Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Seeks to Name Potentially Oil-Rich Part of Alaska Protected 'Wilderness'
CNSNews ^ | January 25, 2015 | AP

Posted on 01/25/2015 11:20:14 AM PST by jazusamo

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is boosting protection of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and will ask Congress to designate more than 12 million acres as a wilderness area, including its potentially oil-rich Coastal Plain.

The designation would seal off the area in Alaska's northeast corner from oil exploration and give it the highest degree of federal protection available to public lands. Obama and the Interior Department announced the effort Sunday.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: agenda21; alaska; coastalplain; energy; govbillwalker; murkowski; nodrilling; obama; oil; wilderness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: jazusamo

United Nations’ agent King Zero brings ‘Agenda 21’ a couple more steps FORWARD.


21 posted on 01/25/2015 11:43:54 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in Alaska

Obama Seeks to Name Potentially Oil-Rich Part of Alaska Protected ‘Wilderness’ -— PING!


22 posted on 01/25/2015 12:03:59 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

there needs to be a law that the government can not own more then 25% of a state. the government controls far to much of Alaska.


23 posted on 01/25/2015 12:10:11 PM PST by PCPOET7 (onated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Won’t happen, His days of land grabs are over.


24 posted on 01/25/2015 12:15:25 PM PST by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“So the next president undoes the designation.”

Don’t count on it. The next president will be from a
choice of two candidates that were chosen for us.
There are only liberals and conservatives and right now
the liberals have a majority in both parties.


25 posted on 01/25/2015 12:16:11 PM PST by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PCPOET7

5% is to much.


26 posted on 01/25/2015 12:26:34 PM PST by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

this country is being run by idiots


27 posted on 01/25/2015 12:31:26 PM PST by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016 (for 16 years of conservative bliss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Obama will never stop trying to screw America while he is in office.........


28 posted on 01/25/2015 12:45:49 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Kenya’s destruction of the United States of America continues.


29 posted on 01/25/2015 12:56:12 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When the hell do I get MY white privilege? I'm tired of busting my @$$ for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
... designate more than 12 million acres as a wilderness area, including its potentially oil-rich Coastal Plain.

I believe that the ultimate goal is not to protect the environment or produce "green" energy. The Libs want to control us. Most of America drives vehicles to get to where they need to go. The control freaks want to throttle that freedom.

30 posted on 01/25/2015 1:19:20 PM PST by VRW Conspirator (American Jobs for American Workers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Obama Seeks to Name Potentially Oil-Rich Part of Alaska Protected 'Wilderness'"

Interesting suggestion. Extract the oil first, then if demRATs still want to turn the area into a protected wilderness, than it might be reconsidered. But they probably couldn't care less then.
31 posted on 01/25/2015 1:27:18 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He needs to raise gas prices. These cheap prices are his worst nightmare.

Pray America is waking


32 posted on 01/25/2015 1:35:15 PM PST by bray (Palin/Cruz to the WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
As with the ANWR issue in Congress when Nancy Pelosi was the House Speaker, this is all just a con game that is being played out against the environmentalist lobby by the Obama administration.

The Federal government will declare some part of Alaska off-limits to oil/gas exploration.

Meanwhile, every energy giant in the world is investing tens of billions of dollars in offshore exploration in the Beaufort Sea and Arctic Ocean that is going to make the energy resources in ANWR completely irrelevant.

Obama will dislocate his shoulder while patting himself on the back.

The environmentalists will think they've won a great victory in Washington, and they won't know any better because 99% of them have probably never been within a thousand miles of ANWR anyway.

The energy sector drills like there's no tomorrow.

33 posted on 01/25/2015 1:38:20 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I wonder if all of this blocking off land is being used as collateral for all of the debt we are issuing and they are just saying it is to protect the environment.
34 posted on 01/25/2015 1:39:09 PM PST by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Perchance a strong wind would blow the dumbo eared boy king out to sea.


35 posted on 01/25/2015 3:35:26 PM PST by Big Red Badger ( - William Diamonds Drum - can You Hear it G man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

I tend to agree with you. my mistake in being liberal with the land percentage on a conservative site. my personal feeling is to limit land ownership to military bases government buildings like Quart houses and legislative governing buildings. Unless federal land is being used it should be in state control. I look at federal control of land as a cancer on economic development.


36 posted on 01/25/2015 4:00:33 PM PST by PCPOET7 (onated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Devious.


37 posted on 01/25/2015 5:00:05 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson