sense science knowledge.


27 posted on 02/14/2015 11:49:43 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Oh, the science is “settled”; it’s just wrong (probably).


28 posted on 02/14/2015 11:54:29 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson