Totally intercourse-consent-capable.
Posted on 01/22/2015 8:40:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
They’re not afraid enough, or they would stop letting them in our countries at taxpayer expense. they are creating the crisis which they then want to use to further destroy our liberty and economic freedom.
But insulting the following is okay with him: The founders, the constitution, the 2nd Amendment, Christians, Jesus, God, white males, Sarah Palin, Palin’s children, and Conservatives.
That whole “fighting words” defense is just an attempt to justify the lack of self control some people have over their own behavior. People that are unable to control themselves are a threat to the public safety.
Mohamed was a pedophile and a savage.
What about insulting Catholics?
Insulting Christians?
Insulting Evangelicals?
Totally intercourse-consent-capable.
Insulting some dead guy who is buried in a box within a box out in the desert someplace? Our Yeshua lives, your prophet MoHAMmad is dead, Jim.
This is what I believe as well. Satan never sleeps, and I will never be silent.
Let’s us all just bury our heads in the sand.
Mabbie iffen we do—those scary Muzzies will just go away and ferget us and go somewares else and rob rape and pillage elsewhere and ferget all about us here in our ivory tower and and then WE can ferget about all the dead and beheaded folks in that there middle-east land and we won’t be bothered no more here where we are nice and safe under the soft warm sand.
Yep—that’s do.
Can anyone name a School of Journalism that ISN’T Marxist?
I can’t.
Indeed, I might decide to become violent and bomb a pornography outlet, because it offends and insults me to the point of violence.
As well, Muslims could eventually get us to cover up our women in burkas because the sight of their sexy bodies incites them to violence. There is no end to this but the double standard will stay in place as the boundaries move, I’m quite sure.
Sorry I can and will talk about people who have sex with children any way I want to.
Where in the first amendment does it say, “discretionary”?
This guy is a moron. And they made him dean.
He was qualified...
I’m waiting for the editorial cartoon showing the NYT front page, saying, “Je Suis Coward”.
So lets see if I understand liberalisms two stances:
1) Speech that incites violence is not protected speech, and Muslims are much more easily incited to violence than Christians.
2) Islam, Judaism, Christianity are equivalent religions and Islam is a religion of peace.
So, which is it, liberals? You can’t have both!
No it does not. If you can not speak out about evil then you have no free speech. Journalism is nothing but propaganda at that point.
Many muslims would also react violently to satirical depictions of Osama bin Laden. Is THAT to be avoided as well?
One day the Muslims are going to become arrogant enough in western countries to demand “respect” for Muslim views on, say, homosexuality (at least per koran, if not in practice). I await with interest the left’s response. It hasn’t happened on a large, public, microphone yet, but it will, as the left continues to appease them.
Actually, the left is going to have a lot of dilemmas in the near future as their special interest identity groups become empowered, one by one, to demand their competing interests. We already see it with the working-class white vote. I’m waiting to see if that’s an anomaly of the last election, or a trend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.