Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Emerging Iranian Empire: The Obama Administration Acquiesces to the New Reality
National Review ^ | 01/23/2015 | Charles Krauthhammer

Posted on 01/23/2015 6:57:52 AM PST by SeekAndFind

While Iran’s march toward a nuclear bomb has provoked a major clash between the White House and Congress, Iran’s march toward conventional domination of the Arab world has been largely overlooked. In Washington, that is. The Arabs have noticed. And the pro-American ones, the Gulf Arabs in particular, are deeply worried.

This week, Iranian-backed Houthi rebels seized control of the Yemeni government, heretofore pro-American. In September, they overran Sanaa, the capital. On Tuesday, they seized the presidential palace. On Thursday, they forced the president to resign.

The Houthi have local religious grievances, being Shiites in a majority Sunni land. But they are also agents of Shiite Iran, which arms, trains, and advises them. Their slogan — “God is great. Death to America. Death to Israel” — could have been written in Persian.

Why should we care about the coup? First, because we depend on Yemen’s government to support our drone war against another local menace, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). It’s not clear if we can even maintain our embassy in Yemen, let alone conduct operations against AQAP. And second, because growing Iranian hegemony is a mortal threat to our allies and interests in the entire Middle East.

In Syria, Iran’s power is similarly rising. The mullahs rescued the reeling regime of Bashar al-Assad by sending in weapons, money, and Iranian revolutionary guards, as well as by ordering their Lebanese proxy, Hezbollah, to join the fight. They succeeded. The moderate rebels are in disarray, even as Assad lives in de facto coexistence with the Islamic State, which controls a large part of his country.

Iran’s domination of Syria was further illustrated by a strange occurrence last Sunday in the Golan Heights. An Israeli helicopter attacked a convoy on the Syrian side of the armistice line. Those killed were not Syrian, however, but five Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon and several Iranian officials, including a brigadier general.

What were they doing in the Syrian Golan Heights? Giving “crucial advice,” announced the Iranian government. On what? Well, three days earlier, Hezbollah’s leader had threatened an attack on Israel’s Galilee. Tehran appears to be using its control of Syria and Hezbollah to create its very own front against Israel.

The Israelis can defeat any conventional attack. Not so the Gulf Arabs. To the north and west, they see Iran creating a satellite “Shiite Crescent” stretching to the Mediterranean and consisting of Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. To their south and west, they see Iran gaining proxy control of Yemen. And they are caught in the pincer.

The Saudis are fighting back the only way they can — with massive production of oil at a time of oversupply and collapsing prices, placing enormous economic pressure on Iran. It needs $136 oil to maintain its budget. The price is today below $50.

Yet the Obama administration appears to be ready to acquiesce to the new reality of Iranian domination of Syria. It has told the New York Times that it is essentially abandoning its proclaimed goal of removing Assad.

For the Saudis and the other Gulf Arabs, this is a nightmare. They’re engaged in a titanic regional struggle with Iran. And they are losing — losing Yemen, losing Lebanon, losing Syria, and watching post-U.S.-withdrawal Iraq come under increasing Iranian domination.

The nightmare would be hugely compounded by Iran going nuclear. The Saudis were already stupefied that the U.S. conducted secret negotiations with Tehran behind their backs. And they can see where the current talks are headed — legitimizing Iran as a threshold nuclear state.

Which makes all the more incomprehensible President Obama’s fierce opposition to Congress’s offer to strengthen the American negotiating hand by passing sanctions to be triggered if Iran fails to agree to give up its nuclear program. After all, that was the understanding Obama gave Congress when he began these last-ditch negotiations in the first place.

Why are you parroting Tehran’s talking points, Mr. President? asks Democratic senator Bob Menendez. Indeed, why are we endorsing Iran’s claim that sanctions relief is the new norm? Obama assured the nation that sanctions relief was but a temporary concession to give last-minute, time-limited negotiations a chance.

Twice the deadline has come. Twice no new sanctions, just unconditional negotiating extensions.

Our regional allies — Saudi Arabia, the other five Gulf states, Jordan, Egypt, and Israel — are deeply worried. Tehran is visibly on the march on the ground and openly on the march to nuclear status. And their one great ally, their strategic anchor for two generations, is acquiescing to both.

— Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aqap; caliphate; dronestrikes; empire; iran; iranempire; krauthammer; nucleariran; nuclearweapons; obama; obamairan; shiites

1 posted on 01/23/2015 6:57:52 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There is only one way it makes sense.


2 posted on 01/23/2015 7:02:41 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I guess when you have an Iranian born chief of staff, a former secretary of State with a long time aide with strong MB family ties, and MB czar appointees sitting in your WH this is what you get...


3 posted on 01/23/2015 7:07:05 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Think how different the world would be now if Obama had backed the popular uprising of iran’s youth at the beginning of his first term

That moment will go down in history as a pivot point with disastrous a outcome.

Sometimes I wonder whether there is an iranian agent digging away in this administration


4 posted on 01/23/2015 7:07:56 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

...plus a Muslim traitor prez...


5 posted on 01/23/2015 7:07:57 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

“agent”? More like agentS....


6 posted on 01/23/2015 7:11:08 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Exactly.


7 posted on 01/23/2015 7:14:14 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

8 posted on 01/23/2015 7:14:21 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR; Travis McGee; jsanders2001
The reality is that George Bush replaced the Sunni govt in Iraq with a Shia controlled govt. This led to a civil war in Iraq and Bush sent in a surge of US troops to put down the Sunni insurgency.

The Shia prime minister(Maliki), who Bush supported, swore up and down to Bush that he would share power and the oil revenue with the Sunni and the Kurds, but actually purged all of them.

Which is why the Iraqi Sunni were willing to co-operate with ISIS, which allowed ISIS to invade Iraq.

To this day, Saudi Arabia has never recognized the Shia govt in Iraq.

9 posted on 01/23/2015 9:51:59 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So obviously the US did arm and fund ISIS as a buffer against the Shia and Assad. True they mostly used cutouts like Qatar, Yemen and ambassador Stevens. Then the founders of ISIS either got out of control or were just using the US the whole time. Looks like the Israelis are the only decent people in that region, which explains why Obama hates them.


10 posted on 01/23/2015 1:24:20 PM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson